Cargando…
Some Metatheoretical Principles for Personality Neuroscience
Theories in personality neuroscience must aim to be consistent with several levels of explanation. If we view personality traits as constructs located only at the psychological level, we must still make their explanations compatible with observations and theories at lower levels, particularly with w...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pen.2018.9 |
_version_ | 1783533031625064448 |
---|---|
author | McNaughton, Neil Smillie, Luke D. |
author_facet | McNaughton, Neil Smillie, Luke D. |
author_sort | McNaughton, Neil |
collection | PubMed |
description | Theories in personality neuroscience must aim to be consistent with several levels of explanation. If we view personality traits as constructs located only at the psychological level, we must still make their explanations compatible with observations and theories at lower levels, particularly with what we know at the neural level. If we view personality traits as constructs located only at the neural level, we will still need to predict their emergent effects at the psychological level. Personality theory at present treats traits as psychological-level constructs, with even the recent neurally oriented Cybernetic Big Five Theory specified in terms of a “conceptual nervous system” and not requiring complete or immediate translation into neural mechanisms. Here, we argue for the existence of phylogenetically old, neural-level traits that are substantially conserved across many vertebrate species. We first ask what known mechanisms control trait-like properties of neural systems: Focusing on hormones, the GABA(A) receptor, and amine neurotransmitter systems. We derive from what we know about these sources of neuronal modulation some metatheoretical principles to guide the future development of those aspects of personality theory, starting with neural-level trait constructs and drawing implications for higher-level trait psychology observations. Current descriptive approaches such as the Big Five are an essential precursor to personality neuroscience, but may not map one-to-one to the mechanisms and constructs of a neuroscience-based approach to traits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7219693 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72196932020-05-20 Some Metatheoretical Principles for Personality Neuroscience McNaughton, Neil Smillie, Luke D. Personal Neurosci Review Paper Theories in personality neuroscience must aim to be consistent with several levels of explanation. If we view personality traits as constructs located only at the psychological level, we must still make their explanations compatible with observations and theories at lower levels, particularly with what we know at the neural level. If we view personality traits as constructs located only at the neural level, we will still need to predict their emergent effects at the psychological level. Personality theory at present treats traits as psychological-level constructs, with even the recent neurally oriented Cybernetic Big Five Theory specified in terms of a “conceptual nervous system” and not requiring complete or immediate translation into neural mechanisms. Here, we argue for the existence of phylogenetically old, neural-level traits that are substantially conserved across many vertebrate species. We first ask what known mechanisms control trait-like properties of neural systems: Focusing on hormones, the GABA(A) receptor, and amine neurotransmitter systems. We derive from what we know about these sources of neuronal modulation some metatheoretical principles to guide the future development of those aspects of personality theory, starting with neural-level trait constructs and drawing implications for higher-level trait psychology observations. Current descriptive approaches such as the Big Five are an essential precursor to personality neuroscience, but may not map one-to-one to the mechanisms and constructs of a neuroscience-based approach to traits. Cambridge University Press 2018-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7219693/ /pubmed/32435730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pen.2018.9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work. |
spellingShingle | Review Paper McNaughton, Neil Smillie, Luke D. Some Metatheoretical Principles for Personality Neuroscience |
title | Some Metatheoretical Principles for Personality Neuroscience |
title_full | Some Metatheoretical Principles for Personality Neuroscience |
title_fullStr | Some Metatheoretical Principles for Personality Neuroscience |
title_full_unstemmed | Some Metatheoretical Principles for Personality Neuroscience |
title_short | Some Metatheoretical Principles for Personality Neuroscience |
title_sort | some metatheoretical principles for personality neuroscience |
topic | Review Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pen.2018.9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcnaughtonneil somemetatheoreticalprinciplesforpersonalityneuroscience AT smillieluked somemetatheoreticalprinciplesforpersonalityneuroscience |