Cargando…

Sample size and power calculations for open cohort longitudinal cluster randomized trials

When calculating sample size or power for stepped wedge or other types of longitudinal cluster randomized trials, it is critical that the planned sampling structure be accurately specified. One common assumption is that participants will provide measurements in each trial period, that is, a closed c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kasza, Jessica, Hooper, Richard, Copas, Andrew, Forbes, Andrew B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32133688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.8519
_version_ 1783532558346092544
author Kasza, Jessica
Hooper, Richard
Copas, Andrew
Forbes, Andrew B.
author_facet Kasza, Jessica
Hooper, Richard
Copas, Andrew
Forbes, Andrew B.
author_sort Kasza, Jessica
collection PubMed
description When calculating sample size or power for stepped wedge or other types of longitudinal cluster randomized trials, it is critical that the planned sampling structure be accurately specified. One common assumption is that participants will provide measurements in each trial period, that is, a closed cohort, and another is that each participant provides only one measurement during the course of the trial. However some studies have an “open cohort” sampling structure, where participants may provide measurements in variable numbers of periods. To date, sample size calculations for longitudinal cluster randomized trials have not accommodated open cohorts. Feldman and McKinlay (1994) provided some guidance, stating that the participant‐level autocorrelation could be varied to account for the degree of overlap in different periods of the study, but did not indicate precisely how to do so. We present sample size and power formulas that allow for open cohorts and discuss the impact of the degree of “openness” on sample size and power. We consider designs where the number of participants in each cluster will be maintained throughout the trial, but individual participants may provide differing numbers of measurements. Our results are a unification of closed cohort and repeated cross‐sectional sample results of Hooper et al (2016), and indicate precisely how participant autocorrelation of Feldman and McKinlay should be varied to account for an open cohort sampling structure. We discuss different types of open cohort sampling schemes and how open cohort sampling structure impacts on power in the presence of decaying within‐cluster correlations and autoregressive participant‐level errors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7217159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72171592020-05-13 Sample size and power calculations for open cohort longitudinal cluster randomized trials Kasza, Jessica Hooper, Richard Copas, Andrew Forbes, Andrew B. Stat Med Research Articles When calculating sample size or power for stepped wedge or other types of longitudinal cluster randomized trials, it is critical that the planned sampling structure be accurately specified. One common assumption is that participants will provide measurements in each trial period, that is, a closed cohort, and another is that each participant provides only one measurement during the course of the trial. However some studies have an “open cohort” sampling structure, where participants may provide measurements in variable numbers of periods. To date, sample size calculations for longitudinal cluster randomized trials have not accommodated open cohorts. Feldman and McKinlay (1994) provided some guidance, stating that the participant‐level autocorrelation could be varied to account for the degree of overlap in different periods of the study, but did not indicate precisely how to do so. We present sample size and power formulas that allow for open cohorts and discuss the impact of the degree of “openness” on sample size and power. We consider designs where the number of participants in each cluster will be maintained throughout the trial, but individual participants may provide differing numbers of measurements. Our results are a unification of closed cohort and repeated cross‐sectional sample results of Hooper et al (2016), and indicate precisely how participant autocorrelation of Feldman and McKinlay should be varied to account for an open cohort sampling structure. We discuss different types of open cohort sampling schemes and how open cohort sampling structure impacts on power in the presence of decaying within‐cluster correlations and autoregressive participant‐level errors. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-04 2020-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7217159/ /pubmed/32133688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.8519 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Kasza, Jessica
Hooper, Richard
Copas, Andrew
Forbes, Andrew B.
Sample size and power calculations for open cohort longitudinal cluster randomized trials
title Sample size and power calculations for open cohort longitudinal cluster randomized trials
title_full Sample size and power calculations for open cohort longitudinal cluster randomized trials
title_fullStr Sample size and power calculations for open cohort longitudinal cluster randomized trials
title_full_unstemmed Sample size and power calculations for open cohort longitudinal cluster randomized trials
title_short Sample size and power calculations for open cohort longitudinal cluster randomized trials
title_sort sample size and power calculations for open cohort longitudinal cluster randomized trials
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32133688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.8519
work_keys_str_mv AT kaszajessica samplesizeandpowercalculationsforopencohortlongitudinalclusterrandomizedtrials
AT hooperrichard samplesizeandpowercalculationsforopencohortlongitudinalclusterrandomizedtrials
AT copasandrew samplesizeandpowercalculationsforopencohortlongitudinalclusterrandomizedtrials
AT forbesandrewb samplesizeandpowercalculationsforopencohortlongitudinalclusterrandomizedtrials