Cargando…

Impact of the infectious period on epidemics

The duration of the infectious period is a crucial determinant of the ability of an infectious disease to spread. We consider an epidemic model that is network based and non-Markovian, containing classic Kermack-McKendrick, pairwise, message passing, and spatial models as special cases. For this mod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilkinson, Robert R., Sharkey, Kieran J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Physical Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29906938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.052403
_version_ 1783532618918133760
author Wilkinson, Robert R.
Sharkey, Kieran J.
author_facet Wilkinson, Robert R.
Sharkey, Kieran J.
author_sort Wilkinson, Robert R.
collection PubMed
description The duration of the infectious period is a crucial determinant of the ability of an infectious disease to spread. We consider an epidemic model that is network based and non-Markovian, containing classic Kermack-McKendrick, pairwise, message passing, and spatial models as special cases. For this model, we prove a monotonic relationship between the variability of the infectious period (with fixed mean) and the probability that the infection will reach any given subset of the population by any given time. For certain families of distributions, this result implies that epidemic severity is decreasing with respect to the variance of the infectious period. The striking importance of this relationship is demonstrated numerically. We then prove, with a fixed basic reproductive ratio ([Formula: see text]), a monotonic relationship between the variability of the posterior transmission probability (which is a function of the infectious period) and the probability that the infection will reach any given subset of the population by any given time. Thus again, even when [Formula: see text] is fixed, variability of the infectious period tends to dampen the epidemic. Numerical results illustrate this but indicate the relationship is weaker. We then show how our results apply to message passing, pairwise, and Kermack-McKendrick epidemic models, even when they are not exactly consistent with the stochastic dynamics. For Poissonian contact processes, and arbitrarily distributed infectious periods, we demonstrate how systems of delay differential equations and ordinary differential equations can provide upper and lower bounds, respectively, for the probability that any given individual has been infected by any given time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7217532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Physical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72175322020-05-13 Impact of the infectious period on epidemics Wilkinson, Robert R. Sharkey, Kieran J. Phys Rev E Articles The duration of the infectious period is a crucial determinant of the ability of an infectious disease to spread. We consider an epidemic model that is network based and non-Markovian, containing classic Kermack-McKendrick, pairwise, message passing, and spatial models as special cases. For this model, we prove a monotonic relationship between the variability of the infectious period (with fixed mean) and the probability that the infection will reach any given subset of the population by any given time. For certain families of distributions, this result implies that epidemic severity is decreasing with respect to the variance of the infectious period. The striking importance of this relationship is demonstrated numerically. We then prove, with a fixed basic reproductive ratio ([Formula: see text]), a monotonic relationship between the variability of the posterior transmission probability (which is a function of the infectious period) and the probability that the infection will reach any given subset of the population by any given time. Thus again, even when [Formula: see text] is fixed, variability of the infectious period tends to dampen the epidemic. Numerical results illustrate this but indicate the relationship is weaker. We then show how our results apply to message passing, pairwise, and Kermack-McKendrick epidemic models, even when they are not exactly consistent with the stochastic dynamics. For Poissonian contact processes, and arbitrarily distributed infectious periods, we demonstrate how systems of delay differential equations and ordinary differential equations can provide upper and lower bounds, respectively, for the probability that any given individual has been infected by any given time. American Physical Society 2018-05-11 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7217532/ /pubmed/29906938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.052403 Text en Published by the American Physical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.
spellingShingle Articles
Wilkinson, Robert R.
Sharkey, Kieran J.
Impact of the infectious period on epidemics
title Impact of the infectious period on epidemics
title_full Impact of the infectious period on epidemics
title_fullStr Impact of the infectious period on epidemics
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the infectious period on epidemics
title_short Impact of the infectious period on epidemics
title_sort impact of the infectious period on epidemics
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29906938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.052403
work_keys_str_mv AT wilkinsonrobertr impactoftheinfectiousperiodonepidemics
AT sharkeykieranj impactoftheinfectiousperiodonepidemics