Cargando…

Study Protocol of the ESAP Study: Endoscopic Papillectomy vs. Surgical Ampullectomy vs. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ampullary Neoplasm—A Pancreas2000/EPC Study

Background: Lesions of the Ampulla of Vater are a rare condition and represent <10% of peri-ampullary neoplasms. Nevertheless, ampullary adenomas have the potential for malignant transformation to ampullary carcinomas by an adenoma-to-carcinoma sequence. Thus, adequate patient selection and compl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hollenbach, Marcus, Ali, Einas Abou, Auriemma, Francesco, Gulla, Aiste, Heise, Christian, Regnér, Sara, Gaujoux, Sébastien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7218136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00152
_version_ 1783532735202066432
author Hollenbach, Marcus
Ali, Einas Abou
Auriemma, Francesco
Gulla, Aiste
Heise, Christian
Regnér, Sara
Gaujoux, Sébastien
author_facet Hollenbach, Marcus
Ali, Einas Abou
Auriemma, Francesco
Gulla, Aiste
Heise, Christian
Regnér, Sara
Gaujoux, Sébastien
author_sort Hollenbach, Marcus
collection PubMed
description Background: Lesions of the Ampulla of Vater are a rare condition and represent <10% of peri-ampullary neoplasms. Nevertheless, ampullary adenomas have the potential for malignant transformation to ampullary carcinomas by an adenoma-to-carcinoma sequence. Thus, adequate patient selection and complete resection (R0) of non-invasive ampullary lesions either by endoscopic papillectomy (EP), surgical ampullectomy (SA), or pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is essential. Although PD was traditionally performed, recent studies reported considerable efficacy and fewer complications following EP and SA. Since consistent comparative data are lacking, the Endoscopic Papillectomy vs. Surgical Ampullectomy vs. Pancreaticoduodectomy (ESAP) study will provide evidence for a therapeutic standard and post procedure morbidity in ampullary lesions. Methods: International multicenter retrospective study. Adult patients (>18 years of age) who underwent SA or PD for ampullary neoplasm between 2004 and 2018 or EP between 2007 and 2018 will be evaluated. Main inclusion criteria are ampullary lesions strictly located to the ampulla. This includes adenoma, adenocarcinoma (T(1) and T(2)), neuroendocrine tumors, gastrointestinal stroma tumors and other rare conditions. Exclusion criteria are peri-ampullary lesions, e.g., from the duodenal wall or the head of the pancreas, and interventions for tumor stages higher than T(2). The main objective of this study is to analyze rates of complete resection (R0), recurrence and necessity for complementary interventions following EP, SA, and PD. Treatment-quality for each procedure will be defined by morbidity, mortality and complication rates and will be compared between EP, SA, and PD. Secondary objectives include outcome for patients with incomplete resection or initially understated tumors, lesions of the minor papilla, hereditary syndromes, neuroendocrine tumors, mesenchymal lesions, and other rare conditions. Additionally, we will analyze therapy by argon plasma coagulation and radiofrequency ablation. Furthermore, outcome in curative and palliative interventions can be distinguished. Conclusion: The ESAP study will provide evidence for therapeutic algorithms and data for the implementation of guidelines in the treatment of different types of ampullary tumors, including recurrent, or incomplete resected lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7218136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72181362020-05-20 Study Protocol of the ESAP Study: Endoscopic Papillectomy vs. Surgical Ampullectomy vs. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ampullary Neoplasm—A Pancreas2000/EPC Study Hollenbach, Marcus Ali, Einas Abou Auriemma, Francesco Gulla, Aiste Heise, Christian Regnér, Sara Gaujoux, Sébastien Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: Lesions of the Ampulla of Vater are a rare condition and represent <10% of peri-ampullary neoplasms. Nevertheless, ampullary adenomas have the potential for malignant transformation to ampullary carcinomas by an adenoma-to-carcinoma sequence. Thus, adequate patient selection and complete resection (R0) of non-invasive ampullary lesions either by endoscopic papillectomy (EP), surgical ampullectomy (SA), or pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is essential. Although PD was traditionally performed, recent studies reported considerable efficacy and fewer complications following EP and SA. Since consistent comparative data are lacking, the Endoscopic Papillectomy vs. Surgical Ampullectomy vs. Pancreaticoduodectomy (ESAP) study will provide evidence for a therapeutic standard and post procedure morbidity in ampullary lesions. Methods: International multicenter retrospective study. Adult patients (>18 years of age) who underwent SA or PD for ampullary neoplasm between 2004 and 2018 or EP between 2007 and 2018 will be evaluated. Main inclusion criteria are ampullary lesions strictly located to the ampulla. This includes adenoma, adenocarcinoma (T(1) and T(2)), neuroendocrine tumors, gastrointestinal stroma tumors and other rare conditions. Exclusion criteria are peri-ampullary lesions, e.g., from the duodenal wall or the head of the pancreas, and interventions for tumor stages higher than T(2). The main objective of this study is to analyze rates of complete resection (R0), recurrence and necessity for complementary interventions following EP, SA, and PD. Treatment-quality for each procedure will be defined by morbidity, mortality and complication rates and will be compared between EP, SA, and PD. Secondary objectives include outcome for patients with incomplete resection or initially understated tumors, lesions of the minor papilla, hereditary syndromes, neuroendocrine tumors, mesenchymal lesions, and other rare conditions. Additionally, we will analyze therapy by argon plasma coagulation and radiofrequency ablation. Furthermore, outcome in curative and palliative interventions can be distinguished. Conclusion: The ESAP study will provide evidence for therapeutic algorithms and data for the implementation of guidelines in the treatment of different types of ampullary tumors, including recurrent, or incomplete resected lesions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7218136/ /pubmed/32435644 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00152 Text en Copyright © 2020 Hollenbach, Ali, Auriemma, Gulla, Heise, Regnér and Gaujoux. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Hollenbach, Marcus
Ali, Einas Abou
Auriemma, Francesco
Gulla, Aiste
Heise, Christian
Regnér, Sara
Gaujoux, Sébastien
Study Protocol of the ESAP Study: Endoscopic Papillectomy vs. Surgical Ampullectomy vs. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ampullary Neoplasm—A Pancreas2000/EPC Study
title Study Protocol of the ESAP Study: Endoscopic Papillectomy vs. Surgical Ampullectomy vs. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ampullary Neoplasm—A Pancreas2000/EPC Study
title_full Study Protocol of the ESAP Study: Endoscopic Papillectomy vs. Surgical Ampullectomy vs. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ampullary Neoplasm—A Pancreas2000/EPC Study
title_fullStr Study Protocol of the ESAP Study: Endoscopic Papillectomy vs. Surgical Ampullectomy vs. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ampullary Neoplasm—A Pancreas2000/EPC Study
title_full_unstemmed Study Protocol of the ESAP Study: Endoscopic Papillectomy vs. Surgical Ampullectomy vs. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ampullary Neoplasm—A Pancreas2000/EPC Study
title_short Study Protocol of the ESAP Study: Endoscopic Papillectomy vs. Surgical Ampullectomy vs. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ampullary Neoplasm—A Pancreas2000/EPC Study
title_sort study protocol of the esap study: endoscopic papillectomy vs. surgical ampullectomy vs. pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary neoplasm—a pancreas2000/epc study
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7218136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435644
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.00152
work_keys_str_mv AT hollenbachmarcus studyprotocoloftheesapstudyendoscopicpapillectomyvssurgicalampullectomyvspancreaticoduodenectomyforampullaryneoplasmapancreas2000epcstudy
AT alieinasabou studyprotocoloftheesapstudyendoscopicpapillectomyvssurgicalampullectomyvspancreaticoduodenectomyforampullaryneoplasmapancreas2000epcstudy
AT auriemmafrancesco studyprotocoloftheesapstudyendoscopicpapillectomyvssurgicalampullectomyvspancreaticoduodenectomyforampullaryneoplasmapancreas2000epcstudy
AT gullaaiste studyprotocoloftheesapstudyendoscopicpapillectomyvssurgicalampullectomyvspancreaticoduodenectomyforampullaryneoplasmapancreas2000epcstudy
AT heisechristian studyprotocoloftheesapstudyendoscopicpapillectomyvssurgicalampullectomyvspancreaticoduodenectomyforampullaryneoplasmapancreas2000epcstudy
AT regnersara studyprotocoloftheesapstudyendoscopicpapillectomyvssurgicalampullectomyvspancreaticoduodenectomyforampullaryneoplasmapancreas2000epcstudy
AT gaujouxsebastien studyprotocoloftheesapstudyendoscopicpapillectomyvssurgicalampullectomyvspancreaticoduodenectomyforampullaryneoplasmapancreas2000epcstudy