Cargando…

Do AKT1, COMT and FAAH influence reports of acute cannabis intoxication experiences in patients with first episode psychosis, controls and young adult cannabis users?

Epidemiological and biological evidence support the association between heavy cannabis use and psychosis. However, it is unclear which cannabis users are susceptible to its psychotogenic effect. Therefore, understanding genetic factors contributing to this relationship might prove an important strat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hindocha, Chandni, Quattrone, Diego, Freeman, Tom P., Murray, Robin M., Mondelli, Valeria, Breen, Gerome, Curtis, Charles, Morgan, Celia J. A., Valerie Curran, H., Di Forti, Marta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32398646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-0823-9
_version_ 1783532672774045696
author Hindocha, Chandni
Quattrone, Diego
Freeman, Tom P.
Murray, Robin M.
Mondelli, Valeria
Breen, Gerome
Curtis, Charles
Morgan, Celia J. A.
Valerie Curran, H.
Di Forti, Marta
author_facet Hindocha, Chandni
Quattrone, Diego
Freeman, Tom P.
Murray, Robin M.
Mondelli, Valeria
Breen, Gerome
Curtis, Charles
Morgan, Celia J. A.
Valerie Curran, H.
Di Forti, Marta
author_sort Hindocha, Chandni
collection PubMed
description Epidemiological and biological evidence support the association between heavy cannabis use and psychosis. However, it is unclear which cannabis users are susceptible to its psychotogenic effect. Therefore, understanding genetic factors contributing to this relationship might prove an important strategy to identify the mechanisms underlying cannabis-associated psychotic experiences. We aimed to determine how variation in AKT1, COMT and FAAH genotypes, and their interaction with three different groups (first episode psychosis (FEP) patients (n = 143), controls (n = 92) and young adult (YA) cannabis users n = 485)) influenced cannabis experiences, in those who had used cannabis at least once. We investigated the role of AKT1 (rs2494732), COMT Val158Met (rs4680) and FAAH (rs324420) on cannabis experiences by combining data from a large case-control study of FEP patients, with a naturalistic study of YA cannabis users (n = 720). Outcome measures were cannabis-induced psychotic-like experiences (cPLEs) and euphoric experiences (cEEs). We used linear mixed effects models to assess the effects of each genotype and their interaction with group, adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, age of first cannabis use, years of use and frequency. cPLEs were more frequent in FEP patients than controls and YA cannabis users. cEEs were more prevalent in YA cannabis users than FEP patients or controls. Variation in AKT1, COMT or FAAH was not associated with cPLEs/cEEs. There was no interaction between genotype and group (FEP cases, controls and YA cannabis users) on cPLEs/cEEs. In conclusion, AKT1, COMT or FAAH did not modulate specific psychotomimetic response to cannabis and did not interact with group, contrary to previous research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7217850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72178502020-05-14 Do AKT1, COMT and FAAH influence reports of acute cannabis intoxication experiences in patients with first episode psychosis, controls and young adult cannabis users? Hindocha, Chandni Quattrone, Diego Freeman, Tom P. Murray, Robin M. Mondelli, Valeria Breen, Gerome Curtis, Charles Morgan, Celia J. A. Valerie Curran, H. Di Forti, Marta Transl Psychiatry Article Epidemiological and biological evidence support the association between heavy cannabis use and psychosis. However, it is unclear which cannabis users are susceptible to its psychotogenic effect. Therefore, understanding genetic factors contributing to this relationship might prove an important strategy to identify the mechanisms underlying cannabis-associated psychotic experiences. We aimed to determine how variation in AKT1, COMT and FAAH genotypes, and their interaction with three different groups (first episode psychosis (FEP) patients (n = 143), controls (n = 92) and young adult (YA) cannabis users n = 485)) influenced cannabis experiences, in those who had used cannabis at least once. We investigated the role of AKT1 (rs2494732), COMT Val158Met (rs4680) and FAAH (rs324420) on cannabis experiences by combining data from a large case-control study of FEP patients, with a naturalistic study of YA cannabis users (n = 720). Outcome measures were cannabis-induced psychotic-like experiences (cPLEs) and euphoric experiences (cEEs). We used linear mixed effects models to assess the effects of each genotype and their interaction with group, adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, age of first cannabis use, years of use and frequency. cPLEs were more frequent in FEP patients than controls and YA cannabis users. cEEs were more prevalent in YA cannabis users than FEP patients or controls. Variation in AKT1, COMT or FAAH was not associated with cPLEs/cEEs. There was no interaction between genotype and group (FEP cases, controls and YA cannabis users) on cPLEs/cEEs. In conclusion, AKT1, COMT or FAAH did not modulate specific psychotomimetic response to cannabis and did not interact with group, contrary to previous research. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7217850/ /pubmed/32398646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-0823-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Hindocha, Chandni
Quattrone, Diego
Freeman, Tom P.
Murray, Robin M.
Mondelli, Valeria
Breen, Gerome
Curtis, Charles
Morgan, Celia J. A.
Valerie Curran, H.
Di Forti, Marta
Do AKT1, COMT and FAAH influence reports of acute cannabis intoxication experiences in patients with first episode psychosis, controls and young adult cannabis users?
title Do AKT1, COMT and FAAH influence reports of acute cannabis intoxication experiences in patients with first episode psychosis, controls and young adult cannabis users?
title_full Do AKT1, COMT and FAAH influence reports of acute cannabis intoxication experiences in patients with first episode psychosis, controls and young adult cannabis users?
title_fullStr Do AKT1, COMT and FAAH influence reports of acute cannabis intoxication experiences in patients with first episode psychosis, controls and young adult cannabis users?
title_full_unstemmed Do AKT1, COMT and FAAH influence reports of acute cannabis intoxication experiences in patients with first episode psychosis, controls and young adult cannabis users?
title_short Do AKT1, COMT and FAAH influence reports of acute cannabis intoxication experiences in patients with first episode psychosis, controls and young adult cannabis users?
title_sort do akt1, comt and faah influence reports of acute cannabis intoxication experiences in patients with first episode psychosis, controls and young adult cannabis users?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32398646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-0823-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hindochachandni doakt1comtandfaahinfluencereportsofacutecannabisintoxicationexperiencesinpatientswithfirstepisodepsychosiscontrolsandyoungadultcannabisusers
AT quattronediego doakt1comtandfaahinfluencereportsofacutecannabisintoxicationexperiencesinpatientswithfirstepisodepsychosiscontrolsandyoungadultcannabisusers
AT freemantomp doakt1comtandfaahinfluencereportsofacutecannabisintoxicationexperiencesinpatientswithfirstepisodepsychosiscontrolsandyoungadultcannabisusers
AT murrayrobinm doakt1comtandfaahinfluencereportsofacutecannabisintoxicationexperiencesinpatientswithfirstepisodepsychosiscontrolsandyoungadultcannabisusers
AT mondellivaleria doakt1comtandfaahinfluencereportsofacutecannabisintoxicationexperiencesinpatientswithfirstepisodepsychosiscontrolsandyoungadultcannabisusers
AT breengerome doakt1comtandfaahinfluencereportsofacutecannabisintoxicationexperiencesinpatientswithfirstepisodepsychosiscontrolsandyoungadultcannabisusers
AT curtischarles doakt1comtandfaahinfluencereportsofacutecannabisintoxicationexperiencesinpatientswithfirstepisodepsychosiscontrolsandyoungadultcannabisusers
AT morganceliaja doakt1comtandfaahinfluencereportsofacutecannabisintoxicationexperiencesinpatientswithfirstepisodepsychosiscontrolsandyoungadultcannabisusers
AT valeriecurranh doakt1comtandfaahinfluencereportsofacutecannabisintoxicationexperiencesinpatientswithfirstepisodepsychosiscontrolsandyoungadultcannabisusers
AT difortimarta doakt1comtandfaahinfluencereportsofacutecannabisintoxicationexperiencesinpatientswithfirstepisodepsychosiscontrolsandyoungadultcannabisusers