Cargando…
No carbon limitation after lower crown loss in Pinus radiata
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Biotic and abiotic stressors can cause different defoliation patterns within trees. Foliar pathogens of conifers commonly prefer older needles and infection with defoliation that progresses from the bottom crown to the top. The functional role of the lower crown of trees is a ke...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7218809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31990290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaa013 |
_version_ | 1783532867794501632 |
---|---|
author | Gomez-Gallego, Mireia Williams, Nari Leuzinger, Sebastian Scott, Peter Matthew Bader, Martin Karl-Friedrich |
author_facet | Gomez-Gallego, Mireia Williams, Nari Leuzinger, Sebastian Scott, Peter Matthew Bader, Martin Karl-Friedrich |
author_sort | Gomez-Gallego, Mireia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Biotic and abiotic stressors can cause different defoliation patterns within trees. Foliar pathogens of conifers commonly prefer older needles and infection with defoliation that progresses from the bottom crown to the top. The functional role of the lower crown of trees is a key question to address the impact of defoliation caused by foliar pathogens. METHODS: A 2 year artificial defoliation experiment was performed using two genotypes of grafted Pinus radiata to investigate the effects of lower-crown defoliation on carbon (C) assimilation and allocation. Grafts received one of the following treatments in consecutive years: control–control, control–defoliated, defoliated–control and defoliated–defoliated. RESULTS: No upregulation of photosynthesis either biochemically or through stomatal control was observed in response to defoliation. The root:shoot ratio and leaf mass were not affected by any treatment, suggesting prioritization of crown regrowth following defoliation. In genotype B, defoliation appeared to impose C shortage and caused reduced above-ground growth and sugar storage in roots, while in genotype A, neither growth nor storage was altered. Root C storage in genotype B decreased only transiently and recovered over the second growing season. CONCLUSIONS: In genotype A, the contribution of the lower crown to the whole-tree C uptake appears to be negligible, presumably conferring resilience to foliar pathogens affecting the lower crown. Our results suggest that there is no C limitation after lower-crown defoliation in P. radiata grafts. Further, our findings imply genotype-specific defoliation tolerance in P. radiata. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7218809 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72188092020-07-13 No carbon limitation after lower crown loss in Pinus radiata Gomez-Gallego, Mireia Williams, Nari Leuzinger, Sebastian Scott, Peter Matthew Bader, Martin Karl-Friedrich Ann Bot Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Biotic and abiotic stressors can cause different defoliation patterns within trees. Foliar pathogens of conifers commonly prefer older needles and infection with defoliation that progresses from the bottom crown to the top. The functional role of the lower crown of trees is a key question to address the impact of defoliation caused by foliar pathogens. METHODS: A 2 year artificial defoliation experiment was performed using two genotypes of grafted Pinus radiata to investigate the effects of lower-crown defoliation on carbon (C) assimilation and allocation. Grafts received one of the following treatments in consecutive years: control–control, control–defoliated, defoliated–control and defoliated–defoliated. RESULTS: No upregulation of photosynthesis either biochemically or through stomatal control was observed in response to defoliation. The root:shoot ratio and leaf mass were not affected by any treatment, suggesting prioritization of crown regrowth following defoliation. In genotype B, defoliation appeared to impose C shortage and caused reduced above-ground growth and sugar storage in roots, while in genotype A, neither growth nor storage was altered. Root C storage in genotype B decreased only transiently and recovered over the second growing season. CONCLUSIONS: In genotype A, the contribution of the lower crown to the whole-tree C uptake appears to be negligible, presumably conferring resilience to foliar pathogens affecting the lower crown. Our results suggest that there is no C limitation after lower-crown defoliation in P. radiata grafts. Further, our findings imply genotype-specific defoliation tolerance in P. radiata. Oxford University Press 2020-05 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7218809/ /pubmed/31990290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaa013 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Gomez-Gallego, Mireia Williams, Nari Leuzinger, Sebastian Scott, Peter Matthew Bader, Martin Karl-Friedrich No carbon limitation after lower crown loss in Pinus radiata |
title | No carbon limitation after lower crown loss in Pinus radiata |
title_full | No carbon limitation after lower crown loss in Pinus radiata |
title_fullStr | No carbon limitation after lower crown loss in Pinus radiata |
title_full_unstemmed | No carbon limitation after lower crown loss in Pinus radiata |
title_short | No carbon limitation after lower crown loss in Pinus radiata |
title_sort | no carbon limitation after lower crown loss in pinus radiata |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7218809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31990290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaa013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gomezgallegomireia nocarbonlimitationafterlowercrownlossinpinusradiata AT williamsnari nocarbonlimitationafterlowercrownlossinpinusradiata AT leuzingersebastian nocarbonlimitationafterlowercrownlossinpinusradiata AT scottpetermatthew nocarbonlimitationafterlowercrownlossinpinusradiata AT badermartinkarlfriedrich nocarbonlimitationafterlowercrownlossinpinusradiata |