Cargando…
The prognostic significance of immune microenvironment in breast ductal carcinoma in situ
BACKGROUND: The role of different subtypes of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is still poorly defined. This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of B and T lymphocytes and immune checkpoint proteins expression in DCIS. METHODS: A well cha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32203210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0797-7 |
_version_ | 1783532683577524224 |
---|---|
author | Toss, Michael S. Abidi, Asima Lesche, Dorothea Joseph, Chitra Mahale, Sakshi Saunders, Hugo Kader, Tanjina Miligy, Islam M. Green, Andrew R. Gorringe, Kylie L. Rakha, Emad A. |
author_facet | Toss, Michael S. Abidi, Asima Lesche, Dorothea Joseph, Chitra Mahale, Sakshi Saunders, Hugo Kader, Tanjina Miligy, Islam M. Green, Andrew R. Gorringe, Kylie L. Rakha, Emad A. |
author_sort | Toss, Michael S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The role of different subtypes of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is still poorly defined. This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of B and T lymphocytes and immune checkpoint proteins expression in DCIS. METHODS: A well characterised DCIS cohort (n = 700) with long-term follow-up comprising pure DCIS (n = 508) and DCIS mixed with invasive carcinoma (IBC; n = 192) were stained immunohistochemically for CD20, CD3, CD4, CD8, FOXP3, PD1 and PDL1. Copy number variation and TP53 mutation status were assessed in a subset of cases (n = 58). RESULTS: CD3+ lymphocytes were the predominant cell subtype in the pure DCIS cohort, while FOXP3 showed the lowest levels. PDL1 expression was mainly seen in the stromal TILs. Higher abundance of TILs subtypes was associated with higher tumour grade, hormone receptor negativity and HER2 positivity. Mutant TP53 variants were associated with higher levels of stromal CD3+, CD4+ and FOXP3+ cells. DCIS coexisting with invasive carcinoma harboured denser stromal infiltrates of all immune cells and checkpoint proteins apart from CD4+ cells. Stromal PD1 was the most differentially expressed protein between DCIS and invasive carcinoma (Z = 5.8, p < 0.0001). Dense TILs, stromal FOXP3 and PDL1 were poor prognostic factors for DCIS recurrence, while dense TILs were independently associated with poor outcome for all recurrences (HR = 7.0; p = 0.024), and invasive recurrence (HR = 2.1; p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppressive proteins are potential markers for high risk DCIS and disease progression. Different stromal and intratumoural lymphocyte composition between pure DCIS, DCIS associated with IBC and invasive carcinoma play a potential role in their prognostic significance and related to the underlying genomic instability. Assessment of overall TILs provides a promising tool for evaluation of the DCIS immune microenvironment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7217899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72178992021-03-17 The prognostic significance of immune microenvironment in breast ductal carcinoma in situ Toss, Michael S. Abidi, Asima Lesche, Dorothea Joseph, Chitra Mahale, Sakshi Saunders, Hugo Kader, Tanjina Miligy, Islam M. Green, Andrew R. Gorringe, Kylie L. Rakha, Emad A. Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: The role of different subtypes of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is still poorly defined. This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of B and T lymphocytes and immune checkpoint proteins expression in DCIS. METHODS: A well characterised DCIS cohort (n = 700) with long-term follow-up comprising pure DCIS (n = 508) and DCIS mixed with invasive carcinoma (IBC; n = 192) were stained immunohistochemically for CD20, CD3, CD4, CD8, FOXP3, PD1 and PDL1. Copy number variation and TP53 mutation status were assessed in a subset of cases (n = 58). RESULTS: CD3+ lymphocytes were the predominant cell subtype in the pure DCIS cohort, while FOXP3 showed the lowest levels. PDL1 expression was mainly seen in the stromal TILs. Higher abundance of TILs subtypes was associated with higher tumour grade, hormone receptor negativity and HER2 positivity. Mutant TP53 variants were associated with higher levels of stromal CD3+, CD4+ and FOXP3+ cells. DCIS coexisting with invasive carcinoma harboured denser stromal infiltrates of all immune cells and checkpoint proteins apart from CD4+ cells. Stromal PD1 was the most differentially expressed protein between DCIS and invasive carcinoma (Z = 5.8, p < 0.0001). Dense TILs, stromal FOXP3 and PDL1 were poor prognostic factors for DCIS recurrence, while dense TILs were independently associated with poor outcome for all recurrences (HR = 7.0; p = 0.024), and invasive recurrence (HR = 2.1; p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppressive proteins are potential markers for high risk DCIS and disease progression. Different stromal and intratumoural lymphocyte composition between pure DCIS, DCIS associated with IBC and invasive carcinoma play a potential role in their prognostic significance and related to the underlying genomic instability. Assessment of overall TILs provides a promising tool for evaluation of the DCIS immune microenvironment. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-03-17 2020-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7217899/ /pubmed/32203210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0797-7 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Cancer Research UK 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Note This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). |
spellingShingle | Article Toss, Michael S. Abidi, Asima Lesche, Dorothea Joseph, Chitra Mahale, Sakshi Saunders, Hugo Kader, Tanjina Miligy, Islam M. Green, Andrew R. Gorringe, Kylie L. Rakha, Emad A. The prognostic significance of immune microenvironment in breast ductal carcinoma in situ |
title | The prognostic significance of immune microenvironment in breast ductal carcinoma in situ |
title_full | The prognostic significance of immune microenvironment in breast ductal carcinoma in situ |
title_fullStr | The prognostic significance of immune microenvironment in breast ductal carcinoma in situ |
title_full_unstemmed | The prognostic significance of immune microenvironment in breast ductal carcinoma in situ |
title_short | The prognostic significance of immune microenvironment in breast ductal carcinoma in situ |
title_sort | prognostic significance of immune microenvironment in breast ductal carcinoma in situ |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32203210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-0797-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tossmichaels theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT abidiasima theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT leschedorothea theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT josephchitra theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT mahalesakshi theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT saundershugo theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT kadertanjina theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT miligyislamm theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT greenandrewr theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT gorringekyliel theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT rakhaemada theprognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT tossmichaels prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT abidiasima prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT leschedorothea prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT josephchitra prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT mahalesakshi prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT saundershugo prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT kadertanjina prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT miligyislamm prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT greenandrewr prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT gorringekyliel prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu AT rakhaemada prognosticsignificanceofimmunemicroenvironmentinbreastductalcarcinomainsitu |