Cargando…

The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides

PURPOSE: Posterior root repair of the medial meniscus (MM) can prevent rapid progression of knee osteoarthritis in patients with a MM posterior root tear (MMPRT). The anatomic reattachment of the MM posterior root is considered to be critical in a transtibial pullout repair. However, tibial tunnel c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Furumatsu, Takayuki, Okazaki, Yuki, Kodama, Yuya, Okazaki, Yoshiki, Kamatsuki, Yusuke, Masuda, Shin, Hiranaka, Takaaki, Ozaki, Toshifumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-019-0007-1
_version_ 1783533011498696704
author Furumatsu, Takayuki
Okazaki, Yuki
Kodama, Yuya
Okazaki, Yoshiki
Kamatsuki, Yusuke
Masuda, Shin
Hiranaka, Takaaki
Ozaki, Toshifumi
author_facet Furumatsu, Takayuki
Okazaki, Yuki
Kodama, Yuya
Okazaki, Yoshiki
Kamatsuki, Yusuke
Masuda, Shin
Hiranaka, Takaaki
Ozaki, Toshifumi
author_sort Furumatsu, Takayuki
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Posterior root repair of the medial meniscus (MM) can prevent rapid progression of knee osteoarthritis in patients with a MM posterior root tear (MMPRT). The anatomic reattachment of the MM posterior root is considered to be critical in a transtibial pullout repair. However, tibial tunnel creation at the anatomic attachment is technically difficult. We hypothesized that a newly developed point-contact aiming guide [Unicorn Meniscal Root (UMR) guide] can create the tibial tunnel at a better position rather than a previously designed MMPRT guide. The aim of this study was to compare the position of the created tibial tunnel between the two meniscal root repair guides. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients underwent transtibial pullout repairs. Tibial tunnel creation was performed using the UMR guide (19 cases) or MMPRT guide (19 cases). Three-dimensional computed tomography images of the tibial surface were evaluated using the Tsukada’s measurement method postoperatively. The expected anatomic center of the MM posterior root attachment was defined as the center of three tangential lines referring to three anatomic bony landmarks (anterior border of the posterior cruciate ligament, lateral margin of the medial tibial plateau, and retro-eminence ridge). The expected anatomic center and tibial tunnel center were evaluated using the percentage-based posterolateral location on the tibial surface. The distance between the anatomic center and tunnel center was calculated. RESULTS: The anatomic center of the MM posterior root footprint was located at a position of 79.2% posterior and 39.5% lateral. The mean of the tunnel center in the UMR guide was similar to that in the MMPRT guide (posterior direction, P = 0.096; lateral direction, P = 0.280). The mean distances between the tunnel center and the anatomic center were 4.06 and 3.99 mm in the UMR and MMPRT guide group, respectively (P = 0.455). CONCLUSIONS: The UMR guide, as well as the MMPRT guide, is a useful device to create favorable tibial tunnels at the MM posterior root attachment for pullout repairs in patients with MMPRTs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7219562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72195622020-05-14 The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides Furumatsu, Takayuki Okazaki, Yuki Kodama, Yuya Okazaki, Yoshiki Kamatsuki, Yusuke Masuda, Shin Hiranaka, Takaaki Ozaki, Toshifumi Knee Surg Relat Res Research Article PURPOSE: Posterior root repair of the medial meniscus (MM) can prevent rapid progression of knee osteoarthritis in patients with a MM posterior root tear (MMPRT). The anatomic reattachment of the MM posterior root is considered to be critical in a transtibial pullout repair. However, tibial tunnel creation at the anatomic attachment is technically difficult. We hypothesized that a newly developed point-contact aiming guide [Unicorn Meniscal Root (UMR) guide] can create the tibial tunnel at a better position rather than a previously designed MMPRT guide. The aim of this study was to compare the position of the created tibial tunnel between the two meniscal root repair guides. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients underwent transtibial pullout repairs. Tibial tunnel creation was performed using the UMR guide (19 cases) or MMPRT guide (19 cases). Three-dimensional computed tomography images of the tibial surface were evaluated using the Tsukada’s measurement method postoperatively. The expected anatomic center of the MM posterior root attachment was defined as the center of three tangential lines referring to three anatomic bony landmarks (anterior border of the posterior cruciate ligament, lateral margin of the medial tibial plateau, and retro-eminence ridge). The expected anatomic center and tibial tunnel center were evaluated using the percentage-based posterolateral location on the tibial surface. The distance between the anatomic center and tunnel center was calculated. RESULTS: The anatomic center of the MM posterior root footprint was located at a position of 79.2% posterior and 39.5% lateral. The mean of the tunnel center in the UMR guide was similar to that in the MMPRT guide (posterior direction, P = 0.096; lateral direction, P = 0.280). The mean distances between the tunnel center and the anatomic center were 4.06 and 3.99 mm in the UMR and MMPRT guide group, respectively (P = 0.455). CONCLUSIONS: The UMR guide, as well as the MMPRT guide, is a useful device to create favorable tibial tunnels at the MM posterior root attachment for pullout repairs in patients with MMPRTs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV BioMed Central 2019-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7219562/ /pubmed/32660577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-019-0007-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Furumatsu, Takayuki
Okazaki, Yuki
Kodama, Yuya
Okazaki, Yoshiki
Kamatsuki, Yusuke
Masuda, Shin
Hiranaka, Takaaki
Ozaki, Toshifumi
The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides
title The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides
title_full The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides
title_fullStr The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides
title_full_unstemmed The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides
title_short The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides
title_sort accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-019-0007-1
work_keys_str_mv AT furumatsutakayuki theaccuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides
AT okazakiyuki theaccuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides
AT kodamayuya theaccuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides
AT okazakiyoshiki theaccuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides
AT kamatsukiyusuke theaccuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides
AT masudashin theaccuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides
AT hiranakatakaaki theaccuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides
AT ozakitoshifumi theaccuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides
AT furumatsutakayuki accuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides
AT okazakiyuki accuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides
AT kodamayuya accuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides
AT okazakiyoshiki accuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides
AT kamatsukiyusuke accuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides
AT masudashin accuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides
AT hiranakatakaaki accuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides
AT ozakitoshifumi accuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides