Cargando…
Tigers, black swans, and unicorns: The need for feedback and oversight
Humans have a decision-making system which is biased to avoid costly false negatives while the criminal justice system is designed to be biased in the opposite way, avoiding costly false positives. But systems fail, people do not; a badly out of kilter system can lead even the most expert to bad out...
Autor principal: | Houck, Max M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32411958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.04.002 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Standard model: The elephant, the tiger, the penguin and the unicorn
Publicado: (1995) -
What is open-access publishing and what it means for the forensic enterprise
por: Houck, M.M., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Forensic science needs registered reports()
por: Chin, Jason M., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The black swan
por: Lybeck, Eric
Publicado: (2017) -
An inconvenient truth: More rigorous and ecologically valid research is needed to properly understand cognitive bias in forensic decisions
por: Curley, Lee J., et al.
Publicado: (2020)