Cargando…

The prognostic value of the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio in cancer: An updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) is correlated with the clinical outcomes of solid tumors. However, the available data have not been systematically evaluated. The objective of the present meta-analysis was to explore the prognostic val...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Xinhua, Jia, Zhiqiang, Chen, Dingchao, Xu, Chunwei, Yang, Peng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32243358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019165
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) is correlated with the clinical outcomes of solid tumors. However, the available data have not been systematically evaluated. The objective of the present meta-analysis was to explore the prognostic value of the CAR in solid tumors. METHODS: Eligible studies were identified from the PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science electronic databases. The clinical characteristics, disease -free survival (DFS) /progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were extracted from the eligible studies. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated with STATA 12.0 software. We also performed subgroup, meta-regression and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: In total, twenty-seven eligible studies including 10556 patients were enrolled in the present meta-analysis. The pooled HRs with 95% confidence intervals showed that the CAR was significantly associated with poor OS (HR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.71–2.22) and DFS/PFS (HR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.61–2.07) in patients with solid tumors. Although publication bias was found in the studies with regard to OS, a further trim and fill analysis revealed that the adjusted HR was 1.82 (95% CI: 1.69–1.96), which was close to the original HR. Subgroup analysis confirmed the CAR as a strong prognostic marker in patients with solid tumors, regardless of the tumor type, detection time, cut-off value, sample size and area. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis indicated that a high CAR might be an unfavorable prognostic marker for OS and DFS/PFS in patients with solid tumors.