Cargando…

A pilot multi‐centre prospective randomised controlled trial of RECELL for the treatment of venous leg ulcers

Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) have a significant impact on approximately 3% of the adult population worldwide, with a mean NHS wound care cost of £7600 per VLU over 12 months. The standard care for VLUs is compression therapy, with a significant number of ulcers failing to heal with this treatment, espec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayes, Paul D., Harding, Keith G., Johnson, Susan M., McCollum, Charles, Téot, Luc, Mercer, Kevin, Russell, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13293
_version_ 1783532569786056704
author Hayes, Paul D.
Harding, Keith G.
Johnson, Susan M.
McCollum, Charles
Téot, Luc
Mercer, Kevin
Russell, David
author_facet Hayes, Paul D.
Harding, Keith G.
Johnson, Susan M.
McCollum, Charles
Téot, Luc
Mercer, Kevin
Russell, David
author_sort Hayes, Paul D.
collection PubMed
description Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) have a significant impact on approximately 3% of the adult population worldwide, with a mean NHS wound care cost of £7600 per VLU over 12 months. The standard care for VLUs is compression therapy, with a significant number of ulcers failing to heal with this treatment, especially with wound size being a risk factor for non‐healing. This multicentre, prospective, randomised trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) combined with compression therapy compared with standard compression alone (Control) for the treatment of VLUs. Incidence of complete wound closure at 14 weeks, donor site closure, pain, Health‐Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), satisfaction, and safety were assessed in 52 patients. At Week 14, VLUs treated with ASCS + compression had a statistically greater decrease in ulcer area compared with the Control (8.94 cm(2) versus 1.23 cm(2), P = .0143). This finding was largely driven by ulcers >10 to 80 cm(2) in size, as these ulcers had a higher mean percentage of reepithelialization at 14 weeks (ASCS + compression: 69.97% and Control: 11.07%, P = .0480). Additionally, subjects treated with ASCS + compression experienced a decrease in pain and an increase in HRQoL compared with the Control. This study indicates that application of ASCS + compression accelerates healing in large venous ulcers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7217204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72172042020-05-13 A pilot multi‐centre prospective randomised controlled trial of RECELL for the treatment of venous leg ulcers Hayes, Paul D. Harding, Keith G. Johnson, Susan M. McCollum, Charles Téot, Luc Mercer, Kevin Russell, David Int Wound J Original Articles Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) have a significant impact on approximately 3% of the adult population worldwide, with a mean NHS wound care cost of £7600 per VLU over 12 months. The standard care for VLUs is compression therapy, with a significant number of ulcers failing to heal with this treatment, especially with wound size being a risk factor for non‐healing. This multicentre, prospective, randomised trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) combined with compression therapy compared with standard compression alone (Control) for the treatment of VLUs. Incidence of complete wound closure at 14 weeks, donor site closure, pain, Health‐Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), satisfaction, and safety were assessed in 52 patients. At Week 14, VLUs treated with ASCS + compression had a statistically greater decrease in ulcer area compared with the Control (8.94 cm(2) versus 1.23 cm(2), P = .0143). This finding was largely driven by ulcers >10 to 80 cm(2) in size, as these ulcers had a higher mean percentage of reepithelialization at 14 weeks (ASCS + compression: 69.97% and Control: 11.07%, P = .0480). Additionally, subjects treated with ASCS + compression experienced a decrease in pain and an increase in HRQoL compared with the Control. This study indicates that application of ASCS + compression accelerates healing in large venous ulcers. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2020-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7217204/ /pubmed/32103603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13293 Text en © 2020 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hayes, Paul D.
Harding, Keith G.
Johnson, Susan M.
McCollum, Charles
Téot, Luc
Mercer, Kevin
Russell, David
A pilot multi‐centre prospective randomised controlled trial of RECELL for the treatment of venous leg ulcers
title A pilot multi‐centre prospective randomised controlled trial of RECELL for the treatment of venous leg ulcers
title_full A pilot multi‐centre prospective randomised controlled trial of RECELL for the treatment of venous leg ulcers
title_fullStr A pilot multi‐centre prospective randomised controlled trial of RECELL for the treatment of venous leg ulcers
title_full_unstemmed A pilot multi‐centre prospective randomised controlled trial of RECELL for the treatment of venous leg ulcers
title_short A pilot multi‐centre prospective randomised controlled trial of RECELL for the treatment of venous leg ulcers
title_sort pilot multi‐centre prospective randomised controlled trial of recell for the treatment of venous leg ulcers
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13293
work_keys_str_mv AT hayespauld apilotmulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofrecellforthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers
AT hardingkeithg apilotmulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofrecellforthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers
AT johnsonsusanm apilotmulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofrecellforthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers
AT mccollumcharles apilotmulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofrecellforthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers
AT teotluc apilotmulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofrecellforthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers
AT mercerkevin apilotmulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofrecellforthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers
AT russelldavid apilotmulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofrecellforthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers
AT hayespauld pilotmulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofrecellforthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers
AT hardingkeithg pilotmulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofrecellforthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers
AT johnsonsusanm pilotmulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofrecellforthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers
AT mccollumcharles pilotmulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofrecellforthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers
AT teotluc pilotmulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofrecellforthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers
AT mercerkevin pilotmulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofrecellforthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers
AT russelldavid pilotmulticentreprospectiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofrecellforthetreatmentofvenouslegulcers