Cargando…
Juror comprehension of forensic expert testimony: A literature review and gap analysis
Forensic scientists and commentators including academics and statisticians have been embroiled in a debate over the best way to present evidence in the courtroom. Various forms of evidence presentation, both quantitative and qualitative, have been championed, yet amidst the furor over the most “corr...
Autor principal: | Eldridge, Heidi |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32411951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.03.001 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reimagining forensic science – The mission of the forensic laboratory
por: Wickenheiser, Ray A.
Publicado: (2021) -
Forensic intelligence: Data analytics as the bridge between forensic science and investigation
por: Delgado, Yaneisy, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Forensic science in Seychelles: An example of a micro-jurisdiction forensic delivery system
por: Bouzin, Jemmy T., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Asymmetric politics and forensic intelligence()
por: Houck, Max M.
Publicado: (2019) -
The development of forensic science standards in China
por: Zhai, Wanfeng, et al.
Publicado: (2020)