Cargando…

Assessing and Interpreting the Metagenome Heterogeneity With Power Law

There are two major sequencing technologies for investigating the microbiome: the amplicon sequencing that generates the OTU (operational taxonomic unit) tables of marker genes (e.g., bacterial 16S-rRNA), and the metagenomic shotgun sequencing that generates metagenomic gene abundance (MGA) tables....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ma, Zhanshan (Sam)
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7218080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435232
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00648
_version_ 1783532722282561536
author Ma, Zhanshan (Sam)
author_facet Ma, Zhanshan (Sam)
author_sort Ma, Zhanshan (Sam)
collection PubMed
description There are two major sequencing technologies for investigating the microbiome: the amplicon sequencing that generates the OTU (operational taxonomic unit) tables of marker genes (e.g., bacterial 16S-rRNA), and the metagenomic shotgun sequencing that generates metagenomic gene abundance (MGA) tables. The OTU table is the counterpart of species abundance tables in macrobial ecology of plants and animals, and has been the target of numerous ecological and network analyses in recent gold rush for microbiome research and in great efforts for establishing an inclusive theoretical ecology. Nevertheless, MGA analyses have been largely limited to bioinformatics pipelines and ad hoc statistical methods, and systematic approaches to MGAs guided by classic ecological theories are still few. Here, we argue that, the difference between “gene kinds” and “gene species” are nominal, and the metagenome that a microbiota carries is essentially a ‘community’ of metagenomic genes (MGs). Each row of a MGA table represents a metagenome of a microbiota, and the whole MGA table represents a ‘meta-metagenome’ (or an assemblage of metagenomes) of N microbiotas (microbiome samples). Consequently, the same ecological/network analyses used in OTU analyses should be equally applicable to MGA tables. Here we choose to analyze the heterogeneity of metagenome by introducing classic Taylor’s power law (TPL) and its recent extensions in community ecology. Heterogeneity is a fundamental property of metagenome, particularly in the context of human microbiomes. Recent studies have shown that the heterogeneity of human metagenomes is far more significant than that of human genomes. Therefore, without deep understanding of the human metagenome heterogeneity, personalized medicine of the human microbiome-associated diseases is hardly feasible. The TPL extensions have been successfully applied to measure the heterogeneity of human microbiome based on amplicon-sequencing reads of marker genes (e.g., 16s-rRNA). In this article, we demonstrate the analysis of the metagenomic heterogeneity of human gut microbiome at whole metagenome scale (with type-I power law extension) and metagenomic gene scale (type-III), as well as the heterogeneity of gene clusters, respectively. We further examine the influences of obesity, IBD and diabetes on the heterogeneity, which is of important ramifications for the diagnosis and treatment of human microbiome-associated diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7218080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72180802020-05-20 Assessing and Interpreting the Metagenome Heterogeneity With Power Law Ma, Zhanshan (Sam) Front Microbiol Microbiology There are two major sequencing technologies for investigating the microbiome: the amplicon sequencing that generates the OTU (operational taxonomic unit) tables of marker genes (e.g., bacterial 16S-rRNA), and the metagenomic shotgun sequencing that generates metagenomic gene abundance (MGA) tables. The OTU table is the counterpart of species abundance tables in macrobial ecology of plants and animals, and has been the target of numerous ecological and network analyses in recent gold rush for microbiome research and in great efforts for establishing an inclusive theoretical ecology. Nevertheless, MGA analyses have been largely limited to bioinformatics pipelines and ad hoc statistical methods, and systematic approaches to MGAs guided by classic ecological theories are still few. Here, we argue that, the difference between “gene kinds” and “gene species” are nominal, and the metagenome that a microbiota carries is essentially a ‘community’ of metagenomic genes (MGs). Each row of a MGA table represents a metagenome of a microbiota, and the whole MGA table represents a ‘meta-metagenome’ (or an assemblage of metagenomes) of N microbiotas (microbiome samples). Consequently, the same ecological/network analyses used in OTU analyses should be equally applicable to MGA tables. Here we choose to analyze the heterogeneity of metagenome by introducing classic Taylor’s power law (TPL) and its recent extensions in community ecology. Heterogeneity is a fundamental property of metagenome, particularly in the context of human microbiomes. Recent studies have shown that the heterogeneity of human metagenomes is far more significant than that of human genomes. Therefore, without deep understanding of the human metagenome heterogeneity, personalized medicine of the human microbiome-associated diseases is hardly feasible. The TPL extensions have been successfully applied to measure the heterogeneity of human microbiome based on amplicon-sequencing reads of marker genes (e.g., 16s-rRNA). In this article, we demonstrate the analysis of the metagenomic heterogeneity of human gut microbiome at whole metagenome scale (with type-I power law extension) and metagenomic gene scale (type-III), as well as the heterogeneity of gene clusters, respectively. We further examine the influences of obesity, IBD and diabetes on the heterogeneity, which is of important ramifications for the diagnosis and treatment of human microbiome-associated diseases. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7218080/ /pubmed/32435232 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00648 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ma. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Ma, Zhanshan (Sam)
Assessing and Interpreting the Metagenome Heterogeneity With Power Law
title Assessing and Interpreting the Metagenome Heterogeneity With Power Law
title_full Assessing and Interpreting the Metagenome Heterogeneity With Power Law
title_fullStr Assessing and Interpreting the Metagenome Heterogeneity With Power Law
title_full_unstemmed Assessing and Interpreting the Metagenome Heterogeneity With Power Law
title_short Assessing and Interpreting the Metagenome Heterogeneity With Power Law
title_sort assessing and interpreting the metagenome heterogeneity with power law
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7218080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435232
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00648
work_keys_str_mv AT mazhanshansam assessingandinterpretingthemetagenomeheterogeneitywithpowerlaw