Cargando…
The Healthcare Professionals’ Perspective on Impact and Actions Taken Following Severe Infusion Reaction Events in Oncology Centers in Europe
PURPOSE: The study aim was to describe the management strategies used for severe infusion-related reactions (SIRs) and understand the impact of such events in oncology day hospitals in France, Germany, Spain, and the UK. METHODS: The study was based on qualitative telephone interviews and quantitati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7221054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32170663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-020-00185-9 |
_version_ | 1783533288268234752 |
---|---|
author | Kafatos, George Dube, Sabada Burdon, Peter Lowe, Kimberly Leclerc, Marjorie Flinois, Alain Demonty, Gaston |
author_facet | Kafatos, George Dube, Sabada Burdon, Peter Lowe, Kimberly Leclerc, Marjorie Flinois, Alain Demonty, Gaston |
author_sort | Kafatos, George |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The study aim was to describe the management strategies used for severe infusion-related reactions (SIRs) and understand the impact of such events in oncology day hospitals in France, Germany, Spain, and the UK. METHODS: The study was based on qualitative telephone interviews and quantitative self-completion questionnaires and asked healthcare professionals about the impact of SIRs and consequent actions taken. RESULTS: The procedures to prevent and manage SIRs were similar across countries and settings. In all countries, they were part of a larger risk-assessment and adverse events-prevention process. Preventive measures included patient history, risk assessment, pre-medication, and close monitoring of high-risk patients. The management procedures comprised stopping the infusion, triggering of the emergency chain, administering corticosteroids ± antihistamines, and hospitalization if necessary. The recalled SIRs had important consequences to affected patients, healthcare providers, and hospital organizational plans. All affected patients needed to be monitored closely for a prolonged time, thus blocking hospital beds. 44% of patients needed to be hospitalized, 17% needed resuscitation, and one patient died of cardiac arrest immediately after the start of the infusion. Importantly, 82% of patients were not re-challenged with the presumedly SIR-causing regimen or re-challenged in a later line. CONCLUSION: SIRs are unpredictable in nature, may have an extremely rapid onset, and are potentially fatal. Such events have a profound impact on the affected and surrounding patients, the care team and the organizational plan of the day-hospitals. Specific tools to reliably identify high-risk patients and predict the occurrence of events are needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40801-020-00185-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7221054 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72210542020-05-15 The Healthcare Professionals’ Perspective on Impact and Actions Taken Following Severe Infusion Reaction Events in Oncology Centers in Europe Kafatos, George Dube, Sabada Burdon, Peter Lowe, Kimberly Leclerc, Marjorie Flinois, Alain Demonty, Gaston Drugs Real World Outcomes Original Research Article PURPOSE: The study aim was to describe the management strategies used for severe infusion-related reactions (SIRs) and understand the impact of such events in oncology day hospitals in France, Germany, Spain, and the UK. METHODS: The study was based on qualitative telephone interviews and quantitative self-completion questionnaires and asked healthcare professionals about the impact of SIRs and consequent actions taken. RESULTS: The procedures to prevent and manage SIRs were similar across countries and settings. In all countries, they were part of a larger risk-assessment and adverse events-prevention process. Preventive measures included patient history, risk assessment, pre-medication, and close monitoring of high-risk patients. The management procedures comprised stopping the infusion, triggering of the emergency chain, administering corticosteroids ± antihistamines, and hospitalization if necessary. The recalled SIRs had important consequences to affected patients, healthcare providers, and hospital organizational plans. All affected patients needed to be monitored closely for a prolonged time, thus blocking hospital beds. 44% of patients needed to be hospitalized, 17% needed resuscitation, and one patient died of cardiac arrest immediately after the start of the infusion. Importantly, 82% of patients were not re-challenged with the presumedly SIR-causing regimen or re-challenged in a later line. CONCLUSION: SIRs are unpredictable in nature, may have an extremely rapid onset, and are potentially fatal. Such events have a profound impact on the affected and surrounding patients, the care team and the organizational plan of the day-hospitals. Specific tools to reliably identify high-risk patients and predict the occurrence of events are needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40801-020-00185-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7221054/ /pubmed/32170663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-020-00185-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Kafatos, George Dube, Sabada Burdon, Peter Lowe, Kimberly Leclerc, Marjorie Flinois, Alain Demonty, Gaston The Healthcare Professionals’ Perspective on Impact and Actions Taken Following Severe Infusion Reaction Events in Oncology Centers in Europe |
title | The Healthcare Professionals’ Perspective on Impact and Actions Taken Following Severe Infusion Reaction Events in Oncology Centers in Europe |
title_full | The Healthcare Professionals’ Perspective on Impact and Actions Taken Following Severe Infusion Reaction Events in Oncology Centers in Europe |
title_fullStr | The Healthcare Professionals’ Perspective on Impact and Actions Taken Following Severe Infusion Reaction Events in Oncology Centers in Europe |
title_full_unstemmed | The Healthcare Professionals’ Perspective on Impact and Actions Taken Following Severe Infusion Reaction Events in Oncology Centers in Europe |
title_short | The Healthcare Professionals’ Perspective on Impact and Actions Taken Following Severe Infusion Reaction Events in Oncology Centers in Europe |
title_sort | healthcare professionals’ perspective on impact and actions taken following severe infusion reaction events in oncology centers in europe |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7221054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32170663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40801-020-00185-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kafatosgeorge thehealthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope AT dubesabada thehealthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope AT burdonpeter thehealthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope AT lowekimberly thehealthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope AT leclercmarjorie thehealthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope AT flinoisalain thehealthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope AT demontygaston thehealthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope AT kafatosgeorge healthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope AT dubesabada healthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope AT burdonpeter healthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope AT lowekimberly healthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope AT leclercmarjorie healthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope AT flinoisalain healthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope AT demontygaston healthcareprofessionalsperspectiveonimpactandactionstakenfollowingsevereinfusionreactioneventsinoncologycentersineurope |