Cargando…

A comparison of femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3D-CT study

BACKGROUND: Graft malposition is a risk factor for failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A 70° arthroscope improves visualisation of the medial wall of the lateral femoral condyle without switching portals. We investigated whether the use of this arthroscope affected the accuracy and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kosy, Jonathan D., Walmsley, Katie, Sharma, Akash D., Gordon, Elizabeth A., Heddon, Sadie V., Anaspure, Rahul, Schranz, Peter J., Mandalia, Vipul I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-020-00037-4
_version_ 1783532950526099456
author Kosy, Jonathan D.
Walmsley, Katie
Sharma, Akash D.
Gordon, Elizabeth A.
Heddon, Sadie V.
Anaspure, Rahul
Schranz, Peter J.
Mandalia, Vipul I.
author_facet Kosy, Jonathan D.
Walmsley, Katie
Sharma, Akash D.
Gordon, Elizabeth A.
Heddon, Sadie V.
Anaspure, Rahul
Schranz, Peter J.
Mandalia, Vipul I.
author_sort Kosy, Jonathan D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Graft malposition is a risk factor for failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A 70° arthroscope improves visualisation of the medial wall of the lateral femoral condyle without switching portals. We investigated whether the use of this arthroscope affected the accuracy and precision of femoral tunnel placement. METHODS: Fifty consecutive adult patients were recruited. Following one withdrawal and two exclusions, 47 patients (30 in group 1 (70° arthroscope), 17 in group 2 (30° arthroscope)) underwent three-dimensional computed tomography imaging using a grid-based system to measure tunnel position. RESULTS: No difference was found in the accuracy or precision of tunnels (mean position: group 1 = 33.3 ± 6.0% deep–shallow, 27.2 ± 5.2% high–low; group 2 = 31.7 ± 6.9% deep–shallow, 29.0 ± 6.2% high–low; not significant). A post-hoc power analysis suggests a study of 106 patients would be required. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that tunnel position is not affected by the arthroscope used. An appropriately powered study could investigate this finding alongside other potential benefits of using a 70° arthroscope for this procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02816606. Registered on 28 June 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7219201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72192012020-05-14 A comparison of femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3D-CT study Kosy, Jonathan D. Walmsley, Katie Sharma, Akash D. Gordon, Elizabeth A. Heddon, Sadie V. Anaspure, Rahul Schranz, Peter J. Mandalia, Vipul I. Knee Surg Relat Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Graft malposition is a risk factor for failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A 70° arthroscope improves visualisation of the medial wall of the lateral femoral condyle without switching portals. We investigated whether the use of this arthroscope affected the accuracy and precision of femoral tunnel placement. METHODS: Fifty consecutive adult patients were recruited. Following one withdrawal and two exclusions, 47 patients (30 in group 1 (70° arthroscope), 17 in group 2 (30° arthroscope)) underwent three-dimensional computed tomography imaging using a grid-based system to measure tunnel position. RESULTS: No difference was found in the accuracy or precision of tunnels (mean position: group 1 = 33.3 ± 6.0% deep–shallow, 27.2 ± 5.2% high–low; group 2 = 31.7 ± 6.9% deep–shallow, 29.0 ± 6.2% high–low; not significant). A post-hoc power analysis suggests a study of 106 patients would be required. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that tunnel position is not affected by the arthroscope used. An appropriately powered study could investigate this finding alongside other potential benefits of using a 70° arthroscope for this procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02816606. Registered on 28 June 2016. BioMed Central 2020-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7219201/ /pubmed/32660634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-020-00037-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kosy, Jonathan D.
Walmsley, Katie
Sharma, Akash D.
Gordon, Elizabeth A.
Heddon, Sadie V.
Anaspure, Rahul
Schranz, Peter J.
Mandalia, Vipul I.
A comparison of femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3D-CT study
title A comparison of femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3D-CT study
title_full A comparison of femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3D-CT study
title_fullStr A comparison of femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3D-CT study
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3D-CT study
title_short A comparison of femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3D-CT study
title_sort comparison of femoral tunnel placement in acl reconstruction using a 70° arthroscope through the anterolateral portal versus a 30° arthroscope through the anteromedial portal: a pilot 3d-ct study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-020-00037-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kosyjonathand acomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy
AT walmsleykatie acomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy
AT sharmaakashd acomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy
AT gordonelizabetha acomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy
AT heddonsadiev acomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy
AT anaspurerahul acomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy
AT schranzpeterj acomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy
AT mandaliavipuli acomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy
AT kosyjonathand comparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy
AT walmsleykatie comparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy
AT sharmaakashd comparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy
AT gordonelizabetha comparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy
AT heddonsadiev comparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy
AT anaspurerahul comparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy
AT schranzpeterj comparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy
AT mandaliavipuli comparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementinaclreconstructionusinga70arthroscopethroughtheanterolateralportalversusa30arthroscopethroughtheanteromedialportalapilot3dctstudy