Cargando…

Improving causality in microbiome research: can human genetic epidemiology help?

Evidence supports associations between human gut microbiome variation and multiple health outcomes and diseases. Despite compelling results from in vivo and in vitro models, few findings have been translated into an understanding of modifiable causal relationships. Furthermore, epidemiological studi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wade, Kaitlin H., Hall, Lindsay J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32462081
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15628.3
_version_ 1783532575438929920
author Wade, Kaitlin H.
Hall, Lindsay J.
author_facet Wade, Kaitlin H.
Hall, Lindsay J.
author_sort Wade, Kaitlin H.
collection PubMed
description Evidence supports associations between human gut microbiome variation and multiple health outcomes and diseases. Despite compelling results from in vivo and in vitro models, few findings have been translated into an understanding of modifiable causal relationships. Furthermore, epidemiological studies have been unconvincing in their ability to offer causal evidence due to their observational nature, where confounding by lifestyle and behavioural factors, reverse causation and bias are important limitations. Whilst randomized controlled trials have made steps towards understanding the causal role played by the gut microbiome in disease, they are expensive and time-consuming. This evidence that has not been translated between model systems impedes opportunities for harnessing the gut microbiome for improving population health. Therefore, there is a need for alternative approaches to interrogate causality in the context of gut microbiome research. The integration of human genetics within population health sciences have proved successful in facilitating improved causal inference (e.g., with Mendelian randomization [MR] studies) and characterising inherited disease susceptibility. MR is an established method that employs human genetic variation as natural “proxies” for clinically relevant (and ideally modifiable) traits to improve causality in observational associations between those traits and health outcomes. Here, we focus and discuss the utility of MR within the context of human gut microbiome research, review studies that have used this method and consider the strengths, limitations and challenges facing this research. Specifically, we highlight the requirements for careful examination and interpretation of derived causal estimates and host (i.e., human) genetic effects themselves, triangulation across multiple study designs and inter-disciplinary collaborations. Meeting these requirements will help support or challenge causality of the role played by the gut microbiome on human health to develop new, targeted therapies to alleviate disease symptoms to ultimately improve lives and promote good health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7217228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72172282020-05-26 Improving causality in microbiome research: can human genetic epidemiology help? Wade, Kaitlin H. Hall, Lindsay J. Wellcome Open Res Review Evidence supports associations between human gut microbiome variation and multiple health outcomes and diseases. Despite compelling results from in vivo and in vitro models, few findings have been translated into an understanding of modifiable causal relationships. Furthermore, epidemiological studies have been unconvincing in their ability to offer causal evidence due to their observational nature, where confounding by lifestyle and behavioural factors, reverse causation and bias are important limitations. Whilst randomized controlled trials have made steps towards understanding the causal role played by the gut microbiome in disease, they are expensive and time-consuming. This evidence that has not been translated between model systems impedes opportunities for harnessing the gut microbiome for improving population health. Therefore, there is a need for alternative approaches to interrogate causality in the context of gut microbiome research. The integration of human genetics within population health sciences have proved successful in facilitating improved causal inference (e.g., with Mendelian randomization [MR] studies) and characterising inherited disease susceptibility. MR is an established method that employs human genetic variation as natural “proxies” for clinically relevant (and ideally modifiable) traits to improve causality in observational associations between those traits and health outcomes. Here, we focus and discuss the utility of MR within the context of human gut microbiome research, review studies that have used this method and consider the strengths, limitations and challenges facing this research. Specifically, we highlight the requirements for careful examination and interpretation of derived causal estimates and host (i.e., human) genetic effects themselves, triangulation across multiple study designs and inter-disciplinary collaborations. Meeting these requirements will help support or challenge causality of the role played by the gut microbiome on human health to develop new, targeted therapies to alleviate disease symptoms to ultimately improve lives and promote good health. F1000 Research Limited 2020-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7217228/ /pubmed/32462081 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15628.3 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Wade KH and Hall LJ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Wade, Kaitlin H.
Hall, Lindsay J.
Improving causality in microbiome research: can human genetic epidemiology help?
title Improving causality in microbiome research: can human genetic epidemiology help?
title_full Improving causality in microbiome research: can human genetic epidemiology help?
title_fullStr Improving causality in microbiome research: can human genetic epidemiology help?
title_full_unstemmed Improving causality in microbiome research: can human genetic epidemiology help?
title_short Improving causality in microbiome research: can human genetic epidemiology help?
title_sort improving causality in microbiome research: can human genetic epidemiology help?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32462081
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15628.3
work_keys_str_mv AT wadekaitlinh improvingcausalityinmicrobiomeresearchcanhumangeneticepidemiologyhelp
AT halllindsayj improvingcausalityinmicrobiomeresearchcanhumangeneticepidemiologyhelp