Cargando…

A Pilot Study Comparing Aortic Valve Area Estimates Derived from Fick Cardiac Output with Estimates Based on Cheetah-NICOM Cardiac Output

Cardiac output during cardiac catheterization is often estimated using the modified Fick method (CO(Fick)). In this proof-of-concept, prospective non-randomized study carried out in a single academic healthcare centre, we examined whether replacing CO(Fick) in the Gorlin formula with Cheetah-NICOM m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mitrev, Ludmil, van Helmond, Noud, Kaddissi, Georges, Awad, Ahmed, Patel, Kinjal, Aji, Janah, Ogbara, Jeffrey, Rafeq, Zahi, Nagubandi, Vineeth, Orr, Debbie, Gaughan, John, Rosenbloom, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32398730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64753-3
_version_ 1783532691583401984
author Mitrev, Ludmil
van Helmond, Noud
Kaddissi, Georges
Awad, Ahmed
Patel, Kinjal
Aji, Janah
Ogbara, Jeffrey
Rafeq, Zahi
Nagubandi, Vineeth
Orr, Debbie
Gaughan, John
Rosenbloom, Michael
author_facet Mitrev, Ludmil
van Helmond, Noud
Kaddissi, Georges
Awad, Ahmed
Patel, Kinjal
Aji, Janah
Ogbara, Jeffrey
Rafeq, Zahi
Nagubandi, Vineeth
Orr, Debbie
Gaughan, John
Rosenbloom, Michael
author_sort Mitrev, Ludmil
collection PubMed
description Cardiac output during cardiac catheterization is often estimated using the modified Fick method (CO(Fick)). In this proof-of-concept, prospective non-randomized study carried out in a single academic healthcare centre, we examined whether replacing CO(Fick) in the Gorlin formula with Cheetah-NICOM monitor cardiac output (CO(Cheetah)) could produce an accurate and precise estimate of aortic valve area in patients with severe aortic stenosis. In twenty-six subjects, CO(Fick) and CO(Cheetah) were obtained concurrently. A spot and 3-minute running average of CO(Cheetah) was used. Bland and Altman analysis was used to derive bias, 95% limits of agreement (LOA) and confidence intervals (CI). The mean difference (bias) between AVA(Cheetah) (average) and AVA(Fick) was 0.11 cm(2) and the 95% LOA were ±0.42 cm(2). The 95% CI of the bias was 0.02–0.2 cm(2). The bias and 95% LOA of AVA(Cheetah) (spot value) were 0.14 ± 0.42cm(2), with a 95% CI of 0.06–0.23 cm(2). No proportional bias was present. AVA(Cheetah) thus appears to be a reasonably accurate measure of AVA in patients with severe aortic stenosis compared to AVA(Fick) measured using a modified Fick CO. However, the limits of agreement were not narrow enough to consider AVA(Cheetah) and AVA(Fick) interchangeable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7217935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72179352020-05-19 A Pilot Study Comparing Aortic Valve Area Estimates Derived from Fick Cardiac Output with Estimates Based on Cheetah-NICOM Cardiac Output Mitrev, Ludmil van Helmond, Noud Kaddissi, Georges Awad, Ahmed Patel, Kinjal Aji, Janah Ogbara, Jeffrey Rafeq, Zahi Nagubandi, Vineeth Orr, Debbie Gaughan, John Rosenbloom, Michael Sci Rep Article Cardiac output during cardiac catheterization is often estimated using the modified Fick method (CO(Fick)). In this proof-of-concept, prospective non-randomized study carried out in a single academic healthcare centre, we examined whether replacing CO(Fick) in the Gorlin formula with Cheetah-NICOM monitor cardiac output (CO(Cheetah)) could produce an accurate and precise estimate of aortic valve area in patients with severe aortic stenosis. In twenty-six subjects, CO(Fick) and CO(Cheetah) were obtained concurrently. A spot and 3-minute running average of CO(Cheetah) was used. Bland and Altman analysis was used to derive bias, 95% limits of agreement (LOA) and confidence intervals (CI). The mean difference (bias) between AVA(Cheetah) (average) and AVA(Fick) was 0.11 cm(2) and the 95% LOA were ±0.42 cm(2). The 95% CI of the bias was 0.02–0.2 cm(2). The bias and 95% LOA of AVA(Cheetah) (spot value) were 0.14 ± 0.42cm(2), with a 95% CI of 0.06–0.23 cm(2). No proportional bias was present. AVA(Cheetah) thus appears to be a reasonably accurate measure of AVA in patients with severe aortic stenosis compared to AVA(Fick) measured using a modified Fick CO. However, the limits of agreement were not narrow enough to consider AVA(Cheetah) and AVA(Fick) interchangeable. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7217935/ /pubmed/32398730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64753-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Mitrev, Ludmil
van Helmond, Noud
Kaddissi, Georges
Awad, Ahmed
Patel, Kinjal
Aji, Janah
Ogbara, Jeffrey
Rafeq, Zahi
Nagubandi, Vineeth
Orr, Debbie
Gaughan, John
Rosenbloom, Michael
A Pilot Study Comparing Aortic Valve Area Estimates Derived from Fick Cardiac Output with Estimates Based on Cheetah-NICOM Cardiac Output
title A Pilot Study Comparing Aortic Valve Area Estimates Derived from Fick Cardiac Output with Estimates Based on Cheetah-NICOM Cardiac Output
title_full A Pilot Study Comparing Aortic Valve Area Estimates Derived from Fick Cardiac Output with Estimates Based on Cheetah-NICOM Cardiac Output
title_fullStr A Pilot Study Comparing Aortic Valve Area Estimates Derived from Fick Cardiac Output with Estimates Based on Cheetah-NICOM Cardiac Output
title_full_unstemmed A Pilot Study Comparing Aortic Valve Area Estimates Derived from Fick Cardiac Output with Estimates Based on Cheetah-NICOM Cardiac Output
title_short A Pilot Study Comparing Aortic Valve Area Estimates Derived from Fick Cardiac Output with Estimates Based on Cheetah-NICOM Cardiac Output
title_sort pilot study comparing aortic valve area estimates derived from fick cardiac output with estimates based on cheetah-nicom cardiac output
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7217935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32398730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64753-3
work_keys_str_mv AT mitrevludmil apilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT vanhelmondnoud apilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT kaddissigeorges apilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT awadahmed apilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT patelkinjal apilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT ajijanah apilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT ogbarajeffrey apilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT rafeqzahi apilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT nagubandivineeth apilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT orrdebbie apilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT gaughanjohn apilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT rosenbloommichael apilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT mitrevludmil pilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT vanhelmondnoud pilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT kaddissigeorges pilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT awadahmed pilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT patelkinjal pilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT ajijanah pilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT ogbarajeffrey pilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT rafeqzahi pilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT nagubandivineeth pilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT orrdebbie pilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT gaughanjohn pilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput
AT rosenbloommichael pilotstudycomparingaorticvalveareaestimatesderivedfromfickcardiacoutputwithestimatesbasedoncheetahnicomcardiacoutput