Cargando…

Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of massage chair therapy versus basic physiotherapy in lower back pain patients: A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain is a chronic recurrent symptom, which can lower the patient's quality of life. With technological development of automated home massage systems, now offers a promising alternative to physiotherapy. However, thus far, the effectiveness of such methods has not been eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Seung-Kook, Min, Aran, Jeon, Chuljin, Kim, Taeyun, Cho, Soohyun, Lee, Su-Chan, Lee, Choon-Key
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32195952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019514
_version_ 1783533091085615104
author Kim, Seung-Kook
Min, Aran
Jeon, Chuljin
Kim, Taeyun
Cho, Soohyun
Lee, Su-Chan
Lee, Choon-Key
author_facet Kim, Seung-Kook
Min, Aran
Jeon, Chuljin
Kim, Taeyun
Cho, Soohyun
Lee, Su-Chan
Lee, Choon-Key
author_sort Kim, Seung-Kook
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Low back pain is a chronic recurrent symptom, which can lower the patient's quality of life. With technological development of automated home massage systems, now offers a promising alternative to physiotherapy. However, thus far, the effectiveness of such methods has not been evaluated. We aimed to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a massage chair with those of conventional physiotherapy for the treatment. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial with a two-group parallel design. Following randomization and allocation, 56 participants were enrolled to receive either physiotherapy (n = 25) or mechanical massage using the massage chair (n = 31). Pain severity was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) and satisfaction assessed with the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Quality of life modification was analyzed using the Functional Rating Index (FRI). Cost-effectiveness was analyzed by comparing the sum of physiotherapy fees and monthly rental fees for chair massage. RESULTS: Physiotherapy and massage chair were both effective for pain control as assessed with the VAS (P < .001), satisfaction as assessed by MPQ (P < .001) and life quality improvement as assessed by FRI (P < .001) in both groups. Both VAS and FRI scores were significantly higher for physiotherapy than for massage chair (P = .03 and P = .03, respectively). There was no significant difference in MPQ between the two groups. Massage chair therapy was more cost-effective than physiotherapy, at only 60.17% of the physiotherapy cost (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The home massage chair system was cost-effective, but pain control and disability improved more with physiotherapy. However, our results showed that the massage chair is a promising treatment for pain control and quality of life modification, but efficacy is still superior in physiotherapy and the chair is not a replacement for physiotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service, KCT0003157. Retrospectively registered August 2, 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7220115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72201152020-06-15 Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of massage chair therapy versus basic physiotherapy in lower back pain patients: A randomized controlled trial Kim, Seung-Kook Min, Aran Jeon, Chuljin Kim, Taeyun Cho, Soohyun Lee, Su-Chan Lee, Choon-Key Medicine (Baltimore) 3800 INTRODUCTION: Low back pain is a chronic recurrent symptom, which can lower the patient's quality of life. With technological development of automated home massage systems, now offers a promising alternative to physiotherapy. However, thus far, the effectiveness of such methods has not been evaluated. We aimed to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a massage chair with those of conventional physiotherapy for the treatment. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial with a two-group parallel design. Following randomization and allocation, 56 participants were enrolled to receive either physiotherapy (n = 25) or mechanical massage using the massage chair (n = 31). Pain severity was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) and satisfaction assessed with the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Quality of life modification was analyzed using the Functional Rating Index (FRI). Cost-effectiveness was analyzed by comparing the sum of physiotherapy fees and monthly rental fees for chair massage. RESULTS: Physiotherapy and massage chair were both effective for pain control as assessed with the VAS (P < .001), satisfaction as assessed by MPQ (P < .001) and life quality improvement as assessed by FRI (P < .001) in both groups. Both VAS and FRI scores were significantly higher for physiotherapy than for massage chair (P = .03 and P = .03, respectively). There was no significant difference in MPQ between the two groups. Massage chair therapy was more cost-effective than physiotherapy, at only 60.17% of the physiotherapy cost (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The home massage chair system was cost-effective, but pain control and disability improved more with physiotherapy. However, our results showed that the massage chair is a promising treatment for pain control and quality of life modification, but efficacy is still superior in physiotherapy and the chair is not a replacement for physiotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service, KCT0003157. Retrospectively registered August 2, 2018. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7220115/ /pubmed/32195952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019514 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 3800
Kim, Seung-Kook
Min, Aran
Jeon, Chuljin
Kim, Taeyun
Cho, Soohyun
Lee, Su-Chan
Lee, Choon-Key
Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of massage chair therapy versus basic physiotherapy in lower back pain patients: A randomized controlled trial
title Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of massage chair therapy versus basic physiotherapy in lower back pain patients: A randomized controlled trial
title_full Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of massage chair therapy versus basic physiotherapy in lower back pain patients: A randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of massage chair therapy versus basic physiotherapy in lower back pain patients: A randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of massage chair therapy versus basic physiotherapy in lower back pain patients: A randomized controlled trial
title_short Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of massage chair therapy versus basic physiotherapy in lower back pain patients: A randomized controlled trial
title_sort clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of massage chair therapy versus basic physiotherapy in lower back pain patients: a randomized controlled trial
topic 3800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32195952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019514
work_keys_str_mv AT kimseungkook clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofmassagechairtherapyversusbasicphysiotherapyinlowerbackpainpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT minaran clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofmassagechairtherapyversusbasicphysiotherapyinlowerbackpainpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jeonchuljin clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofmassagechairtherapyversusbasicphysiotherapyinlowerbackpainpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimtaeyun clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofmassagechairtherapyversusbasicphysiotherapyinlowerbackpainpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chosoohyun clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofmassagechairtherapyversusbasicphysiotherapyinlowerbackpainpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leesuchan clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofmassagechairtherapyversusbasicphysiotherapyinlowerbackpainpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leechoonkey clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofmassagechairtherapyversusbasicphysiotherapyinlowerbackpainpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial