Cargando…

Clinical outcome comparison of Grade Group 1 and Grade Group 2 prostate cancer with and without cribriform architecture at the time of radical prostatectomy

AIMS: Invasive cribriform and intraductal carcinoma are associated with aggressive disease in Grade Group 2 (GG2) prostate cancer patients. However, the characteristics and clinical outcome of patients with GG2 prostate cancer without cribriform architecture (GG2−) as compared with those with Grade...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hollemans, Eva, Verhoef, Esther I, Bangma, Chris H, Rietbergen, John, Roobol, Monique J, Helleman, Jozien, van Leenders, Geert J L H
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:	Original Articles
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7216977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31944367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.14064

Ejemplares similares

Concordance of cribriform architecture in matched prostate cancer biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens
por: Hollemans, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Large cribriform growth pattern identifies ISUP grade 2 prostate cancer at high risk for recurrence and metastasis
por: Hollemans, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cribriform architecture in radical prostatectomies predicts oncological outcome in Gleason score 8 prostate cancer patients
por: Hollemans, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cribriform architecture outperforms Gleason pattern 4 percentage and tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in predicting the outcome of Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients
por: Seyrek, Neslisah, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Intraductal carcinoma has a minimal impact on Grade Group assignment in prostate cancer biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens
por: Rijstenberg, L. Lucia, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Alternative prostate cancer grading systems incorporating percent pattern 4/5 (IQ-Gleason) and cribriform architecture (cGrade) improve prediction of outcome after radical prostatectomy
por: Seyrek, Neslisah, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Intraoperative assessment and reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens to guide nerve‐sparing surgery in prostate cancer patients (NeuroSAFE)
por: van der Slot, Margaretha A, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Prostate cancer growth patterns beyond the Gleason score: entering a new era of comprehensive tumour grading
por: van Leenders, Geert J L H, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

NeuroSAFE in radical prostatectomy increases the rate of nerve‐sparing surgery without affecting oncological outcome
por: van der Slot, Margaretha A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Percentage Gleason pattern 4 and PI-RADS score predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform pattern
por: van der Slot, Margaretha A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Large and small cribriform architecture have similar adverse clinical outcome on prostate cancer biopsies
por: Rijstenberg, L Lucia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comedonecrosis Gleason pattern 5 is associated with worse clinical outcome in operated prostate cancer patients
por: Hansum, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Automated detection of cribriform growth patterns in prostate histology images
por: Ambrosini, Pierre, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Inter-observer variability of cribriform architecture and percent Gleason pattern 4 in prostate cancer: relation to clinical outcome
por: van der Slot, Margaretha A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Updating the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator with Invasive Cribriform and/or Intraductal Carcinoma for Men with a Prior Negative Biopsy
por: Remmers, Sebastiaan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

On cribriform prostate cancer
por: Kweldam, Charlotte F., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Are we ready to include invasive cribriform and intraductal carcinoma into the prostate cancer grade grouping system?
por: Xiao, Guang-Qian, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cribriform pattern does not have a significant impact in Gleason Score ≥7/ISUP Grade ≥2 prostate cancers submitted to radical prostatectomy
por: Flammia, Simone, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Prognostic differences among Grade Group 4 subgroups in robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy
por: Sasaki, Takeshi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Radiologist-like artificial intelligence for grade group prediction of radical prostatectomy for reducing upgrading and downgrading from biopsy
por: Shao, Lizhi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Clinical Predictors of Grade Group Upgrading for Radical Prostatectomy Specimens Compared to Those of Preoperative Needle Biopsy Specimens
por: Tomioka, Masayuki, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Low-grade Cribriform Cystadenocarcinoma: A Review of the Literature and Case Report
por: Wakabayashi, Nao, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Gene-expression analysis of gleason grade 3 tumor glands embedded in low- and high-risk prostate cancer
por: Hoogland, A. Marije, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cribriform pattern in prostate tissues: Predictor for intraductal carcinoma of the prostate based on biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology
por: Shiomi, Ei, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reporting Gleason grade/score in synoptic reports of radical prostatectomies
por: Renshaw, Andrew A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Endoscopic trans-pterygoid resection of a low-grade cribriform cystadenocarcinoma of the infratemporal fossa
por: Ramjee, Vikram G., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of outcomes of different biopsy schedules among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: An analysis of the G.A.P.3 global consortium database
por: Beckmann, Kerri R., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Diagnostic performance of a nomogram incorporating cribriform morphology for the prediction of adverse pathology in prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy
por: Wang, Baojun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Graded rings and graded Grothendieck groups
por: Hazrat, Roozbeh
Publicado: (2016)

Low-grade cribriform cystadenocarcinoma of salivary glands: report of two cases and review of the literature
por: Wang, Liang, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Cribriform adenocarcinoma of minor salivary gland: A mimic of polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma
por: Madhura, MG, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models
por: Liu, Hailang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Adverse Pathological Findings at Radical Prostatectomy following Active Surveillance: Results from the Movember GAP3 Cohort
por: Marenghi, Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

From Cognitive MR-Targeted Fusion Prostate Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy: Incidence and Predictors of Gleason Grade Group Upgrading in a Chinese Cohort
por: Yan, Huaqing, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Outcomes of pathologically localized high-grade prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy
por: Heo, Ji Eun, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Low-Grade Cribriform Cystadenocarcinoma with Many Psammoma Bodies of the Salivary Gland
por: Jeong, Ji Yun, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The Association of Fatty Acid Levels and Gleason Grade among Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
por: Zhao, Zhiguo, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Detecting and grading prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens through deep learning techniques
por: Melo, Petronio Augusto de Souza, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Correlation between ADC, ADC ratio, and Gleason Grade group in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: Retrospective multicenter study with different MRI scanners
por: Bengtsson, Johan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Analysis of separate training and validation radical prostatectomy cohorts identifies 0.25 mm diameter as an optimal definition for “large” cribriform prostatic adenocarcinoma
por: Chan, Emily, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_j1tqbmr5bp9ch4dk1i7sps4bih