Cargando…
Elective neck treatment in sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas (SNUCs), being an aggressive malignancy with dismal survival outcome, have given limited consideration regarding management of regional failures. A total of 12 studies, published between 1999 and 2019, met inclusion criteria. We performed a meta‐analysis assessi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31922316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.26077 |
_version_ | 1783532536981356544 |
---|---|
author | Faisal, Muhammad Seemann, Rudolf Lill, Claudia Hamzavi, Sasan Wutzl, Arno Erovic, Boban M. Janik, Stefan |
author_facet | Faisal, Muhammad Seemann, Rudolf Lill, Claudia Hamzavi, Sasan Wutzl, Arno Erovic, Boban M. Janik, Stefan |
author_sort | Faisal, Muhammad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas (SNUCs), being an aggressive malignancy with dismal survival outcome, have given limited consideration regarding management of regional failures. A total of 12 studies, published between 1999 and 2019, met inclusion criteria. We performed a meta‐analysis assessing regional (neck) relapse after elective neck treatment compared to observation in clinically node negative (N0) necks. Clinical data of 255 patients were used for meta‐analysis. Among them, 83.4% of patients presented with T4 tumors and 14.1% had positive neck nodes. Elective neck treatment was applied in 49.5% of analyzed patients. Regional relapses occurred in 3.7% of patients who have undergone elective neck treatment compared to 26.4% in patients who had not. Elective neck treatment significantly reduced the risk of regional recurrence (odds ratio 0.20; 95% confidence interval 0.08‐0.49; P = .0004). The meta‐analysis indicates that elective neck treatment could significantly reduce the risk of regional failures in patients with SNUCs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7217044 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72170442020-05-13 Elective neck treatment in sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: Systematic review and meta‐analysis Faisal, Muhammad Seemann, Rudolf Lill, Claudia Hamzavi, Sasan Wutzl, Arno Erovic, Boban M. Janik, Stefan Head Neck Clinical Reviews Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas (SNUCs), being an aggressive malignancy with dismal survival outcome, have given limited consideration regarding management of regional failures. A total of 12 studies, published between 1999 and 2019, met inclusion criteria. We performed a meta‐analysis assessing regional (neck) relapse after elective neck treatment compared to observation in clinically node negative (N0) necks. Clinical data of 255 patients were used for meta‐analysis. Among them, 83.4% of patients presented with T4 tumors and 14.1% had positive neck nodes. Elective neck treatment was applied in 49.5% of analyzed patients. Regional relapses occurred in 3.7% of patients who have undergone elective neck treatment compared to 26.4% in patients who had not. Elective neck treatment significantly reduced the risk of regional recurrence (odds ratio 0.20; 95% confidence interval 0.08‐0.49; P = .0004). The meta‐analysis indicates that elective neck treatment could significantly reduce the risk of regional failures in patients with SNUCs. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-01-10 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7217044/ /pubmed/31922316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.26077 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Head & Neck published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Reviews Faisal, Muhammad Seemann, Rudolf Lill, Claudia Hamzavi, Sasan Wutzl, Arno Erovic, Boban M. Janik, Stefan Elective neck treatment in sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: Systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title | Elective neck treatment in sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: Systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full | Elective neck treatment in sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: Systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Elective neck treatment in sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: Systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Elective neck treatment in sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: Systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_short | Elective neck treatment in sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: Systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_sort | elective neck treatment in sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma: systematic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Clinical Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31922316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.26077 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT faisalmuhammad electivenecktreatmentinsinonasalundifferentiatedcarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT seemannrudolf electivenecktreatmentinsinonasalundifferentiatedcarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lillclaudia electivenecktreatmentinsinonasalundifferentiatedcarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hamzavisasan electivenecktreatmentinsinonasalundifferentiatedcarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wutzlarno electivenecktreatmentinsinonasalundifferentiatedcarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT erovicbobanm electivenecktreatmentinsinonasalundifferentiatedcarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT janikstefan electivenecktreatmentinsinonasalundifferentiatedcarcinomasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |