Cargando…

Magnetic Resonance Elastography reveals effects of anti-angiogenic glioblastoma treatment on tumor stiffness and captures progression in an orthotopic mouse model

BACKGROUND: Anti-angiogenic treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) complicates radiologic monitoring. We evaluated magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) as an imaging tool for monitoring the efficacy of anti-VEGF treatment of GBM. METHODS: Longitudinal studies were performed in an orthotopic GBM xenograft...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schregel, Katharina, Nowicki, Michal O., Palotai, Miklos, Nazari, Navid, Zane, Rachel, Sinkus, Ralph, Lawler, Sean E., Patz, Samuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7218549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32398076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00314-1
_version_ 1783532820850802688
author Schregel, Katharina
Nowicki, Michal O.
Palotai, Miklos
Nazari, Navid
Zane, Rachel
Sinkus, Ralph
Lawler, Sean E.
Patz, Samuel
author_facet Schregel, Katharina
Nowicki, Michal O.
Palotai, Miklos
Nazari, Navid
Zane, Rachel
Sinkus, Ralph
Lawler, Sean E.
Patz, Samuel
author_sort Schregel, Katharina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anti-angiogenic treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) complicates radiologic monitoring. We evaluated magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) as an imaging tool for monitoring the efficacy of anti-VEGF treatment of GBM. METHODS: Longitudinal studies were performed in an orthotopic GBM xenograft mouse model. Animals treated with B20 anti-VEGF antibody were compared to untreated controls regarding survival (n = 13), classical MRI-contrasts and biomechanics as quantified via MRE (n = 15). Imaging was performed on a 7 T small animal horizontal bore MRI scanner. MRI and MRE parameters were compared to histopathology. RESULTS: Anti-VEGF-treated animals survived longer than untreated controls (p = 0.0011) with progressively increased tumor volume in controls (p = 0.0001). MRE parameters viscoelasticity |G*| and phase angle Y significantly decreased in controls (p = 0.02 for |G*| and p = 0.0071 for Y). This indicates that untreated tumors became softer and more elastic than viscous with progression. Tumor volume in treated animals increased more slowly than in controls, indicating efficacy of the therapy, reaching significance only at the last time point (p = 0.02). Viscoelasticity and phase angle Y tended to decrease throughout therapy, similar as for control animals. However, in treated animals, the decrease in phase angle Y was significantly attenuated and reached statistical significance at the last time point (p = 0.04). Histopathologically, control tumors were larger and more heterogeneous than treated tumors. Vasculature was normalized in treated tumors compared with controls, which showed abnormal vasculature and necrosis. In treated tumors, a higher amount of myelin was observed within the tumor area (p = 0.03), likely due to increased tumor invasion. Stiffness of the contralateral hemisphere was influenced by tumor mass effect and edema. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-angiogenic GBM treatment prolonged animal survival, slowed tumor growth and softening, but did not prevent progression. MRE detected treatment effects on tumor stiffness; the decrease of viscoelasticity and phase angle in GBM was attenuated in treated animals, which might be explained by normalized vasculature and greater myelin preservation within treated tumors. Thus, further investigation of MRE is warranted to understand the potential for MRE in monitoring treatment in GBM patients by complementing existing MRI techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7218549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72185492020-05-18 Magnetic Resonance Elastography reveals effects of anti-angiogenic glioblastoma treatment on tumor stiffness and captures progression in an orthotopic mouse model Schregel, Katharina Nowicki, Michal O. Palotai, Miklos Nazari, Navid Zane, Rachel Sinkus, Ralph Lawler, Sean E. Patz, Samuel Cancer Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: Anti-angiogenic treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) complicates radiologic monitoring. We evaluated magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) as an imaging tool for monitoring the efficacy of anti-VEGF treatment of GBM. METHODS: Longitudinal studies were performed in an orthotopic GBM xenograft mouse model. Animals treated with B20 anti-VEGF antibody were compared to untreated controls regarding survival (n = 13), classical MRI-contrasts and biomechanics as quantified via MRE (n = 15). Imaging was performed on a 7 T small animal horizontal bore MRI scanner. MRI and MRE parameters were compared to histopathology. RESULTS: Anti-VEGF-treated animals survived longer than untreated controls (p = 0.0011) with progressively increased tumor volume in controls (p = 0.0001). MRE parameters viscoelasticity |G*| and phase angle Y significantly decreased in controls (p = 0.02 for |G*| and p = 0.0071 for Y). This indicates that untreated tumors became softer and more elastic than viscous with progression. Tumor volume in treated animals increased more slowly than in controls, indicating efficacy of the therapy, reaching significance only at the last time point (p = 0.02). Viscoelasticity and phase angle Y tended to decrease throughout therapy, similar as for control animals. However, in treated animals, the decrease in phase angle Y was significantly attenuated and reached statistical significance at the last time point (p = 0.04). Histopathologically, control tumors were larger and more heterogeneous than treated tumors. Vasculature was normalized in treated tumors compared with controls, which showed abnormal vasculature and necrosis. In treated tumors, a higher amount of myelin was observed within the tumor area (p = 0.03), likely due to increased tumor invasion. Stiffness of the contralateral hemisphere was influenced by tumor mass effect and edema. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-angiogenic GBM treatment prolonged animal survival, slowed tumor growth and softening, but did not prevent progression. MRE detected treatment effects on tumor stiffness; the decrease of viscoelasticity and phase angle in GBM was attenuated in treated animals, which might be explained by normalized vasculature and greater myelin preservation within treated tumors. Thus, further investigation of MRE is warranted to understand the potential for MRE in monitoring treatment in GBM patients by complementing existing MRI techniques. BioMed Central 2020-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7218549/ /pubmed/32398076 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00314-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schregel, Katharina
Nowicki, Michal O.
Palotai, Miklos
Nazari, Navid
Zane, Rachel
Sinkus, Ralph
Lawler, Sean E.
Patz, Samuel
Magnetic Resonance Elastography reveals effects of anti-angiogenic glioblastoma treatment on tumor stiffness and captures progression in an orthotopic mouse model
title Magnetic Resonance Elastography reveals effects of anti-angiogenic glioblastoma treatment on tumor stiffness and captures progression in an orthotopic mouse model
title_full Magnetic Resonance Elastography reveals effects of anti-angiogenic glioblastoma treatment on tumor stiffness and captures progression in an orthotopic mouse model
title_fullStr Magnetic Resonance Elastography reveals effects of anti-angiogenic glioblastoma treatment on tumor stiffness and captures progression in an orthotopic mouse model
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic Resonance Elastography reveals effects of anti-angiogenic glioblastoma treatment on tumor stiffness and captures progression in an orthotopic mouse model
title_short Magnetic Resonance Elastography reveals effects of anti-angiogenic glioblastoma treatment on tumor stiffness and captures progression in an orthotopic mouse model
title_sort magnetic resonance elastography reveals effects of anti-angiogenic glioblastoma treatment on tumor stiffness and captures progression in an orthotopic mouse model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7218549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32398076
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00314-1
work_keys_str_mv AT schregelkatharina magneticresonanceelastographyrevealseffectsofantiangiogenicglioblastomatreatmentontumorstiffnessandcapturesprogressioninanorthotopicmousemodel
AT nowickimichalo magneticresonanceelastographyrevealseffectsofantiangiogenicglioblastomatreatmentontumorstiffnessandcapturesprogressioninanorthotopicmousemodel
AT palotaimiklos magneticresonanceelastographyrevealseffectsofantiangiogenicglioblastomatreatmentontumorstiffnessandcapturesprogressioninanorthotopicmousemodel
AT nazarinavid magneticresonanceelastographyrevealseffectsofantiangiogenicglioblastomatreatmentontumorstiffnessandcapturesprogressioninanorthotopicmousemodel
AT zanerachel magneticresonanceelastographyrevealseffectsofantiangiogenicglioblastomatreatmentontumorstiffnessandcapturesprogressioninanorthotopicmousemodel
AT sinkusralph magneticresonanceelastographyrevealseffectsofantiangiogenicglioblastomatreatmentontumorstiffnessandcapturesprogressioninanorthotopicmousemodel
AT lawlerseane magneticresonanceelastographyrevealseffectsofantiangiogenicglioblastomatreatmentontumorstiffnessandcapturesprogressioninanorthotopicmousemodel
AT patzsamuel magneticresonanceelastographyrevealseffectsofantiangiogenicglioblastomatreatmentontumorstiffnessandcapturesprogressioninanorthotopicmousemodel