Cargando…
The effect of hyoscine n- butylbromide on labor progress: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of hyoscine n-butylbromide in labor progress. METHODS: The databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Science-Direct, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for studies published up to Decem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7218842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32404072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2832-3 |
_version_ | 1783532873680158720 |
---|---|
author | Mohaghegh, Zaynab Abedi, Parvin Faal, Shahla Jahanfar, Shayesteh Surdock, Alayna Sharifipour, Foruzan Zahedian, Maryam |
author_facet | Mohaghegh, Zaynab Abedi, Parvin Faal, Shahla Jahanfar, Shayesteh Surdock, Alayna Sharifipour, Foruzan Zahedian, Maryam |
author_sort | Mohaghegh, Zaynab |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of hyoscine n-butylbromide in labor progress. METHODS: The databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Science-Direct, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for studies published up to December 2019. Articles that published as randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and full-text articles published in English or other languages were included and participants were primi or multigravida women who were in active phase of labor. The intervention included HBB compared to placebo (normal saline) that was used during active phase of labor. Pooled estimates were measured using the fixed or random effect model, while the overall effect was reported in a mean difference (MD). All data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: Twenty studies involving 3108 women were included in meta-analysis. Based on subgroup analysis by parity, use of HBB significantly reduced the duration of the first stage of labor in primigravida women (MD = − 57.73; 95% CI: [− 61.48, − 53.60]) and in multigravida women (MD = − 90.74; 95% CI: [− 97.24, − 84.24]). Administering HBB could reduce the second stages of labor in primigravidas and multigravidas about 6 min and 4 min respectively. Also, HBB reduced the duration of the third stage of labor in multigravidas about 3 min. APGAR score at one and 5 min after birth was not affected. The main maternal adverse effect was tachycardia and dry mouth. Labor duration in studies in which the participants were primi-and multigravida was not presented based on separate parities except for four papers, and the route of HBB administration was not the same across all studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although, the effect of HBB was minimal when multigravidas and primigravidas women were considered together, the HBB was clinically effective in primigravida and multigravida women for shortening the first and the second stages of labor. Also, HBB could reduce the length of the third stage of labor in multigravidas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7218842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72188422020-05-20 The effect of hyoscine n- butylbromide on labor progress: A systematic review Mohaghegh, Zaynab Abedi, Parvin Faal, Shahla Jahanfar, Shayesteh Surdock, Alayna Sharifipour, Foruzan Zahedian, Maryam BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of hyoscine n-butylbromide in labor progress. METHODS: The databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Science-Direct, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for studies published up to December 2019. Articles that published as randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and full-text articles published in English or other languages were included and participants were primi or multigravida women who were in active phase of labor. The intervention included HBB compared to placebo (normal saline) that was used during active phase of labor. Pooled estimates were measured using the fixed or random effect model, while the overall effect was reported in a mean difference (MD). All data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: Twenty studies involving 3108 women were included in meta-analysis. Based on subgroup analysis by parity, use of HBB significantly reduced the duration of the first stage of labor in primigravida women (MD = − 57.73; 95% CI: [− 61.48, − 53.60]) and in multigravida women (MD = − 90.74; 95% CI: [− 97.24, − 84.24]). Administering HBB could reduce the second stages of labor in primigravidas and multigravidas about 6 min and 4 min respectively. Also, HBB reduced the duration of the third stage of labor in multigravidas about 3 min. APGAR score at one and 5 min after birth was not affected. The main maternal adverse effect was tachycardia and dry mouth. Labor duration in studies in which the participants were primi-and multigravida was not presented based on separate parities except for four papers, and the route of HBB administration was not the same across all studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although, the effect of HBB was minimal when multigravidas and primigravidas women were considered together, the HBB was clinically effective in primigravida and multigravida women for shortening the first and the second stages of labor. Also, HBB could reduce the length of the third stage of labor in multigravidas. BioMed Central 2020-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7218842/ /pubmed/32404072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2832-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mohaghegh, Zaynab Abedi, Parvin Faal, Shahla Jahanfar, Shayesteh Surdock, Alayna Sharifipour, Foruzan Zahedian, Maryam The effect of hyoscine n- butylbromide on labor progress: A systematic review |
title | The effect of hyoscine n- butylbromide on labor progress: A systematic review |
title_full | The effect of hyoscine n- butylbromide on labor progress: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | The effect of hyoscine n- butylbromide on labor progress: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of hyoscine n- butylbromide on labor progress: A systematic review |
title_short | The effect of hyoscine n- butylbromide on labor progress: A systematic review |
title_sort | effect of hyoscine n- butylbromide on labor progress: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7218842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32404072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2832-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohagheghzaynab theeffectofhyoscinenbutylbromideonlaborprogressasystematicreview AT abediparvin theeffectofhyoscinenbutylbromideonlaborprogressasystematicreview AT faalshahla theeffectofhyoscinenbutylbromideonlaborprogressasystematicreview AT jahanfarshayesteh theeffectofhyoscinenbutylbromideonlaborprogressasystematicreview AT surdockalayna theeffectofhyoscinenbutylbromideonlaborprogressasystematicreview AT sharifipourforuzan theeffectofhyoscinenbutylbromideonlaborprogressasystematicreview AT zahedianmaryam theeffectofhyoscinenbutylbromideonlaborprogressasystematicreview AT mohagheghzaynab effectofhyoscinenbutylbromideonlaborprogressasystematicreview AT abediparvin effectofhyoscinenbutylbromideonlaborprogressasystematicreview AT faalshahla effectofhyoscinenbutylbromideonlaborprogressasystematicreview AT jahanfarshayesteh effectofhyoscinenbutylbromideonlaborprogressasystematicreview AT surdockalayna effectofhyoscinenbutylbromideonlaborprogressasystematicreview AT sharifipourforuzan effectofhyoscinenbutylbromideonlaborprogressasystematicreview AT zahedianmaryam effectofhyoscinenbutylbromideonlaborprogressasystematicreview |