Cargando…

Methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first‐line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (SCCHN), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase Ib‐randomized phase II study Commence

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has limited progression‐free survival (PFS) benefit. We hypothesized that adding cetuximab to methotrexate improves PFS. METHODS: In the phase‐Ib‐study, patients with R/M SCCHN received met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ham, Janneke C., van Meerten, Esther, Fiets, W. Edward, Beerepoot, Laurens V., Jeurissen, Frank J. F., Slingerland, Marije, Jonker, Marianne A., Husson, Olga, van der Graaf, Winette T. A., van Herpen, Carla M. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31903657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.26053
_version_ 1783532503716331520
author Ham, Janneke C.
van Meerten, Esther
Fiets, W. Edward
Beerepoot, Laurens V.
Jeurissen, Frank J. F.
Slingerland, Marije
Jonker, Marianne A.
Husson, Olga
van der Graaf, Winette T. A.
van Herpen, Carla M. L.
author_facet Ham, Janneke C.
van Meerten, Esther
Fiets, W. Edward
Beerepoot, Laurens V.
Jeurissen, Frank J. F.
Slingerland, Marije
Jonker, Marianne A.
Husson, Olga
van der Graaf, Winette T. A.
van Herpen, Carla M. L.
author_sort Ham, Janneke C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Methotrexate in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has limited progression‐free survival (PFS) benefit. We hypothesized that adding cetuximab to methotrexate improves PFS. METHODS: In the phase‐Ib‐study, patients with R/M SCCHN received methotrexate and cetuximab as first‐line treatment. The primary objective was feasibility. In the phase‐II‐study patients were randomized to this combination or methotrexate alone (2:1). The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: In six patients in the phase‐Ib‐study, no dose limiting toxicities were observed. In the phase II study, 30 patients received the combination and 15 patients methotrexate. In the phase‐II‐study median PFS was 4.5 months in the combination group vs 2.0 months in the methotrexate group (HR 0.37; P = .002). OS, toxicity, and QoL were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Cetuximab with methotrexate improved PFS without increased toxicity in R/M SCCHN‐patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7216894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72168942020-05-13 Methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first‐line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (SCCHN), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase Ib‐randomized phase II study Commence Ham, Janneke C. van Meerten, Esther Fiets, W. Edward Beerepoot, Laurens V. Jeurissen, Frank J. F. Slingerland, Marije Jonker, Marianne A. Husson, Olga van der Graaf, Winette T. A. van Herpen, Carla M. L. Head Neck Original Articles BACKGROUND: Methotrexate in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has limited progression‐free survival (PFS) benefit. We hypothesized that adding cetuximab to methotrexate improves PFS. METHODS: In the phase‐Ib‐study, patients with R/M SCCHN received methotrexate and cetuximab as first‐line treatment. The primary objective was feasibility. In the phase‐II‐study patients were randomized to this combination or methotrexate alone (2:1). The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: In six patients in the phase‐Ib‐study, no dose limiting toxicities were observed. In the phase II study, 30 patients received the combination and 15 patients methotrexate. In the phase‐II‐study median PFS was 4.5 months in the combination group vs 2.0 months in the methotrexate group (HR 0.37; P = .002). OS, toxicity, and QoL were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Cetuximab with methotrexate improved PFS without increased toxicity in R/M SCCHN‐patients. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-01-06 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7216894/ /pubmed/31903657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.26053 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Head & Neck published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ham, Janneke C.
van Meerten, Esther
Fiets, W. Edward
Beerepoot, Laurens V.
Jeurissen, Frank J. F.
Slingerland, Marije
Jonker, Marianne A.
Husson, Olga
van der Graaf, Winette T. A.
van Herpen, Carla M. L.
Methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first‐line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (SCCHN), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase Ib‐randomized phase II study Commence
title Methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first‐line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (SCCHN), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase Ib‐randomized phase II study Commence
title_full Methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first‐line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (SCCHN), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase Ib‐randomized phase II study Commence
title_fullStr Methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first‐line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (SCCHN), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase Ib‐randomized phase II study Commence
title_full_unstemmed Methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first‐line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (SCCHN), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase Ib‐randomized phase II study Commence
title_short Methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first‐line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (SCCHN), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase Ib‐randomized phase II study Commence
title_sort methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first‐line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (r/m) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (scchn), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase ib‐randomized phase ii study commence
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31903657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.26053
work_keys_str_mv AT hamjannekec methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence
AT vanmeertenesther methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence
AT fietswedward methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence
AT beerepootlaurensv methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence
AT jeurissenfrankjf methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence
AT slingerlandmarije methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence
AT jonkermariannea methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence
AT hussonolga methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence
AT vandergraafwinetteta methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence
AT vanherpencarlaml methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence