Cargando…
Methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first‐line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (SCCHN), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase Ib‐randomized phase II study Commence
BACKGROUND: Methotrexate in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has limited progression‐free survival (PFS) benefit. We hypothesized that adding cetuximab to methotrexate improves PFS. METHODS: In the phase‐Ib‐study, patients with R/M SCCHN received met...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31903657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.26053 |
_version_ | 1783532503716331520 |
---|---|
author | Ham, Janneke C. van Meerten, Esther Fiets, W. Edward Beerepoot, Laurens V. Jeurissen, Frank J. F. Slingerland, Marije Jonker, Marianne A. Husson, Olga van der Graaf, Winette T. A. van Herpen, Carla M. L. |
author_facet | Ham, Janneke C. van Meerten, Esther Fiets, W. Edward Beerepoot, Laurens V. Jeurissen, Frank J. F. Slingerland, Marije Jonker, Marianne A. Husson, Olga van der Graaf, Winette T. A. van Herpen, Carla M. L. |
author_sort | Ham, Janneke C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Methotrexate in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has limited progression‐free survival (PFS) benefit. We hypothesized that adding cetuximab to methotrexate improves PFS. METHODS: In the phase‐Ib‐study, patients with R/M SCCHN received methotrexate and cetuximab as first‐line treatment. The primary objective was feasibility. In the phase‐II‐study patients were randomized to this combination or methotrexate alone (2:1). The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: In six patients in the phase‐Ib‐study, no dose limiting toxicities were observed. In the phase II study, 30 patients received the combination and 15 patients methotrexate. In the phase‐II‐study median PFS was 4.5 months in the combination group vs 2.0 months in the methotrexate group (HR 0.37; P = .002). OS, toxicity, and QoL were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Cetuximab with methotrexate improved PFS without increased toxicity in R/M SCCHN‐patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7216894 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72168942020-05-13 Methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first‐line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (SCCHN), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase Ib‐randomized phase II study Commence Ham, Janneke C. van Meerten, Esther Fiets, W. Edward Beerepoot, Laurens V. Jeurissen, Frank J. F. Slingerland, Marije Jonker, Marianne A. Husson, Olga van der Graaf, Winette T. A. van Herpen, Carla M. L. Head Neck Original Articles BACKGROUND: Methotrexate in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has limited progression‐free survival (PFS) benefit. We hypothesized that adding cetuximab to methotrexate improves PFS. METHODS: In the phase‐Ib‐study, patients with R/M SCCHN received methotrexate and cetuximab as first‐line treatment. The primary objective was feasibility. In the phase‐II‐study patients were randomized to this combination or methotrexate alone (2:1). The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: In six patients in the phase‐Ib‐study, no dose limiting toxicities were observed. In the phase II study, 30 patients received the combination and 15 patients methotrexate. In the phase‐II‐study median PFS was 4.5 months in the combination group vs 2.0 months in the methotrexate group (HR 0.37; P = .002). OS, toxicity, and QoL were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Cetuximab with methotrexate improved PFS without increased toxicity in R/M SCCHN‐patients. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-01-06 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7216894/ /pubmed/31903657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.26053 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Head & Neck published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Ham, Janneke C. van Meerten, Esther Fiets, W. Edward Beerepoot, Laurens V. Jeurissen, Frank J. F. Slingerland, Marije Jonker, Marianne A. Husson, Olga van der Graaf, Winette T. A. van Herpen, Carla M. L. Methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first‐line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (SCCHN), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase Ib‐randomized phase II study Commence |
title | Methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first‐line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (SCCHN), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase Ib‐randomized phase II study Commence |
title_full | Methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first‐line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (SCCHN), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase Ib‐randomized phase II study Commence |
title_fullStr | Methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first‐line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (SCCHN), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase Ib‐randomized phase II study Commence |
title_full_unstemmed | Methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first‐line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (SCCHN), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase Ib‐randomized phase II study Commence |
title_short | Methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first‐line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (SCCHN), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase Ib‐randomized phase II study Commence |
title_sort | methotrexate plus or minus cetuximab as first‐line treatment in a recurrent or metastatic (r/m) squamous cell carcinoma population of the head and neck (scchn), unfit for cisplatin combination treatment, a phase ib‐randomized phase ii study commence |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31903657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.26053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamjannekec methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence AT vanmeertenesther methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence AT fietswedward methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence AT beerepootlaurensv methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence AT jeurissenfrankjf methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence AT slingerlandmarije methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence AT jonkermariannea methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence AT hussonolga methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence AT vandergraafwinetteta methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence AT vanherpencarlaml methotrexateplusorminuscetuximabasfirstlinetreatmentinarecurrentormetastaticrmsquamouscellcarcinomapopulationoftheheadandneckscchnunfitforcisplatincombinationtreatmentaphaseibrandomizedphaseiistudycommence |