Cargando…

Comparison of two modified methods of intrathecal catheterization in rats

The study designed to compare two different methods of intrathecal catheterization in rats and to develop a simple and safe drug administration in cervical spinal canal of rats. The subarachnoid catheterization was performed via either atlanto-occipital membrane or laminectomy at L3–4 in rats. Body...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kong, Ganggang, Huang, Zhiping, Zhu, Qingan, Wan, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31866599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1538/expanim.19-0108
_version_ 1783533225152348160
author Kong, Ganggang
Huang, Zhiping
Zhu, Qingan
Wan, Yong
author_facet Kong, Ganggang
Huang, Zhiping
Zhu, Qingan
Wan, Yong
author_sort Kong, Ganggang
collection PubMed
description The study designed to compare two different methods of intrathecal catheterization in rats and to develop a simple and safe drug administration in cervical spinal canal of rats. The subarachnoid catheterization was performed via either atlanto-occipital membrane or laminectomy at L3–4 in rats. Body weight, Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) locomotion rating scores and forelimb locomotor rating scale (FLS) were measured on pre-operative day 1 and postoperative day 1, 7, 14, respectively. FLS score of 37.5% rats and BBB score of 50% rats in the atlanto-occipital approach (AOA) group decreased, but no rats showed locomotor impairment in the lumber approach (LA) group. The mean body weight of rats in AOA group reduced significantly compared with LA group. In LA group, 62.5% of catheter tips were located at T1, and in AOA group, the tips of catheter located at C2 in 62.5% cases. The PE10 catheter can be successfully inserted into the spinal intrathecal space for chronic delivery of drugs either via L3–L4 interlaminar space or via atlanto-occipital membrane. And the subarachnoid catheterization via L3–L4 interlaminar space could be easily placed at T1 with little complication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7220713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Japanese Association for Laboratory Animal Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72207132020-05-18 Comparison of two modified methods of intrathecal catheterization in rats Kong, Ganggang Huang, Zhiping Zhu, Qingan Wan, Yong Exp Anim Original The study designed to compare two different methods of intrathecal catheterization in rats and to develop a simple and safe drug administration in cervical spinal canal of rats. The subarachnoid catheterization was performed via either atlanto-occipital membrane or laminectomy at L3–4 in rats. Body weight, Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) locomotion rating scores and forelimb locomotor rating scale (FLS) were measured on pre-operative day 1 and postoperative day 1, 7, 14, respectively. FLS score of 37.5% rats and BBB score of 50% rats in the atlanto-occipital approach (AOA) group decreased, but no rats showed locomotor impairment in the lumber approach (LA) group. The mean body weight of rats in AOA group reduced significantly compared with LA group. In LA group, 62.5% of catheter tips were located at T1, and in AOA group, the tips of catheter located at C2 in 62.5% cases. The PE10 catheter can be successfully inserted into the spinal intrathecal space for chronic delivery of drugs either via L3–L4 interlaminar space or via atlanto-occipital membrane. And the subarachnoid catheterization via L3–L4 interlaminar space could be easily placed at T1 with little complication. Japanese Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2019-12-20 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7220713/ /pubmed/31866599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1538/expanim.19-0108 Text en ©2020 Japanese Association for Laboratory Animal Science This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original
Kong, Ganggang
Huang, Zhiping
Zhu, Qingan
Wan, Yong
Comparison of two modified methods of intrathecal catheterization in rats
title Comparison of two modified methods of intrathecal catheterization in rats
title_full Comparison of two modified methods of intrathecal catheterization in rats
title_fullStr Comparison of two modified methods of intrathecal catheterization in rats
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two modified methods of intrathecal catheterization in rats
title_short Comparison of two modified methods of intrathecal catheterization in rats
title_sort comparison of two modified methods of intrathecal catheterization in rats
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31866599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1538/expanim.19-0108
work_keys_str_mv AT kongganggang comparisonoftwomodifiedmethodsofintrathecalcatheterizationinrats
AT huangzhiping comparisonoftwomodifiedmethodsofintrathecalcatheterizationinrats
AT zhuqingan comparisonoftwomodifiedmethodsofintrathecalcatheterizationinrats
AT wanyong comparisonoftwomodifiedmethodsofintrathecalcatheterizationinrats