Cargando…

The Healthcare Professionals’ Perspective on Impact and Actions Taken Following Severe Infusion Reaction Events in Oncology Centers in Europe

PURPOSE: The study aim was to describe the management strategies used for severe infusion-related reactions (SIRs) and understand the impact of such events in oncology day hospitals in France, Germany, Spain, and the UK. METHODS: The study was based on qualitative telephone interviews and quantitati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kafatos, George, Dube, Sabada, Burdon, Peter, Lowe, Kimberly, Leclerc, Marjorie, Flinois, Alain, Demonty, Gaston
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7221054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32170663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-020-00185-9
_version_ 1783533288268234752
author Kafatos, George
Dube, Sabada
Burdon, Peter
Lowe, Kimberly
Leclerc, Marjorie
Flinois, Alain
Demonty, Gaston
author_facet Kafatos, George
Dube, Sabada
Burdon, Peter
Lowe, Kimberly
Leclerc, Marjorie
Flinois, Alain
Demonty, Gaston
author_sort Kafatos, George
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The study aim was to describe the management strategies used for severe infusion-related reactions (SIRs) and understand the impact of such events in oncology day hospitals in France, Germany, Spain, and the UK. METHODS: The study was based on qualitative telephone interviews and quantitative self-completion questionnaires and asked healthcare professionals about the impact of SIRs and consequent actions taken. RESULTS: The procedures to prevent and manage SIRs were similar across countries and settings. In all countries, they were part of a larger risk-assessment and adverse events-prevention process. Preventive measures included patient history, risk assessment, pre-medication, and close monitoring of high-risk patients. The management procedures comprised stopping the infusion, triggering of the emergency chain, administering corticosteroids ± antihistamines, and hospitalization if necessary. The recalled SIRs had important consequences to affected patients, healthcare providers, and hospital organizational plans. All affected patients needed to be monitored closely for a prolonged time, thus blocking hospital beds. 44% of patients needed to be hospitalized, 17% needed resuscitation, and one patient died of cardiac arrest immediately after the start of the infusion. Importantly, 82% of patients were not re-challenged with the presumedly SIR-causing regimen or re-challenged in a later line. CONCLUSION: SIRs are unpredictable in nature, may have an extremely rapid onset, and are potentially fatal. Such events have a profound impact on the affected and surrounding patients, the care team and the organizational plan of the day-hospitals. Specific tools to reliably identify high-risk patients and predict the occurrence of events are needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40801-020-00185-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7221054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72210542020-05-15 The Healthcare Professionals’ Perspective on Impact and Actions Taken Following Severe Infusion Reaction Events in Oncology Centers in Europe Kafatos, George Dube, Sabada Burdon, Peter Lowe, Kimberly Leclerc, Marjorie Flinois, Alain Demonty, Gaston Drugs Real World Outcomes Original Research Article PURPOSE: The study aim was to describe the management strategies used for severe infusion-related reactions (SIRs) and understand the impact of such events in oncology day hospitals in France, Germany, Spain, and the UK. METHODS: The study was based on qualitative telephone interviews and quantitative self-completion questionnaires and asked healthcare professionals about the impact of SIRs and consequent actions taken. RESULTS: The procedures to prevent and manage SIRs were similar across countries and settings. In all countries, they were part of a larger risk-assessment and adverse events-prevention process. Preventive measures included patient history, risk assessment, pre-medication, and close monitoring of high-risk patients. The management procedures comprised stopping the infusion, triggering of the emergency chain, administering corticosteroids ± antihistamines, and hospitalization if necessary. The recalled SIRs had important consequences to affected patients, healthcare providers, and hospital organizational plans. All affected patients needed to be monitored closely for a prolonged time, thus blocking hospital beds. 44% of patients needed to be hospitalized, 17% needed resuscitation, and one patient died of cardiac arrest immediately after the start of the infusion. Importantly, 82% of patients were not re-challenged with the presumedly SIR-causing regimen or re-challenged in a later line. CONCLUSION: SIRs are unpredictable in nature, may have an extremely rapid onset, and are potentially fatal. Such events have a profound impact on the affected and surrounding patients, the care team and the organizational plan of the day-hospitals. Specific tools to reliably identify high-risk patients and predict the occurrence of events are needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40801-020-00185-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7221054/ /pubmed/32170663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-020-00185-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Kafatos, George
Dube, Sabada
Burdon, Peter
Lowe, Kimberly
Leclerc, Marjorie
Flinois, Alain
Demonty, Gaston
The Healthcare Professionals’ Perspective on Impact and Actions Taken Following Severe Infusion Reaction Events in Oncology Centers in Europe
title The Healthcare Professionals’ Perspective on Impact and Actions Taken Following Severe Infusion Reaction Events in Oncology Centers in Europe
title_full The Healthcare Professionals’ Perspective on Impact and Actions Taken Following Severe Infusion Reaction Events in Oncology Centers in Europe
title_fullStr The Healthcare Professionals’ Perspective on Impact and Actions Taken Following Severe Infusion Reaction Events in Oncology Centers in Europe
title_full_unstemmed The Healthcare Professionals’ Perspective on Impact and Actions Taken Following Severe Infusion Reaction Events in Oncology Centers in Europe
title_short The Healthcare Professionals’ Perspective on Impact and Actions Taken Following Severe Infusion Reaction Events in Oncology Centers in Europe
title_sort healthcare professionals’ perspective on impact and actions taken following severe infusion reaction events in oncology centers in europe
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7221054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32170663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-020-00185-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kafatosgeorge thehealthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope
AT dubesabada thehealthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope
AT burdonpeter thehealthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope
AT lowekimberly thehealthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope
AT leclercmarjorie thehealthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope
AT flinoisalain thehealthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope
AT demontygaston thehealthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope
AT kafatosgeorge healthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope
AT dubesabada healthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope
AT burdonpeter healthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope
AT lowekimberly healthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope
AT leclercmarjorie healthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope
AT flinoisalain healthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope
AT demontygaston healthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope