Cargando…
Comparison of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with the convex probe 6C1 and linear probe 9L4
BACKGROUND: Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) is a noninvasive method to detect liver fibrosis. The aims of the study were to evaluate the difference between 2 different probes, 6 C1 and 9 L4, and to study inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for the probes. METHODS: We enrolled 10...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32311951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019701 |
_version_ | 1783533222314901504 |
---|---|
author | Wegner, Mirja Iskender, Erol Azzarok, Ahmed Sagir, Abdurrahman |
author_facet | Wegner, Mirja Iskender, Erol Azzarok, Ahmed Sagir, Abdurrahman |
author_sort | Wegner, Mirja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) is a noninvasive method to detect liver fibrosis. The aims of the study were to evaluate the difference between 2 different probes, 6 C1 and 9 L4, and to study inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for the probes. METHODS: We enrolled 100 patients in this cross-sectional comparative study. All patients underwent liver stiffness measurement with both probes. Intraobserver, interobserver, intralobe, and interlobe agreement was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A significant difference in success rates was observed for both probes between the right and left liver lobes. A success rate of 91% was observed in the right liver lobe compared with 77% in the left liver for the convex probe (P = .007), and 91% vs 68% for the linear probe (P < .001). There was a significant correlation in ARFI-shear wave velocity (ARFI-SWV) between both probes in the right liver lobe (P = .01; r = .508) and in the left liver lobe (P = .05; r = .278); however, there was no significant correlation in ARFI-SWV between the liver lobes for both probes (convex probe r = .19 P = .112; linear probe r = .144 P = .23). Good or excellent inter- and intraobserver was detected for both probes. Poor agreement was found only for the interobserver agreement in the left lobe with the convex probe (ICC = .320). CONCLUSION: ARFI can be performed successfully with both probes in both liver lobes. There was no significant correlation in ARFI between the liver lobes for both probes; however, the right liver lobe should be favored. Standardization of the procedure is needed for the comparability of different studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7220701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72207012020-06-15 Comparison of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with the convex probe 6C1 and linear probe 9L4 Wegner, Mirja Iskender, Erol Azzarok, Ahmed Sagir, Abdurrahman Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 BACKGROUND: Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) is a noninvasive method to detect liver fibrosis. The aims of the study were to evaluate the difference between 2 different probes, 6 C1 and 9 L4, and to study inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for the probes. METHODS: We enrolled 100 patients in this cross-sectional comparative study. All patients underwent liver stiffness measurement with both probes. Intraobserver, interobserver, intralobe, and interlobe agreement was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A significant difference in success rates was observed for both probes between the right and left liver lobes. A success rate of 91% was observed in the right liver lobe compared with 77% in the left liver for the convex probe (P = .007), and 91% vs 68% for the linear probe (P < .001). There was a significant correlation in ARFI-shear wave velocity (ARFI-SWV) between both probes in the right liver lobe (P = .01; r = .508) and in the left liver lobe (P = .05; r = .278); however, there was no significant correlation in ARFI-SWV between the liver lobes for both probes (convex probe r = .19 P = .112; linear probe r = .144 P = .23). Good or excellent inter- and intraobserver was detected for both probes. Poor agreement was found only for the interobserver agreement in the left lobe with the convex probe (ICC = .320). CONCLUSION: ARFI can be performed successfully with both probes in both liver lobes. There was no significant correlation in ARFI between the liver lobes for both probes; however, the right liver lobe should be favored. Standardization of the procedure is needed for the comparability of different studies. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7220701/ /pubmed/32311951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019701 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 4500 Wegner, Mirja Iskender, Erol Azzarok, Ahmed Sagir, Abdurrahman Comparison of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with the convex probe 6C1 and linear probe 9L4 |
title | Comparison of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with the convex probe 6C1 and linear probe 9L4 |
title_full | Comparison of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with the convex probe 6C1 and linear probe 9L4 |
title_fullStr | Comparison of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with the convex probe 6C1 and linear probe 9L4 |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with the convex probe 6C1 and linear probe 9L4 |
title_short | Comparison of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with the convex probe 6C1 and linear probe 9L4 |
title_sort | comparison of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with the convex probe 6c1 and linear probe 9l4 |
topic | 4500 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32311951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019701 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wegnermirja comparisonofacousticradiationforceimpulseimagingwiththeconvexprobe6c1andlinearprobe9l4 AT iskendererol comparisonofacousticradiationforceimpulseimagingwiththeconvexprobe6c1andlinearprobe9l4 AT azzarokahmed comparisonofacousticradiationforceimpulseimagingwiththeconvexprobe6c1andlinearprobe9l4 AT sagirabdurrahman comparisonofacousticradiationforceimpulseimagingwiththeconvexprobe6c1andlinearprobe9l4 |