Cargando…

Circumferential penile defect reconstruction with pull-up double-opposing keystone-designed perforator island flaps: A case report

RATIONALE: The challenges with reconstruction of penile defects are plenty. In addition, no single and universally accepted reconstructive method exists for penile defect repair. Herein, we present the application of a circumferential penile shaft defect reconstruction using pull-up double-opposing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Hyun Gun, Lim, Soo Yeon, Yoon, Chi Sun, Kim, Kyu Nam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32011463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018762
_version_ 1783533109254291456
author Lee, Hyun Gun
Lim, Soo Yeon
Yoon, Chi Sun
Kim, Kyu Nam
author_facet Lee, Hyun Gun
Lim, Soo Yeon
Yoon, Chi Sun
Kim, Kyu Nam
author_sort Lee, Hyun Gun
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: The challenges with reconstruction of penile defects are plenty. In addition, no single and universally accepted reconstructive method exists for penile defect repair. Herein, we present the application of a circumferential penile shaft defect reconstruction using pull-up double-opposing keystone-designed perforator island flaps (KDPIFs) in one patient. This is the first case report of a circumferential penile shaft defect reconstruction using KDPIFs. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 43-year-old man who injected petroleum jelly into his penis 10 years ago presented with multiple firm nodular mass-like lesions adherent to the overlying skin along the penile shaft. Our urologic surgeon removed the foreign bodies and performed a primary closure with undermining. However, wound dehiscence developed, and skin necrosis was exacerbated 5 days postoperatively. DIAGNOSES: We performed debridement, and the final post-debridement defect was circumferential (5.5 × 12 cm) from the base of the glans to the midpoint of the penile shaft. INTERVENTIONS: We covered the defect using pull-up double-opposing KDPIFs (10 × 13 cm each) based on the hot spots of the superficial external pudendal artery perforators on each side from the suprapubic area to the scrotum. OUTCOMES: The flaps survived perfectly, with no postoperative complications. The patient was satisfied with the final outcome and had no erectile dysfunction or shortening of penile length after a 6-month follow-up. LESSONS: We successfully reconstructed a circumferential penile defect with pull-up double-opposing KDPIFs both esthetically and functionally. Our technique can be a good alternative modality for extensive penile defect reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7220202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72202022020-06-15 Circumferential penile defect reconstruction with pull-up double-opposing keystone-designed perforator island flaps: A case report Lee, Hyun Gun Lim, Soo Yeon Yoon, Chi Sun Kim, Kyu Nam Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 RATIONALE: The challenges with reconstruction of penile defects are plenty. In addition, no single and universally accepted reconstructive method exists for penile defect repair. Herein, we present the application of a circumferential penile shaft defect reconstruction using pull-up double-opposing keystone-designed perforator island flaps (KDPIFs) in one patient. This is the first case report of a circumferential penile shaft defect reconstruction using KDPIFs. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 43-year-old man who injected petroleum jelly into his penis 10 years ago presented with multiple firm nodular mass-like lesions adherent to the overlying skin along the penile shaft. Our urologic surgeon removed the foreign bodies and performed a primary closure with undermining. However, wound dehiscence developed, and skin necrosis was exacerbated 5 days postoperatively. DIAGNOSES: We performed debridement, and the final post-debridement defect was circumferential (5.5 × 12 cm) from the base of the glans to the midpoint of the penile shaft. INTERVENTIONS: We covered the defect using pull-up double-opposing KDPIFs (10 × 13 cm each) based on the hot spots of the superficial external pudendal artery perforators on each side from the suprapubic area to the scrotum. OUTCOMES: The flaps survived perfectly, with no postoperative complications. The patient was satisfied with the final outcome and had no erectile dysfunction or shortening of penile length after a 6-month follow-up. LESSONS: We successfully reconstructed a circumferential penile defect with pull-up double-opposing KDPIFs both esthetically and functionally. Our technique can be a good alternative modality for extensive penile defect reconstruction. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7220202/ /pubmed/32011463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018762 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Lee, Hyun Gun
Lim, Soo Yeon
Yoon, Chi Sun
Kim, Kyu Nam
Circumferential penile defect reconstruction with pull-up double-opposing keystone-designed perforator island flaps: A case report
title Circumferential penile defect reconstruction with pull-up double-opposing keystone-designed perforator island flaps: A case report
title_full Circumferential penile defect reconstruction with pull-up double-opposing keystone-designed perforator island flaps: A case report
title_fullStr Circumferential penile defect reconstruction with pull-up double-opposing keystone-designed perforator island flaps: A case report
title_full_unstemmed Circumferential penile defect reconstruction with pull-up double-opposing keystone-designed perforator island flaps: A case report
title_short Circumferential penile defect reconstruction with pull-up double-opposing keystone-designed perforator island flaps: A case report
title_sort circumferential penile defect reconstruction with pull-up double-opposing keystone-designed perforator island flaps: a case report
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32011463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018762
work_keys_str_mv AT leehyungun circumferentialpeniledefectreconstructionwithpullupdoubleopposingkeystonedesignedperforatorislandflapsacasereport
AT limsooyeon circumferentialpeniledefectreconstructionwithpullupdoubleopposingkeystonedesignedperforatorislandflapsacasereport
AT yoonchisun circumferentialpeniledefectreconstructionwithpullupdoubleopposingkeystonedesignedperforatorislandflapsacasereport
AT kimkyunam circumferentialpeniledefectreconstructionwithpullupdoubleopposingkeystonedesignedperforatorislandflapsacasereport