Cargando…
Arthroscopic labral debridement versus labral repair for patients with femoroacetabular impingement: A meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common cause of hip pain and even tearing of the acetabular labrum in young adults and athletes. Either arthroscopic labral debridement (LD) or labral repair (LR) technique for FAI patients is needed to choose. We conducted this systematic review an...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32384496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020141 |
_version_ | 1783533232775495680 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Zhan-Xiong Ren, Wen-Xia Ren, Yi-Ming Tian, Meng-Qiang |
author_facet | Wu, Zhan-Xiong Ren, Wen-Xia Ren, Yi-Ming Tian, Meng-Qiang |
author_sort | Wu, Zhan-Xiong |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common cause of hip pain and even tearing of the acetabular labrum in young adults and athletes. Either arthroscopic labral debridement (LD) or labral repair (LR) technique for FAI patients is needed to choose. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic LD versus LR intervention. METHODS: The five studies were acquired from PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The data were extracted by two of the coauthors independently and were analyzed by RevMan5.3. Mean differences (MDs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool and Newcastle–Ottawa Scale were used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS: Four observational studies and one prospective randomized study were assessed. The methodological quality of the trials indicated a low to moderate risk of bias. The pooled results of Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), failure rate of surgeries and complications showed that the differences were not statistically significant between the two interventions. The difference of modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and satisfaction rate was statistically significant between LD and LR intervention, and LR treatment was more effective. Sensitivity analysis proved the stability of the pooled results and there were too less included articles to verify the publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Hip arthroscopy with either LR or LD is an effective treatment for symptomatic FAI. The difference of mHHS, VAS score, and satisfaction rate was statistically significant between LD and LR intervention, and arthroscopic LR could re-create suction-seal effect, potentially reduce microinstability, which demonstrated a trend toward better clinical efficacy and comparable safety compared with LD. The arthroscopic LR technique is recommended as the optical choice for acetabular labrum tear with FAI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7220745 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72207452020-06-15 Arthroscopic labral debridement versus labral repair for patients with femoroacetabular impingement: A meta-analysis Wu, Zhan-Xiong Ren, Wen-Xia Ren, Yi-Ming Tian, Meng-Qiang Medicine (Baltimore) 7000 OBJECTIVE: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common cause of hip pain and even tearing of the acetabular labrum in young adults and athletes. Either arthroscopic labral debridement (LD) or labral repair (LR) technique for FAI patients is needed to choose. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic LD versus LR intervention. METHODS: The five studies were acquired from PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The data were extracted by two of the coauthors independently and were analyzed by RevMan5.3. Mean differences (MDs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool and Newcastle–Ottawa Scale were used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS: Four observational studies and one prospective randomized study were assessed. The methodological quality of the trials indicated a low to moderate risk of bias. The pooled results of Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), failure rate of surgeries and complications showed that the differences were not statistically significant between the two interventions. The difference of modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and satisfaction rate was statistically significant between LD and LR intervention, and LR treatment was more effective. Sensitivity analysis proved the stability of the pooled results and there were too less included articles to verify the publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Hip arthroscopy with either LR or LD is an effective treatment for symptomatic FAI. The difference of mHHS, VAS score, and satisfaction rate was statistically significant between LD and LR intervention, and arthroscopic LR could re-create suction-seal effect, potentially reduce microinstability, which demonstrated a trend toward better clinical efficacy and comparable safety compared with LD. The arthroscopic LR technique is recommended as the optical choice for acetabular labrum tear with FAI. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7220745/ /pubmed/32384496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020141 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 7000 Wu, Zhan-Xiong Ren, Wen-Xia Ren, Yi-Ming Tian, Meng-Qiang Arthroscopic labral debridement versus labral repair for patients with femoroacetabular impingement: A meta-analysis |
title | Arthroscopic labral debridement versus labral repair for patients with femoroacetabular impingement: A meta-analysis |
title_full | Arthroscopic labral debridement versus labral repair for patients with femoroacetabular impingement: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Arthroscopic labral debridement versus labral repair for patients with femoroacetabular impingement: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Arthroscopic labral debridement versus labral repair for patients with femoroacetabular impingement: A meta-analysis |
title_short | Arthroscopic labral debridement versus labral repair for patients with femoroacetabular impingement: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | arthroscopic labral debridement versus labral repair for patients with femoroacetabular impingement: a meta-analysis |
topic | 7000 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32384496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuzhanxiong arthroscopiclabraldebridementversuslabralrepairforpatientswithfemoroacetabularimpingementametaanalysis AT renwenxia arthroscopiclabraldebridementversuslabralrepairforpatientswithfemoroacetabularimpingementametaanalysis AT renyiming arthroscopiclabraldebridementversuslabralrepairforpatientswithfemoroacetabularimpingementametaanalysis AT tianmengqiang arthroscopiclabraldebridementversuslabralrepairforpatientswithfemoroacetabularimpingementametaanalysis |