Cargando…

Evaluation of lipid quantification accuracy using HILIC and RPLC MS on the example of NIST® SRM® 1950 metabolites in human plasma

Lipidomics analysis for large-scale studies aiming at the identification and quantification of natural lipidomes is often performed using LC–MS-based data acquisition. However, the choice of suitable LC–MS method for accurate lipid quantification remains a matter of debate. Here, we performed the sy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lange, Mike, Fedorova, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32240327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02576-x
_version_ 1783533254766231552
author Lange, Mike
Fedorova, Maria
author_facet Lange, Mike
Fedorova, Maria
author_sort Lange, Mike
collection PubMed
description Lipidomics analysis for large-scale studies aiming at the identification and quantification of natural lipidomes is often performed using LC–MS-based data acquisition. However, the choice of suitable LC–MS method for accurate lipid quantification remains a matter of debate. Here, we performed the systematic comparison between two HRAM-MS-based quantification workflows based on HILIC and RPLC MS by quantifying 191 lipids from five lipid classes in human blood plasma using deuterated standards in the “one ISTD-per-lipid class” approach. Lipid quantification was performed considering all necessary isotopic corrections, and obtained correction factors are illustrated. Concentrations of lipids in NIST® SRM® 1950 human blood plasma determined by the two methods were comparable for most of the studied lipid species except for highly unsaturated phosphatidylcholines (PC). A comparison of lipid concentrations to consensus values determined in a previously published multi-laboratory study illustrated possible “overestimation” of concentrations for these highly unsaturated lipids by HILIC MS. We evaluated the influence of lipid loading amounts as well as the difference between quantified lipid and internal standard concentrations on the HILIC MS quantification results. We conclude that both HILIC and RPLC HRAM-MS workflows can be equally used for accurate lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), lysophosphatidylethanolamine (LPE), phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and sphingomyelin (SM) lipid quantification, despite significant differences in the concentration of highly unsaturated PC lipids which need to be addressed by establishing response factors to account for the differences in degree of lipid unsaturation. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00216-020-02576-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7220885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72208852020-05-14 Evaluation of lipid quantification accuracy using HILIC and RPLC MS on the example of NIST® SRM® 1950 metabolites in human plasma Lange, Mike Fedorova, Maria Anal Bioanal Chem Research Paper Lipidomics analysis for large-scale studies aiming at the identification and quantification of natural lipidomes is often performed using LC–MS-based data acquisition. However, the choice of suitable LC–MS method for accurate lipid quantification remains a matter of debate. Here, we performed the systematic comparison between two HRAM-MS-based quantification workflows based on HILIC and RPLC MS by quantifying 191 lipids from five lipid classes in human blood plasma using deuterated standards in the “one ISTD-per-lipid class” approach. Lipid quantification was performed considering all necessary isotopic corrections, and obtained correction factors are illustrated. Concentrations of lipids in NIST® SRM® 1950 human blood plasma determined by the two methods were comparable for most of the studied lipid species except for highly unsaturated phosphatidylcholines (PC). A comparison of lipid concentrations to consensus values determined in a previously published multi-laboratory study illustrated possible “overestimation” of concentrations for these highly unsaturated lipids by HILIC MS. We evaluated the influence of lipid loading amounts as well as the difference between quantified lipid and internal standard concentrations on the HILIC MS quantification results. We conclude that both HILIC and RPLC HRAM-MS workflows can be equally used for accurate lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), lysophosphatidylethanolamine (LPE), phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and sphingomyelin (SM) lipid quantification, despite significant differences in the concentration of highly unsaturated PC lipids which need to be addressed by establishing response factors to account for the differences in degree of lipid unsaturation. [Figure: see text] ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00216-020-02576-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-04-02 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7220885/ /pubmed/32240327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02576-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Lange, Mike
Fedorova, Maria
Evaluation of lipid quantification accuracy using HILIC and RPLC MS on the example of NIST® SRM® 1950 metabolites in human plasma
title Evaluation of lipid quantification accuracy using HILIC and RPLC MS on the example of NIST® SRM® 1950 metabolites in human plasma
title_full Evaluation of lipid quantification accuracy using HILIC and RPLC MS on the example of NIST® SRM® 1950 metabolites in human plasma
title_fullStr Evaluation of lipid quantification accuracy using HILIC and RPLC MS on the example of NIST® SRM® 1950 metabolites in human plasma
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of lipid quantification accuracy using HILIC and RPLC MS on the example of NIST® SRM® 1950 metabolites in human plasma
title_short Evaluation of lipid quantification accuracy using HILIC and RPLC MS on the example of NIST® SRM® 1950 metabolites in human plasma
title_sort evaluation of lipid quantification accuracy using hilic and rplc ms on the example of nist® srm® 1950 metabolites in human plasma
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7220885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32240327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02576-x
work_keys_str_mv AT langemike evaluationoflipidquantificationaccuracyusinghilicandrplcmsontheexampleofnistsrm1950metabolitesinhumanplasma
AT fedorovamaria evaluationoflipidquantificationaccuracyusinghilicandrplcmsontheexampleofnistsrm1950metabolitesinhumanplasma