Cargando…
The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides
PURPOSE: Posterior root repair of the medial meniscus (MM) can prevent rapid progression of knee osteoarthritis in patients with a MM posterior root tear (MMPRT). The anatomic reattachment of the MM posterior root is considered to be critical in a transtibial pullout repair. However, tibial tunnel c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-019-0007-1 |
_version_ | 1783533011498696704 |
---|---|
author | Furumatsu, Takayuki Okazaki, Yuki Kodama, Yuya Okazaki, Yoshiki Kamatsuki, Yusuke Masuda, Shin Hiranaka, Takaaki Ozaki, Toshifumi |
author_facet | Furumatsu, Takayuki Okazaki, Yuki Kodama, Yuya Okazaki, Yoshiki Kamatsuki, Yusuke Masuda, Shin Hiranaka, Takaaki Ozaki, Toshifumi |
author_sort | Furumatsu, Takayuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Posterior root repair of the medial meniscus (MM) can prevent rapid progression of knee osteoarthritis in patients with a MM posterior root tear (MMPRT). The anatomic reattachment of the MM posterior root is considered to be critical in a transtibial pullout repair. However, tibial tunnel creation at the anatomic attachment is technically difficult. We hypothesized that a newly developed point-contact aiming guide [Unicorn Meniscal Root (UMR) guide] can create the tibial tunnel at a better position rather than a previously designed MMPRT guide. The aim of this study was to compare the position of the created tibial tunnel between the two meniscal root repair guides. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients underwent transtibial pullout repairs. Tibial tunnel creation was performed using the UMR guide (19 cases) or MMPRT guide (19 cases). Three-dimensional computed tomography images of the tibial surface were evaluated using the Tsukada’s measurement method postoperatively. The expected anatomic center of the MM posterior root attachment was defined as the center of three tangential lines referring to three anatomic bony landmarks (anterior border of the posterior cruciate ligament, lateral margin of the medial tibial plateau, and retro-eminence ridge). The expected anatomic center and tibial tunnel center were evaluated using the percentage-based posterolateral location on the tibial surface. The distance between the anatomic center and tunnel center was calculated. RESULTS: The anatomic center of the MM posterior root footprint was located at a position of 79.2% posterior and 39.5% lateral. The mean of the tunnel center in the UMR guide was similar to that in the MMPRT guide (posterior direction, P = 0.096; lateral direction, P = 0.280). The mean distances between the tunnel center and the anatomic center were 4.06 and 3.99 mm in the UMR and MMPRT guide group, respectively (P = 0.455). CONCLUSIONS: The UMR guide, as well as the MMPRT guide, is a useful device to create favorable tibial tunnels at the MM posterior root attachment for pullout repairs in patients with MMPRTs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7219562 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72195622020-05-14 The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides Furumatsu, Takayuki Okazaki, Yuki Kodama, Yuya Okazaki, Yoshiki Kamatsuki, Yusuke Masuda, Shin Hiranaka, Takaaki Ozaki, Toshifumi Knee Surg Relat Res Research Article PURPOSE: Posterior root repair of the medial meniscus (MM) can prevent rapid progression of knee osteoarthritis in patients with a MM posterior root tear (MMPRT). The anatomic reattachment of the MM posterior root is considered to be critical in a transtibial pullout repair. However, tibial tunnel creation at the anatomic attachment is technically difficult. We hypothesized that a newly developed point-contact aiming guide [Unicorn Meniscal Root (UMR) guide] can create the tibial tunnel at a better position rather than a previously designed MMPRT guide. The aim of this study was to compare the position of the created tibial tunnel between the two meniscal root repair guides. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients underwent transtibial pullout repairs. Tibial tunnel creation was performed using the UMR guide (19 cases) or MMPRT guide (19 cases). Three-dimensional computed tomography images of the tibial surface were evaluated using the Tsukada’s measurement method postoperatively. The expected anatomic center of the MM posterior root attachment was defined as the center of three tangential lines referring to three anatomic bony landmarks (anterior border of the posterior cruciate ligament, lateral margin of the medial tibial plateau, and retro-eminence ridge). The expected anatomic center and tibial tunnel center were evaluated using the percentage-based posterolateral location on the tibial surface. The distance between the anatomic center and tunnel center was calculated. RESULTS: The anatomic center of the MM posterior root footprint was located at a position of 79.2% posterior and 39.5% lateral. The mean of the tunnel center in the UMR guide was similar to that in the MMPRT guide (posterior direction, P = 0.096; lateral direction, P = 0.280). The mean distances between the tunnel center and the anatomic center were 4.06 and 3.99 mm in the UMR and MMPRT guide group, respectively (P = 0.455). CONCLUSIONS: The UMR guide, as well as the MMPRT guide, is a useful device to create favorable tibial tunnels at the MM posterior root attachment for pullout repairs in patients with MMPRTs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV BioMed Central 2019-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7219562/ /pubmed/32660577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-019-0007-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Furumatsu, Takayuki Okazaki, Yuki Kodama, Yuya Okazaki, Yoshiki Kamatsuki, Yusuke Masuda, Shin Hiranaka, Takaaki Ozaki, Toshifumi The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides |
title | The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides |
title_full | The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides |
title_fullStr | The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides |
title_full_unstemmed | The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides |
title_short | The accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides |
title_sort | accuracy of a newly developed guide system in medial meniscus posterior root repair: a comparison between two aiming guides |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43019-019-0007-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT furumatsutakayuki theaccuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides AT okazakiyuki theaccuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides AT kodamayuya theaccuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides AT okazakiyoshiki theaccuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides AT kamatsukiyusuke theaccuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides AT masudashin theaccuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides AT hiranakatakaaki theaccuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides AT ozakitoshifumi theaccuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides AT furumatsutakayuki accuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides AT okazakiyuki accuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides AT kodamayuya accuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides AT okazakiyoshiki accuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides AT kamatsukiyusuke accuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides AT masudashin accuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides AT hiranakatakaaki accuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides AT ozakitoshifumi accuracyofanewlydevelopedguidesysteminmedialmeniscusposteriorrootrepairacomparisonbetweentwoaimingguides |