Cargando…
A comparison of femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3D-CT study
BACKGROUND: Graft malposition is a risk factor for failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A 70° arthroscope improves visualisation of the medial wall of the lateral femoral condyle without switching portals. We investigated whether the use of this arthroscope affected the accuracy and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-020-00037-4 |
_version_ | 1783532950526099456 |
---|---|
author | Kosy, Jonathan D. Walmsley, Katie Sharma, Akash D. Gordon, Elizabeth A. Heddon, Sadie V. Anaspure, Rahul Schranz, Peter J. Mandalia, Vipul I. |
author_facet | Kosy, Jonathan D. Walmsley, Katie Sharma, Akash D. Gordon, Elizabeth A. Heddon, Sadie V. Anaspure, Rahul Schranz, Peter J. Mandalia, Vipul I. |
author_sort | Kosy, Jonathan D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Graft malposition is a risk factor for failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A 70° arthroscope improves visualisation of the medial wall of the lateral femoral condyle without switching portals. We investigated whether the use of this arthroscope affected the accuracy and precision of femoral tunnel placement. METHODS: Fifty consecutive adult patients were recruited. Following one withdrawal and two exclusions, 47 patients (30 in group 1 (70° arthroscope), 17 in group 2 (30° arthroscope)) underwent three-dimensional computed tomography imaging using a grid-based system to measure tunnel position. RESULTS: No difference was found in the accuracy or precision of tunnels (mean position: group 1 = 33.3 ± 6.0% deep–shallow, 27.2 ± 5.2% high–low; group 2 = 31.7 ± 6.9% deep–shallow, 29.0 ± 6.2% high–low; not significant). A post-hoc power analysis suggests a study of 106 patients would be required. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that tunnel position is not affected by the arthroscope used. An appropriately powered study could investigate this finding alongside other potential benefits of using a 70° arthroscope for this procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02816606. Registered on 28 June 2016. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7219201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72192012020-05-14 A comparison of femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3D-CT study Kosy, Jonathan D. Walmsley, Katie Sharma, Akash D. Gordon, Elizabeth A. Heddon, Sadie V. Anaspure, Rahul Schranz, Peter J. Mandalia, Vipul I. Knee Surg Relat Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Graft malposition is a risk factor for failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A 70° arthroscope improves visualisation of the medial wall of the lateral femoral condyle without switching portals. We investigated whether the use of this arthroscope affected the accuracy and precision of femoral tunnel placement. METHODS: Fifty consecutive adult patients were recruited. Following one withdrawal and two exclusions, 47 patients (30 in group 1 (70° arthroscope), 17 in group 2 (30° arthroscope)) underwent three-dimensional computed tomography imaging using a grid-based system to measure tunnel position. RESULTS: No difference was found in the accuracy or precision of tunnels (mean position: group 1 = 33.3 ± 6.0% deep–shallow, 27.2 ± 5.2% high–low; group 2 = 31.7 ± 6.9% deep–shallow, 29.0 ± 6.2% high–low; not significant). A post-hoc power analysis suggests a study of 106 patients would be required. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that tunnel position is not affected by the arthroscope used. An appropriately powered study could investigate this finding alongside other potential benefits of using a 70° arthroscope for this procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02816606. Registered on 28 June 2016. BioMed Central 2020-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7219201/ /pubmed/32660634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-020-00037-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kosy, Jonathan D. Walmsley, Katie Sharma, Akash D. Gordon, Elizabeth A. Heddon, Sadie V. Anaspure, Rahul Schranz, Peter J. Mandalia, Vipul I. A comparison of femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3D-CT study |
title | A comparison of femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3D-CT study |
title_full | A comparison of femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3D-CT study |
title_fullStr | A comparison of femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3D-CT study |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3D-CT study |
title_short | A comparison of femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3D-CT study |
title_sort | comparison of femoral tunnel placement in acl reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3d-ct study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-020-00037-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kosyjonathand acomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy AT walmsleykatie acomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy AT sharmaakashd acomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy AT gordonelizabetha acomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy AT heddonsadiev acomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy AT anaspurerahul acomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy AT schranzpeterj acomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy AT mandaliavipuli acomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy AT kosyjonathand comparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy AT walmsleykatie comparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy AT sharmaakashd comparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy AT gordonelizabetha comparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy AT heddonsadiev comparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy AT anaspurerahul comparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy AT schranzpeterj comparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy AT mandaliavipuli comparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy |