Cargando…

The association between the socioeconomic status and body pain: A nationwide survey

Pain is a significant burden among different communities, but little is known regarding the epidemiology of pain, particularly with respect to socioeconomic status (SES). The aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence of body pain and to identify risk factors of pain in middle-aged and older Ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Tong, Wei, Zhen, Xu, Tan, Gamber, Michelle, Han, Jingnan, Jiang, Yan, Li, Jian, Yang, Daihe, Sun, Wenjie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32195941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019454
_version_ 1783533173333819392
author Yu, Tong
Wei, Zhen
Xu, Tan
Gamber, Michelle
Han, Jingnan
Jiang, Yan
Li, Jian
Yang, Daihe
Sun, Wenjie
author_facet Yu, Tong
Wei, Zhen
Xu, Tan
Gamber, Michelle
Han, Jingnan
Jiang, Yan
Li, Jian
Yang, Daihe
Sun, Wenjie
author_sort Yu, Tong
collection PubMed
description Pain is a significant burden among different communities, but little is known regarding the epidemiology of pain, particularly with respect to socioeconomic status (SES). The aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence of body pain and to identify risk factors of pain in middle-aged and older Chinese. The data were extracted from the 2008 Chinese Suboptimal Health Study that consisted of 18,316 Chinese subjects aged 18 to 65 years. Information on SES including occupation and education levels and body pain were collected. A Likert scale was used to evaluate reported body pain. We used the multiple logistic regression model to examine the association between SES and body pain. Overall, 65.34% reported body pain (male: 60.93%; female: 69.73%). After adjustments based on sex, age, education, area of residence, marital status, smoking, drinking and health status, the results showed that students (odds ratio [OR] = 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32–1.74) and professionals (OR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.08–1.37) had significant high risk for body pain, compared with civil servants and farmers (OR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.55–0.75) who significantly lower risk of body pain. The study demonstrates there is a significant negative association between education and reported body pain. The results indicated an association between SES and body pain within the Chinese community. Body pain varied among different Chinese occupation-related population and people with higher education level are less like to have body pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7220486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72204862020-06-15 The association between the socioeconomic status and body pain: A nationwide survey Yu, Tong Wei, Zhen Xu, Tan Gamber, Michelle Han, Jingnan Jiang, Yan Li, Jian Yang, Daihe Sun, Wenjie Medicine (Baltimore) 6600 Pain is a significant burden among different communities, but little is known regarding the epidemiology of pain, particularly with respect to socioeconomic status (SES). The aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence of body pain and to identify risk factors of pain in middle-aged and older Chinese. The data were extracted from the 2008 Chinese Suboptimal Health Study that consisted of 18,316 Chinese subjects aged 18 to 65 years. Information on SES including occupation and education levels and body pain were collected. A Likert scale was used to evaluate reported body pain. We used the multiple logistic regression model to examine the association between SES and body pain. Overall, 65.34% reported body pain (male: 60.93%; female: 69.73%). After adjustments based on sex, age, education, area of residence, marital status, smoking, drinking and health status, the results showed that students (odds ratio [OR] = 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32–1.74) and professionals (OR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.08–1.37) had significant high risk for body pain, compared with civil servants and farmers (OR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.55–0.75) who significantly lower risk of body pain. The study demonstrates there is a significant negative association between education and reported body pain. The results indicated an association between SES and body pain within the Chinese community. Body pain varied among different Chinese occupation-related population and people with higher education level are less like to have body pain. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7220486/ /pubmed/32195941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019454 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 6600
Yu, Tong
Wei, Zhen
Xu, Tan
Gamber, Michelle
Han, Jingnan
Jiang, Yan
Li, Jian
Yang, Daihe
Sun, Wenjie
The association between the socioeconomic status and body pain: A nationwide survey
title The association between the socioeconomic status and body pain: A nationwide survey
title_full The association between the socioeconomic status and body pain: A nationwide survey
title_fullStr The association between the socioeconomic status and body pain: A nationwide survey
title_full_unstemmed The association between the socioeconomic status and body pain: A nationwide survey
title_short The association between the socioeconomic status and body pain: A nationwide survey
title_sort association between the socioeconomic status and body pain: a nationwide survey
topic 6600
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32195941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019454
work_keys_str_mv AT yutong theassociationbetweenthesocioeconomicstatusandbodypainanationwidesurvey
AT weizhen theassociationbetweenthesocioeconomicstatusandbodypainanationwidesurvey
AT xutan theassociationbetweenthesocioeconomicstatusandbodypainanationwidesurvey
AT gambermichelle theassociationbetweenthesocioeconomicstatusandbodypainanationwidesurvey
AT hanjingnan theassociationbetweenthesocioeconomicstatusandbodypainanationwidesurvey
AT jiangyan theassociationbetweenthesocioeconomicstatusandbodypainanationwidesurvey
AT lijian theassociationbetweenthesocioeconomicstatusandbodypainanationwidesurvey
AT yangdaihe theassociationbetweenthesocioeconomicstatusandbodypainanationwidesurvey
AT sunwenjie theassociationbetweenthesocioeconomicstatusandbodypainanationwidesurvey
AT yutong associationbetweenthesocioeconomicstatusandbodypainanationwidesurvey
AT weizhen associationbetweenthesocioeconomicstatusandbodypainanationwidesurvey
AT xutan associationbetweenthesocioeconomicstatusandbodypainanationwidesurvey
AT gambermichelle associationbetweenthesocioeconomicstatusandbodypainanationwidesurvey
AT hanjingnan associationbetweenthesocioeconomicstatusandbodypainanationwidesurvey
AT jiangyan associationbetweenthesocioeconomicstatusandbodypainanationwidesurvey
AT lijian associationbetweenthesocioeconomicstatusandbodypainanationwidesurvey
AT yangdaihe associationbetweenthesocioeconomicstatusandbodypainanationwidesurvey
AT sunwenjie associationbetweenthesocioeconomicstatusandbodypainanationwidesurvey