Cargando…
Current methods for development of rapid reviews about diagnostic tests: an international survey
BACKGROUND: Rapid reviews (RRs) have emerged as an efficient alternative to time-consuming systematic reviews—they can help meet the demand for accelerated evidence synthesis to inform decision-making in healthcare. The synthesis of diagnostic evidence has important methodological challenges. Here,...
Autores principales: | Arevalo-Rodriguez, Ingrid, Steingart, Karen R., Tricco, Andrea C., Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara, Kaunelis, David, Alonso-Coello, Pablo, Baxter, Susan, Bossuyt, Patrick M., Emparanza, José Ignacio, Zamora, Javier |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32404051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01004-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
Challenges of rapid reviews for diagnostic test accuracy questions: a protocol for an international survey and expert consultation
por: Arevalo-Rodriguez, Ingrid, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Diagnostic tools for alzheimer’s disease dementia and other dementias: an overview of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) systematic reviews
por: Arevalo-Rodriguez, Ingrid, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews
por: King, Valerie J., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Barriers to making recommendations about medical tests: a qualitative study of European guideline developers
por: Gopalakrishna, Gowri, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Quality of clinical practice guidelines about red blood cell transfusion
por: Simancas‐Racines, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2018)