Cargando…

Coverage‐Controlled Superstructures of C (3)‐Symmetric Molecules: Honeycomb versus Hexagonal Tiling

The competition between honeycomb and hexagonal tiling of molecular units can lead to large honeycomb superstructures on surfaces. Such superstructures exhibit pores that may be used as 2D templates for functional guest molecules. Honeycomb superstructures of molecules that comprise a C(3) symmetric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jasper‐Tönnies, Torben, Gruber, Manuel, Ulrich, Sandra, Herges, Rainer, Berndt, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32106353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.202001383
_version_ 1783532491070504960
author Jasper‐Tönnies, Torben
Gruber, Manuel
Ulrich, Sandra
Herges, Rainer
Berndt, Richard
author_facet Jasper‐Tönnies, Torben
Gruber, Manuel
Ulrich, Sandra
Herges, Rainer
Berndt, Richard
author_sort Jasper‐Tönnies, Torben
collection PubMed
description The competition between honeycomb and hexagonal tiling of molecular units can lead to large honeycomb superstructures on surfaces. Such superstructures exhibit pores that may be used as 2D templates for functional guest molecules. Honeycomb superstructures of molecules that comprise a C(3) symmetric platform on Au(111) and Ag(111) surfaces are presented. The superstructures cover nearly mesoscopic areas with unit cells containing up to 3000 molecules, more than an order of magnitude larger than previously reported. The unit cell size may be controlled by the coverage. A fairly general model was developed to describe the energetics of honeycomb superstructures built from C (3) symmetric units. Based on three parameters that characterize two competing bonding arrangements, the model is consistent with the present experimental data and also reproduces various published results. The model identifies the relevant driving force, mostly related to geometric aspects, of the pattern formation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7216838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72168382020-05-13 Coverage‐Controlled Superstructures of C (3)‐Symmetric Molecules: Honeycomb versus Hexagonal Tiling Jasper‐Tönnies, Torben Gruber, Manuel Ulrich, Sandra Herges, Rainer Berndt, Richard Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Research Articles The competition between honeycomb and hexagonal tiling of molecular units can lead to large honeycomb superstructures on surfaces. Such superstructures exhibit pores that may be used as 2D templates for functional guest molecules. Honeycomb superstructures of molecules that comprise a C(3) symmetric platform on Au(111) and Ag(111) surfaces are presented. The superstructures cover nearly mesoscopic areas with unit cells containing up to 3000 molecules, more than an order of magnitude larger than previously reported. The unit cell size may be controlled by the coverage. A fairly general model was developed to describe the energetics of honeycomb superstructures built from C (3) symmetric units. Based on three parameters that characterize two competing bonding arrangements, the model is consistent with the present experimental data and also reproduces various published results. The model identifies the relevant driving force, mostly related to geometric aspects, of the pattern formation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-20 2020-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7216838/ /pubmed/32106353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.202001383 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Jasper‐Tönnies, Torben
Gruber, Manuel
Ulrich, Sandra
Herges, Rainer
Berndt, Richard
Coverage‐Controlled Superstructures of C (3)‐Symmetric Molecules: Honeycomb versus Hexagonal Tiling
title Coverage‐Controlled Superstructures of C (3)‐Symmetric Molecules: Honeycomb versus Hexagonal Tiling
title_full Coverage‐Controlled Superstructures of C (3)‐Symmetric Molecules: Honeycomb versus Hexagonal Tiling
title_fullStr Coverage‐Controlled Superstructures of C (3)‐Symmetric Molecules: Honeycomb versus Hexagonal Tiling
title_full_unstemmed Coverage‐Controlled Superstructures of C (3)‐Symmetric Molecules: Honeycomb versus Hexagonal Tiling
title_short Coverage‐Controlled Superstructures of C (3)‐Symmetric Molecules: Honeycomb versus Hexagonal Tiling
title_sort coverage‐controlled superstructures of c (3)‐symmetric molecules: honeycomb versus hexagonal tiling
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32106353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.202001383
work_keys_str_mv AT jaspertonniestorben coveragecontrolledsuperstructuresofc3symmetricmoleculeshoneycombversushexagonaltiling
AT grubermanuel coveragecontrolledsuperstructuresofc3symmetricmoleculeshoneycombversushexagonaltiling
AT ulrichsandra coveragecontrolledsuperstructuresofc3symmetricmoleculeshoneycombversushexagonaltiling
AT hergesrainer coveragecontrolledsuperstructuresofc3symmetricmoleculeshoneycombversushexagonaltiling
AT berndtrichard coveragecontrolledsuperstructuresofc3symmetricmoleculeshoneycombversushexagonaltiling