Cargando…
Process evaluation of health system costing – Experience from CHSI study in India
BACKGROUND: A national study, ‘Costing of healthcare services in India’ (CHSI) aimed at generating reliable healthcare cost estimates for health technology assessment and price-setting is being undertaken in India. CHSI sampled 52 public and 40 private hospitals in 13 states and used a mixed micro-c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32401763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232873 |
_version_ | 1783533048059396096 |
---|---|
author | Prinja, Shankar Brar, Sehr Singh, Maninder Pal Rajsekhar, Kavitha Sachin, Oshima Naik, Jyotsna Singh, Malkeet Tomar, Himanshi Bahuguna, Pankaj Guinness, Lorna |
author_facet | Prinja, Shankar Brar, Sehr Singh, Maninder Pal Rajsekhar, Kavitha Sachin, Oshima Naik, Jyotsna Singh, Malkeet Tomar, Himanshi Bahuguna, Pankaj Guinness, Lorna |
author_sort | Prinja, Shankar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A national study, ‘Costing of healthcare services in India’ (CHSI) aimed at generating reliable healthcare cost estimates for health technology assessment and price-setting is being undertaken in India. CHSI sampled 52 public and 40 private hospitals in 13 states and used a mixed micro-costing approach. This paper aims to outline the process, challenges and critical lessons of cost data collection to feed methodological and quality improvement of data collection. METHODS: An exploratory survey with 3 components–an online semi-structured questionnaire, group discussion and review of monitoring data, was conducted amongst CHSI data collection teams. There were qualitative and quantitative components. Difficulty in obtaining individual data was rated on a Likert scale. RESULTS: Mean time taken to complete cost data collection in one department/speciality was 7.86(±0.51) months, majority of which was spent on data entry and data issues resolution. Data collection was most difficult for determination of equipment usage (mean difficulty score 6.59±0.52), consumables prices (6.09±0.58), equipment price(6.05±0.72), and furniture price(5.64±0.68). Human resources, drugs & consumables contributed to 78% of total cost and 31% of data collection time. However, furniture, overheads and equipment consumed 51% of time contributing only 9% of total cost. Seeking multiple permissions, absence of electronic records, multiple sources of data were key challenges causing delays. CONCLUSIONS: Micro-costing is time and resource intensive. Addressing key issues prior to data collection would ease the process of data collection, improve quality of estimates and aid priority setting. Electronic health records and availability of national cost data base would facilitate conducting costing studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7219765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72197652020-06-01 Process evaluation of health system costing – Experience from CHSI study in India Prinja, Shankar Brar, Sehr Singh, Maninder Pal Rajsekhar, Kavitha Sachin, Oshima Naik, Jyotsna Singh, Malkeet Tomar, Himanshi Bahuguna, Pankaj Guinness, Lorna PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: A national study, ‘Costing of healthcare services in India’ (CHSI) aimed at generating reliable healthcare cost estimates for health technology assessment and price-setting is being undertaken in India. CHSI sampled 52 public and 40 private hospitals in 13 states and used a mixed micro-costing approach. This paper aims to outline the process, challenges and critical lessons of cost data collection to feed methodological and quality improvement of data collection. METHODS: An exploratory survey with 3 components–an online semi-structured questionnaire, group discussion and review of monitoring data, was conducted amongst CHSI data collection teams. There were qualitative and quantitative components. Difficulty in obtaining individual data was rated on a Likert scale. RESULTS: Mean time taken to complete cost data collection in one department/speciality was 7.86(±0.51) months, majority of which was spent on data entry and data issues resolution. Data collection was most difficult for determination of equipment usage (mean difficulty score 6.59±0.52), consumables prices (6.09±0.58), equipment price(6.05±0.72), and furniture price(5.64±0.68). Human resources, drugs & consumables contributed to 78% of total cost and 31% of data collection time. However, furniture, overheads and equipment consumed 51% of time contributing only 9% of total cost. Seeking multiple permissions, absence of electronic records, multiple sources of data were key challenges causing delays. CONCLUSIONS: Micro-costing is time and resource intensive. Addressing key issues prior to data collection would ease the process of data collection, improve quality of estimates and aid priority setting. Electronic health records and availability of national cost data base would facilitate conducting costing studies. Public Library of Science 2020-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7219765/ /pubmed/32401763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232873 Text en © 2020 Prinja et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Prinja, Shankar Brar, Sehr Singh, Maninder Pal Rajsekhar, Kavitha Sachin, Oshima Naik, Jyotsna Singh, Malkeet Tomar, Himanshi Bahuguna, Pankaj Guinness, Lorna Process evaluation of health system costing – Experience from CHSI study in India |
title | Process evaluation of health system costing – Experience from CHSI study in India |
title_full | Process evaluation of health system costing – Experience from CHSI study in India |
title_fullStr | Process evaluation of health system costing – Experience from CHSI study in India |
title_full_unstemmed | Process evaluation of health system costing – Experience from CHSI study in India |
title_short | Process evaluation of health system costing – Experience from CHSI study in India |
title_sort | process evaluation of health system costing – experience from chsi study in india |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32401763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232873 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prinjashankar processevaluationofhealthsystemcostingexperiencefromchsistudyinindia AT brarsehr processevaluationofhealthsystemcostingexperiencefromchsistudyinindia AT singhmaninderpal processevaluationofhealthsystemcostingexperiencefromchsistudyinindia AT rajsekharkavitha processevaluationofhealthsystemcostingexperiencefromchsistudyinindia AT sachinoshima processevaluationofhealthsystemcostingexperiencefromchsistudyinindia AT naikjyotsna processevaluationofhealthsystemcostingexperiencefromchsistudyinindia AT singhmalkeet processevaluationofhealthsystemcostingexperiencefromchsistudyinindia AT tomarhimanshi processevaluationofhealthsystemcostingexperiencefromchsistudyinindia AT processevaluationofhealthsystemcostingexperiencefromchsistudyinindia AT bahugunapankaj processevaluationofhealthsystemcostingexperiencefromchsistudyinindia AT guinnesslorna processevaluationofhealthsystemcostingexperiencefromchsistudyinindia |