Cargando…

A Comparative Study of Food Source Selection in Stingless Bees and Honeybees: Scent Marks, Location, or Color

In social bees, the choice of food sources is based on several factors, including scent marks, color, and location of flowers. Here, we used similar setups, in which two stingless bee species, Melipona subnitida and Plebeia flavocincta, and the Western honeybee, Apis mellifera, were tested regarding...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koethe, Sebastian, Fischbach, Vivian, Banysch, Sarah, Reinartz, Lara, Hrncir, Michael, Lunau, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7218124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435253
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00516
_version_ 1783532732384542720
author Koethe, Sebastian
Fischbach, Vivian
Banysch, Sarah
Reinartz, Lara
Hrncir, Michael
Lunau, Klaus
author_facet Koethe, Sebastian
Fischbach, Vivian
Banysch, Sarah
Reinartz, Lara
Hrncir, Michael
Lunau, Klaus
author_sort Koethe, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description In social bees, the choice of food sources is based on several factors, including scent marks, color, and location of flowers. Here, we used similar setups, in which two stingless bee species, Melipona subnitida and Plebeia flavocincta, and the Western honeybee, Apis mellifera, were tested regarding the importance of chemical cues, color cues, and location-dependent cues for foraging behavior. It was determined whether workers chose food sources according to (1) scent marks deposited by conspecifics, (2) the color hue of a food source, (3) the trained location or the proximity of a food source to the hive. All three species preferred the scent-marked over an unmarked feeder that was presented simultaneously, but M. subnitida showed a weaker preference compared to the other species. When trained to blue feeders all three bee species preferred blue, but A. mellifera showed the strongest fidelity. The training to yellow feeders led to less distinct color choices. Only workers of M. subnitida mostly orientated at the training position and the close proximity to the nest. Whether the distance of a feeding site influenced the choice was dependent on the tested parameter (color or scent marks) and the species. Workers of M. subnitida preferably visited the feeder closer to the nest during the scent mark trials, but choose randomly when tested for color learning. Worker honeybees preferred the closer feeding site if trained to yellow, but not if trained to blue, and preferred the more distant feeder during the scent mark trials. Workers of P. flavocincta preferred the closer feeder if trained to blue or yellow, and preferred the more distant feeder during the scent mark trials. The disparity among the species corresponds to differences in body size. Smaller bees are known for reduced visual capabilities and might rely less on visual parameters of the target such as color hue, saturation, or brightness but use scent cues instead. Moreover, the dim-light conditions in forest habitats might reduce the reliability of visual orientation as compared to olfactory orientation. Honeybees showed the most pronounced orientation at floral color cues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7218124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72181242020-05-20 A Comparative Study of Food Source Selection in Stingless Bees and Honeybees: Scent Marks, Location, or Color Koethe, Sebastian Fischbach, Vivian Banysch, Sarah Reinartz, Lara Hrncir, Michael Lunau, Klaus Front Plant Sci Plant Science In social bees, the choice of food sources is based on several factors, including scent marks, color, and location of flowers. Here, we used similar setups, in which two stingless bee species, Melipona subnitida and Plebeia flavocincta, and the Western honeybee, Apis mellifera, were tested regarding the importance of chemical cues, color cues, and location-dependent cues for foraging behavior. It was determined whether workers chose food sources according to (1) scent marks deposited by conspecifics, (2) the color hue of a food source, (3) the trained location or the proximity of a food source to the hive. All three species preferred the scent-marked over an unmarked feeder that was presented simultaneously, but M. subnitida showed a weaker preference compared to the other species. When trained to blue feeders all three bee species preferred blue, but A. mellifera showed the strongest fidelity. The training to yellow feeders led to less distinct color choices. Only workers of M. subnitida mostly orientated at the training position and the close proximity to the nest. Whether the distance of a feeding site influenced the choice was dependent on the tested parameter (color or scent marks) and the species. Workers of M. subnitida preferably visited the feeder closer to the nest during the scent mark trials, but choose randomly when tested for color learning. Worker honeybees preferred the closer feeding site if trained to yellow, but not if trained to blue, and preferred the more distant feeder during the scent mark trials. Workers of P. flavocincta preferred the closer feeder if trained to blue or yellow, and preferred the more distant feeder during the scent mark trials. The disparity among the species corresponds to differences in body size. Smaller bees are known for reduced visual capabilities and might rely less on visual parameters of the target such as color hue, saturation, or brightness but use scent cues instead. Moreover, the dim-light conditions in forest habitats might reduce the reliability of visual orientation as compared to olfactory orientation. Honeybees showed the most pronounced orientation at floral color cues. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7218124/ /pubmed/32435253 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00516 Text en Copyright © 2020 Koethe, Fischbach, Banysch, Reinartz, Hrncir and Lunau. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Koethe, Sebastian
Fischbach, Vivian
Banysch, Sarah
Reinartz, Lara
Hrncir, Michael
Lunau, Klaus
A Comparative Study of Food Source Selection in Stingless Bees and Honeybees: Scent Marks, Location, or Color
title A Comparative Study of Food Source Selection in Stingless Bees and Honeybees: Scent Marks, Location, or Color
title_full A Comparative Study of Food Source Selection in Stingless Bees and Honeybees: Scent Marks, Location, or Color
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Food Source Selection in Stingless Bees and Honeybees: Scent Marks, Location, or Color
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Food Source Selection in Stingless Bees and Honeybees: Scent Marks, Location, or Color
title_short A Comparative Study of Food Source Selection in Stingless Bees and Honeybees: Scent Marks, Location, or Color
title_sort comparative study of food source selection in stingless bees and honeybees: scent marks, location, or color
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7218124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435253
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00516
work_keys_str_mv AT koethesebastian acomparativestudyoffoodsourceselectioninstinglessbeesandhoneybeesscentmarkslocationorcolor
AT fischbachvivian acomparativestudyoffoodsourceselectioninstinglessbeesandhoneybeesscentmarkslocationorcolor
AT banyschsarah acomparativestudyoffoodsourceselectioninstinglessbeesandhoneybeesscentmarkslocationorcolor
AT reinartzlara acomparativestudyoffoodsourceselectioninstinglessbeesandhoneybeesscentmarkslocationorcolor
AT hrncirmichael acomparativestudyoffoodsourceselectioninstinglessbeesandhoneybeesscentmarkslocationorcolor
AT lunauklaus acomparativestudyoffoodsourceselectioninstinglessbeesandhoneybeesscentmarkslocationorcolor
AT koethesebastian comparativestudyoffoodsourceselectioninstinglessbeesandhoneybeesscentmarkslocationorcolor
AT fischbachvivian comparativestudyoffoodsourceselectioninstinglessbeesandhoneybeesscentmarkslocationorcolor
AT banyschsarah comparativestudyoffoodsourceselectioninstinglessbeesandhoneybeesscentmarkslocationorcolor
AT reinartzlara comparativestudyoffoodsourceselectioninstinglessbeesandhoneybeesscentmarkslocationorcolor
AT hrncirmichael comparativestudyoffoodsourceselectioninstinglessbeesandhoneybeesscentmarkslocationorcolor
AT lunauklaus comparativestudyoffoodsourceselectioninstinglessbeesandhoneybeesscentmarkslocationorcolor