Cargando…

Evaluating the utility of time-lapse imaging in the estimation of post-mortem interval: An Australian case study

Estimating post-mortem interval is an important aspect in forensic investigations. The aim of this study was to investigate if time-lapse imaging can be used to improve estimates of post-mortem interval using Megyesi et al.‘s [1] method for a human donor decomposing in an Australian environment. To...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Alyson, Serafin, Stanley, Seckiner, Dilan, Berry, Rachel, Mallett, Xanthé
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32411972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.08.003
_version_ 1783532941808238592
author Wilson, Alyson
Serafin, Stanley
Seckiner, Dilan
Berry, Rachel
Mallett, Xanthé
author_facet Wilson, Alyson
Serafin, Stanley
Seckiner, Dilan
Berry, Rachel
Mallett, Xanthé
author_sort Wilson, Alyson
collection PubMed
description Estimating post-mortem interval is an important aspect in forensic investigations. The aim of this study was to investigate if time-lapse imaging can be used to improve estimates of post-mortem interval using Megyesi et al.‘s [1] method for a human donor decomposing in an Australian environment. To achieve this, time-lapse images were taken every 30 min over a 6-month period. The Megyesi et al. [1] total body score (TBS) system was used to quantify the level of decomposition of the donor for each image. Linear regression was performed to determine if observing decomposition more than once a day leads to increased accuracy in predicting PMI (post-mortem interval). Decomposition initially progressed quickly and then plateaued at 1004 hours PMI, with a TBS of 24. Individual timestamps were created from the time-lapse images taken each day at 08:00 hrs, 11:00 hrs, 14:00 hrs, 15:00 hrs, and 17:00 hrs. All timestamps produced R(2) values > 0.80, indicating that the Megyesi et al. [1] method accurately predicts PMI for this donor. The 08:00 hrs timestamp had the highest value R(2) = 0.886, whilst the combined timestamp (which included the scores from all five images for each 24-hour period) R(2) = 0.823 was the lowest. This study supports the validity of Megyesi et al.‘s [1] TBS model to estimate PMI. Two other interesting findings were that the results suggest that scoring TBS multiple times per day does not improve estimates of PMI, however scoring TBS at daybreak produces more accurate results than scoring TBS later in the day. This may be an important consideration in forensic scenarios.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7219161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72191612020-05-14 Evaluating the utility of time-lapse imaging in the estimation of post-mortem interval: An Australian case study Wilson, Alyson Serafin, Stanley Seckiner, Dilan Berry, Rachel Mallett, Xanthé Forensic Sci Int Synerg Interdisciplinary Forensics Estimating post-mortem interval is an important aspect in forensic investigations. The aim of this study was to investigate if time-lapse imaging can be used to improve estimates of post-mortem interval using Megyesi et al.‘s [1] method for a human donor decomposing in an Australian environment. To achieve this, time-lapse images were taken every 30 min over a 6-month period. The Megyesi et al. [1] total body score (TBS) system was used to quantify the level of decomposition of the donor for each image. Linear regression was performed to determine if observing decomposition more than once a day leads to increased accuracy in predicting PMI (post-mortem interval). Decomposition initially progressed quickly and then plateaued at 1004 hours PMI, with a TBS of 24. Individual timestamps were created from the time-lapse images taken each day at 08:00 hrs, 11:00 hrs, 14:00 hrs, 15:00 hrs, and 17:00 hrs. All timestamps produced R(2) values > 0.80, indicating that the Megyesi et al. [1] method accurately predicts PMI for this donor. The 08:00 hrs timestamp had the highest value R(2) = 0.886, whilst the combined timestamp (which included the scores from all five images for each 24-hour period) R(2) = 0.823 was the lowest. This study supports the validity of Megyesi et al.‘s [1] TBS model to estimate PMI. Two other interesting findings were that the results suggest that scoring TBS multiple times per day does not improve estimates of PMI, however scoring TBS at daybreak produces more accurate results than scoring TBS later in the day. This may be an important consideration in forensic scenarios. Elsevier 2019-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7219161/ /pubmed/32411972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.08.003 Text en © 2019 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Interdisciplinary Forensics
Wilson, Alyson
Serafin, Stanley
Seckiner, Dilan
Berry, Rachel
Mallett, Xanthé
Evaluating the utility of time-lapse imaging in the estimation of post-mortem interval: An Australian case study
title Evaluating the utility of time-lapse imaging in the estimation of post-mortem interval: An Australian case study
title_full Evaluating the utility of time-lapse imaging in the estimation of post-mortem interval: An Australian case study
title_fullStr Evaluating the utility of time-lapse imaging in the estimation of post-mortem interval: An Australian case study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the utility of time-lapse imaging in the estimation of post-mortem interval: An Australian case study
title_short Evaluating the utility of time-lapse imaging in the estimation of post-mortem interval: An Australian case study
title_sort evaluating the utility of time-lapse imaging in the estimation of post-mortem interval: an australian case study
topic Interdisciplinary Forensics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32411972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.08.003
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonalyson evaluatingtheutilityoftimelapseimagingintheestimationofpostmortemintervalanaustraliancasestudy
AT serafinstanley evaluatingtheutilityoftimelapseimagingintheestimationofpostmortemintervalanaustraliancasestudy
AT seckinerdilan evaluatingtheutilityoftimelapseimagingintheestimationofpostmortemintervalanaustraliancasestudy
AT berryrachel evaluatingtheutilityoftimelapseimagingintheestimationofpostmortemintervalanaustraliancasestudy
AT mallettxanthe evaluatingtheutilityoftimelapseimagingintheestimationofpostmortemintervalanaustraliancasestudy