Cargando…

Comparison of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with the convex probe 6C1 and linear probe 9L4

BACKGROUND: Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) is a noninvasive method to detect liver fibrosis. The aims of the study were to evaluate the difference between 2 different probes, 6 C1 and 9 L4, and to study inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for the probes. METHODS: We enrolled 10...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wegner, Mirja, Iskender, Erol, Azzarok, Ahmed, Sagir, Abdurrahman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32311951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019701
_version_ 1783533222314901504
author Wegner, Mirja
Iskender, Erol
Azzarok, Ahmed
Sagir, Abdurrahman
author_facet Wegner, Mirja
Iskender, Erol
Azzarok, Ahmed
Sagir, Abdurrahman
author_sort Wegner, Mirja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) is a noninvasive method to detect liver fibrosis. The aims of the study were to evaluate the difference between 2 different probes, 6 C1 and 9 L4, and to study inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for the probes. METHODS: We enrolled 100 patients in this cross-sectional comparative study. All patients underwent liver stiffness measurement with both probes. Intraobserver, interobserver, intralobe, and interlobe agreement was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A significant difference in success rates was observed for both probes between the right and left liver lobes. A success rate of 91% was observed in the right liver lobe compared with 77% in the left liver for the convex probe (P = .007), and 91% vs 68% for the linear probe (P < .001). There was a significant correlation in ARFI-shear wave velocity (ARFI-SWV) between both probes in the right liver lobe (P = .01; r = .508) and in the left liver lobe (P = .05; r = .278); however, there was no significant correlation in ARFI-SWV between the liver lobes for both probes (convex probe r = .19 P = .112; linear probe r = .144 P = .23). Good or excellent inter- and intraobserver was detected for both probes. Poor agreement was found only for the interobserver agreement in the left lobe with the convex probe (ICC = .320). CONCLUSION: ARFI can be performed successfully with both probes in both liver lobes. There was no significant correlation in ARFI between the liver lobes for both probes; however, the right liver lobe should be favored. Standardization of the procedure is needed for the comparability of different studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7220701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72207012020-06-15 Comparison of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with the convex probe 6C1 and linear probe 9L4 Wegner, Mirja Iskender, Erol Azzarok, Ahmed Sagir, Abdurrahman Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 BACKGROUND: Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) is a noninvasive method to detect liver fibrosis. The aims of the study were to evaluate the difference between 2 different probes, 6 C1 and 9 L4, and to study inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for the probes. METHODS: We enrolled 100 patients in this cross-sectional comparative study. All patients underwent liver stiffness measurement with both probes. Intraobserver, interobserver, intralobe, and interlobe agreement was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A significant difference in success rates was observed for both probes between the right and left liver lobes. A success rate of 91% was observed in the right liver lobe compared with 77% in the left liver for the convex probe (P = .007), and 91% vs 68% for the linear probe (P < .001). There was a significant correlation in ARFI-shear wave velocity (ARFI-SWV) between both probes in the right liver lobe (P = .01; r = .508) and in the left liver lobe (P = .05; r = .278); however, there was no significant correlation in ARFI-SWV between the liver lobes for both probes (convex probe r = .19 P = .112; linear probe r = .144 P = .23). Good or excellent inter- and intraobserver was detected for both probes. Poor agreement was found only for the interobserver agreement in the left lobe with the convex probe (ICC = .320). CONCLUSION: ARFI can be performed successfully with both probes in both liver lobes. There was no significant correlation in ARFI between the liver lobes for both probes; however, the right liver lobe should be favored. Standardization of the procedure is needed for the comparability of different studies. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7220701/ /pubmed/32311951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019701 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 4500
Wegner, Mirja
Iskender, Erol
Azzarok, Ahmed
Sagir, Abdurrahman
Comparison of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with the convex probe 6C1 and linear probe 9L4
title Comparison of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with the convex probe 6C1 and linear probe 9L4
title_full Comparison of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with the convex probe 6C1 and linear probe 9L4
title_fullStr Comparison of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with the convex probe 6C1 and linear probe 9L4
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with the convex probe 6C1 and linear probe 9L4
title_short Comparison of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with the convex probe 6C1 and linear probe 9L4
title_sort comparison of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with the convex probe 6c1 and linear probe 9l4
topic 4500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32311951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019701
work_keys_str_mv AT wegnermirja comparisonofacousticradiationforceimpulseimagingwiththeconvexprobe6c1andlinearprobe9l4
AT iskendererol comparisonofacousticradiationforceimpulseimagingwiththeconvexprobe6c1andlinearprobe9l4
AT azzarokahmed comparisonofacousticradiationforceimpulseimagingwiththeconvexprobe6c1andlinearprobe9l4
AT sagirabdurrahman comparisonofacousticradiationforceimpulseimagingwiththeconvexprobe6c1andlinearprobe9l4