Cargando…

Arthroscopic labral debridement versus labral repair for patients with femoroacetabular impingement: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common cause of hip pain and even tearing of the acetabular labrum in young adults and athletes. Either arthroscopic labral debridement (LD) or labral repair (LR) technique for FAI patients is needed to choose. We conducted this systematic review an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Zhan-Xiong, Ren, Wen-Xia, Ren, Yi-Ming, Tian, Meng-Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32384496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020141
_version_ 1783533232775495680
author Wu, Zhan-Xiong
Ren, Wen-Xia
Ren, Yi-Ming
Tian, Meng-Qiang
author_facet Wu, Zhan-Xiong
Ren, Wen-Xia
Ren, Yi-Ming
Tian, Meng-Qiang
author_sort Wu, Zhan-Xiong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common cause of hip pain and even tearing of the acetabular labrum in young adults and athletes. Either arthroscopic labral debridement (LD) or labral repair (LR) technique for FAI patients is needed to choose. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic LD versus LR intervention. METHODS: The five studies were acquired from PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The data were extracted by two of the coauthors independently and were analyzed by RevMan5.3. Mean differences (MDs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool and Newcastle–Ottawa Scale were used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS: Four observational studies and one prospective randomized study were assessed. The methodological quality of the trials indicated a low to moderate risk of bias. The pooled results of Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), failure rate of surgeries and complications showed that the differences were not statistically significant between the two interventions. The difference of modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and satisfaction rate was statistically significant between LD and LR intervention, and LR treatment was more effective. Sensitivity analysis proved the stability of the pooled results and there were too less included articles to verify the publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Hip arthroscopy with either LR or LD is an effective treatment for symptomatic FAI. The difference of mHHS, VAS score, and satisfaction rate was statistically significant between LD and LR intervention, and arthroscopic LR could re-create suction-seal effect, potentially reduce microinstability, which demonstrated a trend toward better clinical efficacy and comparable safety compared with LD. The arthroscopic LR technique is recommended as the optical choice for acetabular labrum tear with FAI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7220745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72207452020-06-15 Arthroscopic labral debridement versus labral repair for patients with femoroacetabular impingement: A meta-analysis Wu, Zhan-Xiong Ren, Wen-Xia Ren, Yi-Ming Tian, Meng-Qiang Medicine (Baltimore) 7000 OBJECTIVE: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common cause of hip pain and even tearing of the acetabular labrum in young adults and athletes. Either arthroscopic labral debridement (LD) or labral repair (LR) technique for FAI patients is needed to choose. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic LD versus LR intervention. METHODS: The five studies were acquired from PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The data were extracted by two of the coauthors independently and were analyzed by RevMan5.3. Mean differences (MDs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool and Newcastle–Ottawa Scale were used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS: Four observational studies and one prospective randomized study were assessed. The methodological quality of the trials indicated a low to moderate risk of bias. The pooled results of Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), failure rate of surgeries and complications showed that the differences were not statistically significant between the two interventions. The difference of modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and satisfaction rate was statistically significant between LD and LR intervention, and LR treatment was more effective. Sensitivity analysis proved the stability of the pooled results and there were too less included articles to verify the publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Hip arthroscopy with either LR or LD is an effective treatment for symptomatic FAI. The difference of mHHS, VAS score, and satisfaction rate was statistically significant between LD and LR intervention, and arthroscopic LR could re-create suction-seal effect, potentially reduce microinstability, which demonstrated a trend toward better clinical efficacy and comparable safety compared with LD. The arthroscopic LR technique is recommended as the optical choice for acetabular labrum tear with FAI. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7220745/ /pubmed/32384496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020141 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7000
Wu, Zhan-Xiong
Ren, Wen-Xia
Ren, Yi-Ming
Tian, Meng-Qiang
Arthroscopic labral debridement versus labral repair for patients with femoroacetabular impingement: A meta-analysis
title Arthroscopic labral debridement versus labral repair for patients with femoroacetabular impingement: A meta-analysis
title_full Arthroscopic labral debridement versus labral repair for patients with femoroacetabular impingement: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Arthroscopic labral debridement versus labral repair for patients with femoroacetabular impingement: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Arthroscopic labral debridement versus labral repair for patients with femoroacetabular impingement: A meta-analysis
title_short Arthroscopic labral debridement versus labral repair for patients with femoroacetabular impingement: A meta-analysis
title_sort arthroscopic labral debridement versus labral repair for patients with femoroacetabular impingement: a meta-analysis
topic 7000
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32384496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020141
work_keys_str_mv AT wuzhanxiong arthroscopiclabraldebridementversuslabralrepairforpatientswithfemoroacetabularimpingementametaanalysis
AT renwenxia arthroscopiclabraldebridementversuslabralrepairforpatientswithfemoroacetabularimpingementametaanalysis
AT renyiming arthroscopiclabraldebridementversuslabralrepairforpatientswithfemoroacetabularimpingementametaanalysis
AT tianmengqiang arthroscopiclabraldebridementversuslabralrepairforpatientswithfemoroacetabularimpingementametaanalysis