Cargando…

Assessment and correction of macroscopic field variations in 2D spoiled gradient‐echo sequences

PURPOSE: To model and correct the dephasing effects in the gradient‐echo signal for arbitrary RF excitation pulses with large flip angles in the presence of macroscopic field variations. METHODS: The dephasing of the spoiled 2D gradient‐echo signal was modeled using a numerical solution of the Bloch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soellradl, Martin, Lesch, Andreas, Strasser, Johannes, Pirpamer, Lukas, Stollberger, Rudolf, Ropele, Stefan, Langkammer, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31868260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28139
_version_ 1783532516436606976
author Soellradl, Martin
Lesch, Andreas
Strasser, Johannes
Pirpamer, Lukas
Stollberger, Rudolf
Ropele, Stefan
Langkammer, Christian
author_facet Soellradl, Martin
Lesch, Andreas
Strasser, Johannes
Pirpamer, Lukas
Stollberger, Rudolf
Ropele, Stefan
Langkammer, Christian
author_sort Soellradl, Martin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To model and correct the dephasing effects in the gradient‐echo signal for arbitrary RF excitation pulses with large flip angles in the presence of macroscopic field variations. METHODS: The dephasing of the spoiled 2D gradient‐echo signal was modeled using a numerical solution of the Bloch equations to calculate the magnitude and phase of the transverse magnetization across the slice profile. Additionally, regional variations of the transmit RF field and slice profile scaling due to macroscopic field gradients were included. Simulations, phantom, and in vivo measurements at 3 T were conducted for [Formula: see text] and myelin water fraction (MWF) mapping. RESULTS: The influence of macroscopic field gradients on [Formula: see text] and myelin water fraction estimation can be substantially reduced by applying the proposed model. Moreover, it was shown that the dephasing over time for flip angles of 60° or greater also depends on the polarity of the slice‐selection gradient because of phase variation along the slice profile. CONCLUSION: Substantial improvements in [Formula: see text] accuracy and myelin water fraction mapping coverage can be achieved using the proposed model if higher flip angles are required. In this context, we demonstrated that the phase along the slice profile and the polarity of the slice‐selection gradient are essential for proper modeling of the gradient‐echo signal in the presence of macroscopic field variations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7216950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72169502020-05-13 Assessment and correction of macroscopic field variations in 2D spoiled gradient‐echo sequences Soellradl, Martin Lesch, Andreas Strasser, Johannes Pirpamer, Lukas Stollberger, Rudolf Ropele, Stefan Langkammer, Christian Magn Reson Med Full Papers—Imaging Methodology PURPOSE: To model and correct the dephasing effects in the gradient‐echo signal for arbitrary RF excitation pulses with large flip angles in the presence of macroscopic field variations. METHODS: The dephasing of the spoiled 2D gradient‐echo signal was modeled using a numerical solution of the Bloch equations to calculate the magnitude and phase of the transverse magnetization across the slice profile. Additionally, regional variations of the transmit RF field and slice profile scaling due to macroscopic field gradients were included. Simulations, phantom, and in vivo measurements at 3 T were conducted for [Formula: see text] and myelin water fraction (MWF) mapping. RESULTS: The influence of macroscopic field gradients on [Formula: see text] and myelin water fraction estimation can be substantially reduced by applying the proposed model. Moreover, it was shown that the dephasing over time for flip angles of 60° or greater also depends on the polarity of the slice‐selection gradient because of phase variation along the slice profile. CONCLUSION: Substantial improvements in [Formula: see text] accuracy and myelin water fraction mapping coverage can be achieved using the proposed model if higher flip angles are required. In this context, we demonstrated that the phase along the slice profile and the polarity of the slice‐selection gradient are essential for proper modeling of the gradient‐echo signal in the presence of macroscopic field variations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-23 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7216950/ /pubmed/31868260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28139 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Papers—Imaging Methodology
Soellradl, Martin
Lesch, Andreas
Strasser, Johannes
Pirpamer, Lukas
Stollberger, Rudolf
Ropele, Stefan
Langkammer, Christian
Assessment and correction of macroscopic field variations in 2D spoiled gradient‐echo sequences
title Assessment and correction of macroscopic field variations in 2D spoiled gradient‐echo sequences
title_full Assessment and correction of macroscopic field variations in 2D spoiled gradient‐echo sequences
title_fullStr Assessment and correction of macroscopic field variations in 2D spoiled gradient‐echo sequences
title_full_unstemmed Assessment and correction of macroscopic field variations in 2D spoiled gradient‐echo sequences
title_short Assessment and correction of macroscopic field variations in 2D spoiled gradient‐echo sequences
title_sort assessment and correction of macroscopic field variations in 2d spoiled gradient‐echo sequences
topic Full Papers—Imaging Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31868260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28139
work_keys_str_mv AT soellradlmartin assessmentandcorrectionofmacroscopicfieldvariationsin2dspoiledgradientechosequences
AT leschandreas assessmentandcorrectionofmacroscopicfieldvariationsin2dspoiledgradientechosequences
AT strasserjohannes assessmentandcorrectionofmacroscopicfieldvariationsin2dspoiledgradientechosequences
AT pirpamerlukas assessmentandcorrectionofmacroscopicfieldvariationsin2dspoiledgradientechosequences
AT stollbergerrudolf assessmentandcorrectionofmacroscopicfieldvariationsin2dspoiledgradientechosequences
AT ropelestefan assessmentandcorrectionofmacroscopicfieldvariationsin2dspoiledgradientechosequences
AT langkammerchristian assessmentandcorrectionofmacroscopicfieldvariationsin2dspoiledgradientechosequences