Cargando…

Evaluation of the Sheet Resistance of Inkjet-Printed Ag-Layers on Flexible, Uncoated Paper Substrates Using Van-der-Pauw’s Method

With the growing significance of printed sensors on the electronics market, new demands on quality and reproducibility have arisen. While most printing processes on standard substrates (e.g., Polyethylene terephthalate (PET)) are well-defined, the printing on substrates with rather porous, fibrous a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zikulnig, Johanna, Roshanghias, Ali, Rauter, Lukas, Hirschl, Christina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32340200
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20082398
_version_ 1783532976750985216
author Zikulnig, Johanna
Roshanghias, Ali
Rauter, Lukas
Hirschl, Christina
author_facet Zikulnig, Johanna
Roshanghias, Ali
Rauter, Lukas
Hirschl, Christina
author_sort Zikulnig, Johanna
collection PubMed
description With the growing significance of printed sensors on the electronics market, new demands on quality and reproducibility have arisen. While most printing processes on standard substrates (e.g., Polyethylene terephthalate (PET)) are well-defined, the printing on substrates with rather porous, fibrous and rough surfaces (e.g., uncoated paper) contains new challenges. Especially in the case of inkjet-printing and other deposition techniques that require low-viscous nanoparticle inks the solvents and deposition materials might be absorbed, inhibiting the formation of homogeneous conductive layers. As part of this work, the sheet resistance of sintered inkjet-printed conductive silver (Ag-) nanoparticle cross structures on two different, commercially available, uncoated paper substrates using Van-der-Pauw’s method is evaluated. The results are compared to the conductivity of well-studied, white heat stabilised and treated PET foil. While the sheet resistance on PET substrate is highly reproducible and the variations are solely process-dependent, the sheet resistance on uncoated paper depends more on the substrate properties themselves. The results indicate that the achievable conductivity as well as the reproducibility decrease with increasing substrate porosity and fibrousness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7219343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72193432020-05-22 Evaluation of the Sheet Resistance of Inkjet-Printed Ag-Layers on Flexible, Uncoated Paper Substrates Using Van-der-Pauw’s Method Zikulnig, Johanna Roshanghias, Ali Rauter, Lukas Hirschl, Christina Sensors (Basel) Article With the growing significance of printed sensors on the electronics market, new demands on quality and reproducibility have arisen. While most printing processes on standard substrates (e.g., Polyethylene terephthalate (PET)) are well-defined, the printing on substrates with rather porous, fibrous and rough surfaces (e.g., uncoated paper) contains new challenges. Especially in the case of inkjet-printing and other deposition techniques that require low-viscous nanoparticle inks the solvents and deposition materials might be absorbed, inhibiting the formation of homogeneous conductive layers. As part of this work, the sheet resistance of sintered inkjet-printed conductive silver (Ag-) nanoparticle cross structures on two different, commercially available, uncoated paper substrates using Van-der-Pauw’s method is evaluated. The results are compared to the conductivity of well-studied, white heat stabilised and treated PET foil. While the sheet resistance on PET substrate is highly reproducible and the variations are solely process-dependent, the sheet resistance on uncoated paper depends more on the substrate properties themselves. The results indicate that the achievable conductivity as well as the reproducibility decrease with increasing substrate porosity and fibrousness. MDPI 2020-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7219343/ /pubmed/32340200 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20082398 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zikulnig, Johanna
Roshanghias, Ali
Rauter, Lukas
Hirschl, Christina
Evaluation of the Sheet Resistance of Inkjet-Printed Ag-Layers on Flexible, Uncoated Paper Substrates Using Van-der-Pauw’s Method
title Evaluation of the Sheet Resistance of Inkjet-Printed Ag-Layers on Flexible, Uncoated Paper Substrates Using Van-der-Pauw’s Method
title_full Evaluation of the Sheet Resistance of Inkjet-Printed Ag-Layers on Flexible, Uncoated Paper Substrates Using Van-der-Pauw’s Method
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Sheet Resistance of Inkjet-Printed Ag-Layers on Flexible, Uncoated Paper Substrates Using Van-der-Pauw’s Method
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Sheet Resistance of Inkjet-Printed Ag-Layers on Flexible, Uncoated Paper Substrates Using Van-der-Pauw’s Method
title_short Evaluation of the Sheet Resistance of Inkjet-Printed Ag-Layers on Flexible, Uncoated Paper Substrates Using Van-der-Pauw’s Method
title_sort evaluation of the sheet resistance of inkjet-printed ag-layers on flexible, uncoated paper substrates using van-der-pauw’s method
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32340200
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20082398
work_keys_str_mv AT zikulnigjohanna evaluationofthesheetresistanceofinkjetprintedaglayersonflexibleuncoatedpapersubstratesusingvanderpauwsmethod
AT roshanghiasali evaluationofthesheetresistanceofinkjetprintedaglayersonflexibleuncoatedpapersubstratesusingvanderpauwsmethod
AT rauterlukas evaluationofthesheetresistanceofinkjetprintedaglayersonflexibleuncoatedpapersubstratesusingvanderpauwsmethod
AT hirschlchristina evaluationofthesheetresistanceofinkjetprintedaglayersonflexibleuncoatedpapersubstratesusingvanderpauwsmethod