Cargando…

The prognostic significance of immune microenvironment in breast ductal carcinoma in situ

BACKGROUND: The role of different subtypes of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is still poorly defined. This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of B and T lymphocytes and immune checkpoint proteins expression in DCIS. METHODS: A well cha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toss, Michael S., Abidi, Asima, Lesche, Dorothea, Joseph, Chitra, Mahale, Sakshi, Saunders, Hugo, Kader, Tanjina, Miligy, Islam M., Green, Andrew R., Gorringe, Kylie L., Rakha, Emad A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32203210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0797-7
_version_ 1783532683577524224
author Toss, Michael S.
Abidi, Asima
Lesche, Dorothea
Joseph, Chitra
Mahale, Sakshi
Saunders, Hugo
Kader, Tanjina
Miligy, Islam M.
Green, Andrew R.
Gorringe, Kylie L.
Rakha, Emad A.
author_facet Toss, Michael S.
Abidi, Asima
Lesche, Dorothea
Joseph, Chitra
Mahale, Sakshi
Saunders, Hugo
Kader, Tanjina
Miligy, Islam M.
Green, Andrew R.
Gorringe, Kylie L.
Rakha, Emad A.
author_sort Toss, Michael S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The role of different subtypes of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is still poorly defined. This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of B and T lymphocytes and immune checkpoint proteins expression in DCIS. METHODS: A well characterised DCIS cohort (n = 700) with long-term follow-up comprising pure DCIS (n = 508) and DCIS mixed with invasive carcinoma (IBC; n = 192) were stained immunohistochemically for CD20, CD3, CD4, CD8, FOXP3, PD1 and PDL1. Copy number variation and TP53 mutation status were assessed in a subset of cases (n = 58). RESULTS: CD3+ lymphocytes were the predominant cell subtype in the pure DCIS cohort, while FOXP3 showed the lowest levels. PDL1 expression was mainly seen in the stromal TILs. Higher abundance of TILs subtypes was associated with higher tumour grade, hormone receptor negativity and HER2 positivity. Mutant TP53 variants were associated with higher levels of stromal CD3+, CD4+ and FOXP3+ cells. DCIS coexisting with invasive carcinoma harboured denser stromal infiltrates of all immune cells and checkpoint proteins apart from CD4+ cells. Stromal PD1 was the most differentially expressed protein between DCIS and invasive carcinoma (Z = 5.8, p < 0.0001). Dense TILs, stromal FOXP3 and PDL1 were poor prognostic factors for DCIS recurrence, while dense TILs were independently associated with poor outcome for all recurrences (HR = 7.0; p = 0.024), and invasive recurrence (HR = 2.1; p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppressive proteins are potential markers for high risk DCIS and disease progression. Different stromal and intratumoural lymphocyte composition between pure DCIS, DCIS associated with IBC and invasive carcinoma play a potential role in their prognostic significance and related to the underlying genomic instability. Assessment of overall TILs provides a promising tool for evaluation of the DCIS immune microenvironment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7217899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72178992021-03-17 The prognostic significance of immune microenvironment in breast ductal carcinoma in situ Toss, Michael S. Abidi, Asima Lesche, Dorothea Joseph, Chitra Mahale, Sakshi Saunders, Hugo Kader, Tanjina Miligy, Islam M. Green, Andrew R. Gorringe, Kylie L. Rakha, Emad A. Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: The role of different subtypes of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is still poorly defined. This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of B and T lymphocytes and immune checkpoint proteins expression in DCIS. METHODS: A well characterised DCIS cohort (n = 700) with long-term follow-up comprising pure DCIS (n = 508) and DCIS mixed with invasive carcinoma (IBC; n = 192) were stained immunohistochemically for CD20, CD3, CD4, CD8, FOXP3, PD1 and PDL1. Copy number variation and TP53 mutation status were assessed in a subset of cases (n = 58). RESULTS: CD3+ lymphocytes were the predominant cell subtype in the pure DCIS cohort, while FOXP3 showed the lowest levels. PDL1 expression was mainly seen in the stromal TILs. Higher abundance of TILs subtypes was associated with higher tumour grade, hormone receptor negativity and HER2 positivity. Mutant TP53 variants were associated with higher levels of stromal CD3+, CD4+ and FOXP3+ cells. DCIS coexisting with invasive carcinoma harboured denser stromal infiltrates of all immune cells and checkpoint proteins apart from CD4+ cells. Stromal PD1 was the most differentially expressed protein between DCIS and invasive carcinoma (Z = 5.8, p < 0.0001). Dense TILs, stromal FOXP3 and PDL1 were poor prognostic factors for DCIS recurrence, while dense TILs were independently associated with poor outcome for all recurrences (HR = 7.0; p = 0.024), and invasive recurrence (HR = 2.1; p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppressive proteins are potential markers for high risk DCIS and disease progression. Different stromal and intratumoural lymphocyte composition between pure DCIS, DCIS associated with IBC and invasive carcinoma play a potential role in their prognostic significance and related to the underlying genomic instability. Assessment of overall TILs provides a promising tool for evaluation of the DCIS immune microenvironment. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-03-17 2020-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7217899/ /pubmed/32203210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0797-7 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Cancer Research UK 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Note This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
spellingShingle Article
Toss, Michael S.
Abidi, Asima
Lesche, Dorothea
Joseph, Chitra
Mahale, Sakshi
Saunders, Hugo
Kader, Tanjina
Miligy, Islam M.
Green, Andrew R.
Gorringe, Kylie L.
Rakha, Emad A.
The prognostic significance of immune microenvironment in breast ductal carcinoma in situ
title The prognostic significance of immune microenvironment in breast ductal carcinoma in situ
title_full The prognostic significance of immune microenvironment in breast ductal carcinoma in situ
title_fullStr The prognostic significance of immune microenvironment in breast ductal carcinoma in situ
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic significance of immune microenvironment in breast ductal carcinoma in situ
title_short The prognostic significance of immune microenvironment in breast ductal carcinoma in situ
title_sort prognostic significance of immune microenvironment in breast ductal carcinoma in situ
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32203210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0797-7
work_keys_str_mv AT tossmichaels theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT abidiasima theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT leschedorothea theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT josephchitra theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT mahalesakshi theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT saundershugo theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT kadertanjina theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT miligyislamm theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT greenandrewr theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT gorringekyliel theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT rakhaemada theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT tossmichaels prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT abidiasima prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT leschedorothea prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT josephchitra prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT mahalesakshi prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT saundershugo prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT kadertanjina prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT miligyislamm prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT greenandrewr prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT gorringekyliel prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu
AT rakhaemada prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu