Cargando…
Must the random man be unrelated? A lingering misconception in forensic genetics
A nearly universal practice among forensic DNA scientists includes mentioning an unrelated person as the possible alternative source of a DNA stain, when one in fact refers to an unknown person. Hence, experts typically express their conclusions with statements like: “The probability of the DNA evid...
Autores principales: | Milot, Emmanuel, Baechler, Simon, Crispino, Frank |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32411996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.11.003 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Human factors in forensic science: The cognitive mechanisms that underlie forensic feature-comparison expertise
por: Growns, Bethany, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Forensic epistemology: A need for research and pedagogy
por: Illes, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science
por: Dror, Itiel E., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Cemetery hoodoo: Culture, ritual crime and forensic archaeology
por: Moses, Sharon K.
Publicado: (2019) -
Forensic genealogy, bioethics and the Golden State Killer case
por: Wickenheiser, Ray A.
Publicado: (2019)