Cargando…
Improving causality in microbiome research: can human genetic epidemiology help?
Evidence supports associations between human gut microbiome variation and multiple health outcomes and diseases. Despite compelling results from in vivo and in vitro models, few findings have been translated into an understanding of modifiable causal relationships. Furthermore, epidemiological studi...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32462081 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15628.3 |
_version_ | 1783532575438929920 |
---|---|
author | Wade, Kaitlin H. Hall, Lindsay J. |
author_facet | Wade, Kaitlin H. Hall, Lindsay J. |
author_sort | Wade, Kaitlin H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Evidence supports associations between human gut microbiome variation and multiple health outcomes and diseases. Despite compelling results from in vivo and in vitro models, few findings have been translated into an understanding of modifiable causal relationships. Furthermore, epidemiological studies have been unconvincing in their ability to offer causal evidence due to their observational nature, where confounding by lifestyle and behavioural factors, reverse causation and bias are important limitations. Whilst randomized controlled trials have made steps towards understanding the causal role played by the gut microbiome in disease, they are expensive and time-consuming. This evidence that has not been translated between model systems impedes opportunities for harnessing the gut microbiome for improving population health. Therefore, there is a need for alternative approaches to interrogate causality in the context of gut microbiome research. The integration of human genetics within population health sciences have proved successful in facilitating improved causal inference (e.g., with Mendelian randomization [MR] studies) and characterising inherited disease susceptibility. MR is an established method that employs human genetic variation as natural “proxies” for clinically relevant (and ideally modifiable) traits to improve causality in observational associations between those traits and health outcomes. Here, we focus and discuss the utility of MR within the context of human gut microbiome research, review studies that have used this method and consider the strengths, limitations and challenges facing this research. Specifically, we highlight the requirements for careful examination and interpretation of derived causal estimates and host (i.e., human) genetic effects themselves, triangulation across multiple study designs and inter-disciplinary collaborations. Meeting these requirements will help support or challenge causality of the role played by the gut microbiome on human health to develop new, targeted therapies to alleviate disease symptoms to ultimately improve lives and promote good health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7217228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72172282020-05-26 Improving causality in microbiome research: can human genetic epidemiology help? Wade, Kaitlin H. Hall, Lindsay J. Wellcome Open Res Review Evidence supports associations between human gut microbiome variation and multiple health outcomes and diseases. Despite compelling results from in vivo and in vitro models, few findings have been translated into an understanding of modifiable causal relationships. Furthermore, epidemiological studies have been unconvincing in their ability to offer causal evidence due to their observational nature, where confounding by lifestyle and behavioural factors, reverse causation and bias are important limitations. Whilst randomized controlled trials have made steps towards understanding the causal role played by the gut microbiome in disease, they are expensive and time-consuming. This evidence that has not been translated between model systems impedes opportunities for harnessing the gut microbiome for improving population health. Therefore, there is a need for alternative approaches to interrogate causality in the context of gut microbiome research. The integration of human genetics within population health sciences have proved successful in facilitating improved causal inference (e.g., with Mendelian randomization [MR] studies) and characterising inherited disease susceptibility. MR is an established method that employs human genetic variation as natural “proxies” for clinically relevant (and ideally modifiable) traits to improve causality in observational associations between those traits and health outcomes. Here, we focus and discuss the utility of MR within the context of human gut microbiome research, review studies that have used this method and consider the strengths, limitations and challenges facing this research. Specifically, we highlight the requirements for careful examination and interpretation of derived causal estimates and host (i.e., human) genetic effects themselves, triangulation across multiple study designs and inter-disciplinary collaborations. Meeting these requirements will help support or challenge causality of the role played by the gut microbiome on human health to develop new, targeted therapies to alleviate disease symptoms to ultimately improve lives and promote good health. F1000 Research Limited 2020-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7217228/ /pubmed/32462081 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15628.3 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Wade KH and Hall LJ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Wade, Kaitlin H. Hall, Lindsay J. Improving causality in microbiome research: can human genetic epidemiology help? |
title | Improving causality in microbiome research: can human genetic epidemiology help? |
title_full | Improving causality in microbiome research: can human genetic epidemiology help? |
title_fullStr | Improving causality in microbiome research: can human genetic epidemiology help? |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving causality in microbiome research: can human genetic epidemiology help? |
title_short | Improving causality in microbiome research: can human genetic epidemiology help? |
title_sort | improving causality in microbiome research: can human genetic epidemiology help? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32462081 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15628.3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wadekaitlinh improvingcausalityinmicrobiomeresearchcanhumangeneticepidemiologyhelp AT halllindsayj improvingcausalityinmicrobiomeresearchcanhumangeneticepidemiologyhelp |