Cargando…
Comparing hybrid problem-based and lecture learning (PBL + LBL) with LBL pedagogy on clinical curriculum learning for medical students in China: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: Problem-based learning (PBL) combined lecture based learning (LBL) has been a trend adopted as a new medical pedagogical approach in Chinese medical teaching. This study aims to evaluate the impacts of hybrid PBL and LBL pedagogy compared with LBL teaching method on the learning achievem...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32311943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019687 |
_version_ | 1783533182476353536 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Chun-Xiao Ouyang, Wei-Wei Wang, Xiao-Wen Chen, Dan Jiang, Zhao-Lei |
author_facet | Liu, Chun-Xiao Ouyang, Wei-Wei Wang, Xiao-Wen Chen, Dan Jiang, Zhao-Lei |
author_sort | Liu, Chun-Xiao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Problem-based learning (PBL) combined lecture based learning (LBL) has been a trend adopted as a new medical pedagogical approach in Chinese medical teaching. This study aims to evaluate the impacts of hybrid PBL and LBL pedagogy compared with LBL teaching method on the learning achievements of clinical curriculum for Chinese medicine students. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified through a systematic literature search of electronic databases and article references up to June 2019. PubMed, EBSCO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Wanfang Database, CNKI, and China Biology Medicine database (CBM) were searched. End points included knowledge scores, skill scores, medical writing scores, comprehensive ability scores and teaching satisfaction. RESULTS: Totally 20 randomized controlled studies were finally included and all Chinese literatures, involving 1817 patients. Compared with traditional LBL pedagogy, hybrid PBL and LBL pedagogy significantly increased the clinical theoretical knowledge assessment score (RR = 4.84, 95% CI: 2.92∼6.76, P < .00001), clinical skills assessment score (RR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.39∼1.81, P < .00001), comprehensive ability score (RR = 9.13, 95% CI: 8.42∼9.84, P < .00001) and teaching satisfaction (RR = 2.58, 95% CI: 1.84∼3.62, P < .00001), The meta-regression results showed that expertise-level of students and course type were the factors that caused heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid PBL and LBL pedagogy integrates the advantages of conventional teaching methods and novel teaching methods, remarkably improves the teaching efficacy, demonstrates easy acceptance by students, and meets the demand of modern medical education, so it is an effective approach to cultivate the medical talents with an ability of innovative thinking and can be advocated and popularized as a teaching means. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7220526 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72205262020-06-15 Comparing hybrid problem-based and lecture learning (PBL + LBL) with LBL pedagogy on clinical curriculum learning for medical students in China: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Liu, Chun-Xiao Ouyang, Wei-Wei Wang, Xiao-Wen Chen, Dan Jiang, Zhao-Lei Medicine (Baltimore) 5400 BACKGROUND: Problem-based learning (PBL) combined lecture based learning (LBL) has been a trend adopted as a new medical pedagogical approach in Chinese medical teaching. This study aims to evaluate the impacts of hybrid PBL and LBL pedagogy compared with LBL teaching method on the learning achievements of clinical curriculum for Chinese medicine students. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified through a systematic literature search of electronic databases and article references up to June 2019. PubMed, EBSCO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Wanfang Database, CNKI, and China Biology Medicine database (CBM) were searched. End points included knowledge scores, skill scores, medical writing scores, comprehensive ability scores and teaching satisfaction. RESULTS: Totally 20 randomized controlled studies were finally included and all Chinese literatures, involving 1817 patients. Compared with traditional LBL pedagogy, hybrid PBL and LBL pedagogy significantly increased the clinical theoretical knowledge assessment score (RR = 4.84, 95% CI: 2.92∼6.76, P < .00001), clinical skills assessment score (RR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.39∼1.81, P < .00001), comprehensive ability score (RR = 9.13, 95% CI: 8.42∼9.84, P < .00001) and teaching satisfaction (RR = 2.58, 95% CI: 1.84∼3.62, P < .00001), The meta-regression results showed that expertise-level of students and course type were the factors that caused heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid PBL and LBL pedagogy integrates the advantages of conventional teaching methods and novel teaching methods, remarkably improves the teaching efficacy, demonstrates easy acceptance by students, and meets the demand of modern medical education, so it is an effective approach to cultivate the medical talents with an ability of innovative thinking and can be advocated and popularized as a teaching means. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7220526/ /pubmed/32311943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019687 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5400 Liu, Chun-Xiao Ouyang, Wei-Wei Wang, Xiao-Wen Chen, Dan Jiang, Zhao-Lei Comparing hybrid problem-based and lecture learning (PBL + LBL) with LBL pedagogy on clinical curriculum learning for medical students in China: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | Comparing hybrid problem-based and lecture learning (PBL + LBL) with LBL pedagogy on clinical curriculum learning for medical students in China: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Comparing hybrid problem-based and lecture learning (PBL + LBL) with LBL pedagogy on clinical curriculum learning for medical students in China: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Comparing hybrid problem-based and lecture learning (PBL + LBL) with LBL pedagogy on clinical curriculum learning for medical students in China: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing hybrid problem-based and lecture learning (PBL + LBL) with LBL pedagogy on clinical curriculum learning for medical students in China: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Comparing hybrid problem-based and lecture learning (PBL + LBL) with LBL pedagogy on clinical curriculum learning for medical students in China: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | comparing hybrid problem-based and lecture learning (pbl + lbl) with lbl pedagogy on clinical curriculum learning for medical students in china: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | 5400 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32311943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019687 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuchunxiao comparinghybridproblembasedandlecturelearningpbllblwithlblpedagogyonclinicalcurriculumlearningformedicalstudentsinchinaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT ouyangweiwei comparinghybridproblembasedandlecturelearningpbllblwithlblpedagogyonclinicalcurriculumlearningformedicalstudentsinchinaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wangxiaowen comparinghybridproblembasedandlecturelearningpbllblwithlblpedagogyonclinicalcurriculumlearningformedicalstudentsinchinaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT chendan comparinghybridproblembasedandlecturelearningpbllblwithlblpedagogyonclinicalcurriculumlearningformedicalstudentsinchinaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT jiangzhaolei comparinghybridproblembasedandlecturelearningpbllblwithlblpedagogyonclinicalcurriculumlearningformedicalstudentsinchinaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |