Cargando…

Evaluating a combined bowel preparation for small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a prospective randomized–controlled study

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is frequently hindered by intra-luminal debris. Our aim was to determine whether a combination bowel preparation would improve small-bowel visualization, diagnostic yield, and the completion rate of CE. METHODS: Single-blind, prospective randomized–controlled study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansel, Stephanie L, Murray, Joseph A, Alexander, Jeffrey A, Bruining, David H, Larson, Mark V, Mangan, Thomas F, Dierkhising, Ross A, Almazar, Ann E, Rajan, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32419949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goz054
_version_ 1783532585301835776
author Hansel, Stephanie L
Murray, Joseph A
Alexander, Jeffrey A
Bruining, David H
Larson, Mark V
Mangan, Thomas F
Dierkhising, Ross A
Almazar, Ann E
Rajan, Elizabeth
author_facet Hansel, Stephanie L
Murray, Joseph A
Alexander, Jeffrey A
Bruining, David H
Larson, Mark V
Mangan, Thomas F
Dierkhising, Ross A
Almazar, Ann E
Rajan, Elizabeth
author_sort Hansel, Stephanie L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is frequently hindered by intra-luminal debris. Our aim was to determine whether a combination bowel preparation would improve small-bowel visualization, diagnostic yield, and the completion rate of CE. METHODS: Single-blind, prospective randomized–controlled study of outpatients scheduled for CE. Bowel-preparation subjects ingested 2 L of polyethylene glycol solution the night prior to CE, 5 mL simethicone and 5 mg metoclopramide 20 minutes prior to CE and laid in the right lateral position 30 minutes after swallowing CE. Controls had no solid food after 7 p.m. the night prior to CE and no liquids 4 hours prior to CE. Participants completed a satisfaction survey. Capsule readers completed a small-bowel-visualization assessment. RESULTS: Fifty patients were prospectively enrolled (56% female) with a median age of 54.4 years and 44 completed the study (23 patients in the control group and 21 in the preparation group). There was no significant difference between groups on quartile-based small-bowel visualization (all P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between groups in diagnostic yield (P = 0.69), mean gastric (P = 0.10) or small-bowel transit time (P = 0.89). The small-bowel completion rate was significantly higher in the preparation group (100% vs 78%; P = 0.02). Bowel-preparation subjects reported significantly more discomfort than controls (62% vs 17%; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Combined bowel preparation did not improve small-bowel visualization but did significantly increase patient discomfort. The CE completion rate improved in the preparation group but the diagnostic yield was unaffected. Based on our findings, a bowel preparation prior to CE does not appear to improve CE performance and results in decreased patient satisfaction (ClinicalTrials.gov, No. NCT01243736).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7217271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72172712020-05-15 Evaluating a combined bowel preparation for small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a prospective randomized–controlled study Hansel, Stephanie L Murray, Joseph A Alexander, Jeffrey A Bruining, David H Larson, Mark V Mangan, Thomas F Dierkhising, Ross A Almazar, Ann E Rajan, Elizabeth Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is frequently hindered by intra-luminal debris. Our aim was to determine whether a combination bowel preparation would improve small-bowel visualization, diagnostic yield, and the completion rate of CE. METHODS: Single-blind, prospective randomized–controlled study of outpatients scheduled for CE. Bowel-preparation subjects ingested 2 L of polyethylene glycol solution the night prior to CE, 5 mL simethicone and 5 mg metoclopramide 20 minutes prior to CE and laid in the right lateral position 30 minutes after swallowing CE. Controls had no solid food after 7 p.m. the night prior to CE and no liquids 4 hours prior to CE. Participants completed a satisfaction survey. Capsule readers completed a small-bowel-visualization assessment. RESULTS: Fifty patients were prospectively enrolled (56% female) with a median age of 54.4 years and 44 completed the study (23 patients in the control group and 21 in the preparation group). There was no significant difference between groups on quartile-based small-bowel visualization (all P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between groups in diagnostic yield (P = 0.69), mean gastric (P = 0.10) or small-bowel transit time (P = 0.89). The small-bowel completion rate was significantly higher in the preparation group (100% vs 78%; P = 0.02). Bowel-preparation subjects reported significantly more discomfort than controls (62% vs 17%; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Combined bowel preparation did not improve small-bowel visualization but did significantly increase patient discomfort. The CE completion rate improved in the preparation group but the diagnostic yield was unaffected. Based on our findings, a bowel preparation prior to CE does not appear to improve CE performance and results in decreased patient satisfaction (ClinicalTrials.gov, No. NCT01243736). Oxford University Press 2019-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7217271/ /pubmed/32419949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goz054 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press and Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hansel, Stephanie L
Murray, Joseph A
Alexander, Jeffrey A
Bruining, David H
Larson, Mark V
Mangan, Thomas F
Dierkhising, Ross A
Almazar, Ann E
Rajan, Elizabeth
Evaluating a combined bowel preparation for small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a prospective randomized–controlled study
title Evaluating a combined bowel preparation for small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a prospective randomized–controlled study
title_full Evaluating a combined bowel preparation for small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a prospective randomized–controlled study
title_fullStr Evaluating a combined bowel preparation for small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a prospective randomized–controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating a combined bowel preparation for small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a prospective randomized–controlled study
title_short Evaluating a combined bowel preparation for small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a prospective randomized–controlled study
title_sort evaluating a combined bowel preparation for small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a prospective randomized–controlled study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32419949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goz054
work_keys_str_mv AT hanselstephaniel evaluatingacombinedbowelpreparationforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT murrayjosepha evaluatingacombinedbowelpreparationforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT alexanderjeffreya evaluatingacombinedbowelpreparationforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT bruiningdavidh evaluatingacombinedbowelpreparationforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT larsonmarkv evaluatingacombinedbowelpreparationforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT manganthomasf evaluatingacombinedbowelpreparationforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT dierkhisingrossa evaluatingacombinedbowelpreparationforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT almazaranne evaluatingacombinedbowelpreparationforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT rajanelizabeth evaluatingacombinedbowelpreparationforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy