Cargando…

From campus to communities: evaluation of the first UK-based bystander programme for the prevention of domestic violence and abuse in general communities

BACKGROUND: Violence against women and girls is a public health epidemic. Campus-based research has found bystander programmes show promise as effective primary prevention of sexual violence. However, evidence regarding domestic violence and abuse bystander prevention specifically, and in community...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gainsbury, Alexa N., Fenton, Rachel A., Jones, Cassandra A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7218832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32404079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08519-6
_version_ 1783532871298842624
author Gainsbury, Alexa N.
Fenton, Rachel A.
Jones, Cassandra A.
author_facet Gainsbury, Alexa N.
Fenton, Rachel A.
Jones, Cassandra A.
author_sort Gainsbury, Alexa N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Violence against women and girls is a public health epidemic. Campus-based research has found bystander programmes show promise as effective primary prevention of sexual violence. However, evidence regarding domestic violence and abuse bystander prevention specifically, and in community settings generally, is still in development. Further, research has predominantly emanated from the US. Examining proof of concept in differing cultural contexts is required. This study evaluates the feasibility and potential for effectiveness of a domestic violence and abuse bystander intervention within UK general communities—Active Bystander Communities. METHODS: Participants recruited opportunistically attended a three-session programme facilitated by experts in the field. Programme feasibility was measured using participant attendance and feedback across nine learning objectives. Myth acceptance, bystander efficacy, behavioural intent and bystander behaviours were assessed using validated scales at baseline, post-intervention, and four-month follow-up. Results were examined for potential backlash. Analyses used a paired sample t-test and effect size was quantified with Cohen’s d. RESULTS: 58/70 participants attended all programme sessions. Participant feedback consistently rated the programme highly and significant change (p ≤ 0·001) was observed in the desired direction across behavioural intent, bystander efficacy, and myth acceptance scores at post and follow-up. Effect size was generally large and, with the exception of Perception of Peer Myth Acceptance, improved at follow-up. Backlash was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first UK-based study to examine the potential of bystander intervention as a community-level intervention for domestic violence and abuse. Findings are promising and indicate the translatability of the bystander approach to domestic violence and abuse prevention as well as community contexts. This is likely to be of great interest to policymakers and may help shape future community-based interventions. Further research is now needed using experimental designs engaging diverse community audiences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7218832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72188322020-05-20 From campus to communities: evaluation of the first UK-based bystander programme for the prevention of domestic violence and abuse in general communities Gainsbury, Alexa N. Fenton, Rachel A. Jones, Cassandra A. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Violence against women and girls is a public health epidemic. Campus-based research has found bystander programmes show promise as effective primary prevention of sexual violence. However, evidence regarding domestic violence and abuse bystander prevention specifically, and in community settings generally, is still in development. Further, research has predominantly emanated from the US. Examining proof of concept in differing cultural contexts is required. This study evaluates the feasibility and potential for effectiveness of a domestic violence and abuse bystander intervention within UK general communities—Active Bystander Communities. METHODS: Participants recruited opportunistically attended a three-session programme facilitated by experts in the field. Programme feasibility was measured using participant attendance and feedback across nine learning objectives. Myth acceptance, bystander efficacy, behavioural intent and bystander behaviours were assessed using validated scales at baseline, post-intervention, and four-month follow-up. Results were examined for potential backlash. Analyses used a paired sample t-test and effect size was quantified with Cohen’s d. RESULTS: 58/70 participants attended all programme sessions. Participant feedback consistently rated the programme highly and significant change (p ≤ 0·001) was observed in the desired direction across behavioural intent, bystander efficacy, and myth acceptance scores at post and follow-up. Effect size was generally large and, with the exception of Perception of Peer Myth Acceptance, improved at follow-up. Backlash was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first UK-based study to examine the potential of bystander intervention as a community-level intervention for domestic violence and abuse. Findings are promising and indicate the translatability of the bystander approach to domestic violence and abuse prevention as well as community contexts. This is likely to be of great interest to policymakers and may help shape future community-based interventions. Further research is now needed using experimental designs engaging diverse community audiences. BioMed Central 2020-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7218832/ /pubmed/32404079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08519-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gainsbury, Alexa N.
Fenton, Rachel A.
Jones, Cassandra A.
From campus to communities: evaluation of the first UK-based bystander programme for the prevention of domestic violence and abuse in general communities
title From campus to communities: evaluation of the first UK-based bystander programme for the prevention of domestic violence and abuse in general communities
title_full From campus to communities: evaluation of the first UK-based bystander programme for the prevention of domestic violence and abuse in general communities
title_fullStr From campus to communities: evaluation of the first UK-based bystander programme for the prevention of domestic violence and abuse in general communities
title_full_unstemmed From campus to communities: evaluation of the first UK-based bystander programme for the prevention of domestic violence and abuse in general communities
title_short From campus to communities: evaluation of the first UK-based bystander programme for the prevention of domestic violence and abuse in general communities
title_sort from campus to communities: evaluation of the first uk-based bystander programme for the prevention of domestic violence and abuse in general communities
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7218832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32404079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08519-6
work_keys_str_mv AT gainsburyalexan fromcampustocommunitiesevaluationofthefirstukbasedbystanderprogrammeforthepreventionofdomesticviolenceandabuseingeneralcommunities
AT fentonrachela fromcampustocommunitiesevaluationofthefirstukbasedbystanderprogrammeforthepreventionofdomesticviolenceandabuseingeneralcommunities
AT jonescassandraa fromcampustocommunitiesevaluationofthefirstukbasedbystanderprogrammeforthepreventionofdomesticviolenceandabuseingeneralcommunities