Cargando…

The day‐to‐day stability of the ruminal and fecal microbiota in lactating dairy cows

In this study, we examined differences between the microbiota of the ruminal fluid (DR) and feces (DF) from five lactating dairy cows over three consecutive days using 16S rRNA gene sequence‐based analysis. Results showed significant differences between the microbial communities of the DR and DF. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Shuai, Ji, Shoukun, Yan, Hui, Hao, Yangyi, Zhang, Jun, Wang, Yajing, Cao, Zhijun, Li, Shengli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7221419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32175695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.990
_version_ 1783533361453596672
author Huang, Shuai
Ji, Shoukun
Yan, Hui
Hao, Yangyi
Zhang, Jun
Wang, Yajing
Cao, Zhijun
Li, Shengli
author_facet Huang, Shuai
Ji, Shoukun
Yan, Hui
Hao, Yangyi
Zhang, Jun
Wang, Yajing
Cao, Zhijun
Li, Shengli
author_sort Huang, Shuai
collection PubMed
description In this study, we examined differences between the microbiota of the ruminal fluid (DR) and feces (DF) from five lactating dairy cows over three consecutive days using 16S rRNA gene sequence‐based analysis. Results showed significant differences between the microbial communities of the DR and DF. In particular, the relative abundance of the phyla Firmicutes and Actinobacteria was significantly lower (q < 0.001) in DR compared with DF, while the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes was significantly higher in DF than that of DR (q < 0.001). A significantly higher relative abundance of the genera Bifidobacterium, 5‐7N15, Clostridium, Epulopiscium, SMB53, Turicibacter, Dorea, Roseburia, and Akkermansia was observed in the DF, while a higher relative abundance of the genera Prevotella, Butyrivibrio, CF231, RFN20, and Succiniclasticum was observed in the DR. A further analysis using the functional prediction program PICRUSt showed that sequences belonging to the 5‐7N15, Akkermansia, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, Dorea, Epulopiscium, Roseburia, and Turicibacter were significantly and positively correlated with glycan biosynthesis and metabolism, while CF231, Prevotella, RFN20, and Succiniclasticum were significantly and positively correlated with amino acid, lipid, carbohydrate, other amino acid, cofactors, and vitamins metabolism. No significant differences were observed across the three consecutive days in either the DR or DF ecosystems, with no significant differences in the diversity or abundance at the phylum and genus levels suggested that there is a limited day‐to‐day variability in the gut microbiota.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7221419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72214192020-05-15 The day‐to‐day stability of the ruminal and fecal microbiota in lactating dairy cows Huang, Shuai Ji, Shoukun Yan, Hui Hao, Yangyi Zhang, Jun Wang, Yajing Cao, Zhijun Li, Shengli Microbiologyopen Original Articles In this study, we examined differences between the microbiota of the ruminal fluid (DR) and feces (DF) from five lactating dairy cows over three consecutive days using 16S rRNA gene sequence‐based analysis. Results showed significant differences between the microbial communities of the DR and DF. In particular, the relative abundance of the phyla Firmicutes and Actinobacteria was significantly lower (q < 0.001) in DR compared with DF, while the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes was significantly higher in DF than that of DR (q < 0.001). A significantly higher relative abundance of the genera Bifidobacterium, 5‐7N15, Clostridium, Epulopiscium, SMB53, Turicibacter, Dorea, Roseburia, and Akkermansia was observed in the DF, while a higher relative abundance of the genera Prevotella, Butyrivibrio, CF231, RFN20, and Succiniclasticum was observed in the DR. A further analysis using the functional prediction program PICRUSt showed that sequences belonging to the 5‐7N15, Akkermansia, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, Dorea, Epulopiscium, Roseburia, and Turicibacter were significantly and positively correlated with glycan biosynthesis and metabolism, while CF231, Prevotella, RFN20, and Succiniclasticum were significantly and positively correlated with amino acid, lipid, carbohydrate, other amino acid, cofactors, and vitamins metabolism. No significant differences were observed across the three consecutive days in either the DR or DF ecosystems, with no significant differences in the diversity or abundance at the phylum and genus levels suggested that there is a limited day‐to‐day variability in the gut microbiota. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7221419/ /pubmed/32175695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.990 Text en © 2020 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Huang, Shuai
Ji, Shoukun
Yan, Hui
Hao, Yangyi
Zhang, Jun
Wang, Yajing
Cao, Zhijun
Li, Shengli
The day‐to‐day stability of the ruminal and fecal microbiota in lactating dairy cows
title The day‐to‐day stability of the ruminal and fecal microbiota in lactating dairy cows
title_full The day‐to‐day stability of the ruminal and fecal microbiota in lactating dairy cows
title_fullStr The day‐to‐day stability of the ruminal and fecal microbiota in lactating dairy cows
title_full_unstemmed The day‐to‐day stability of the ruminal and fecal microbiota in lactating dairy cows
title_short The day‐to‐day stability of the ruminal and fecal microbiota in lactating dairy cows
title_sort day‐to‐day stability of the ruminal and fecal microbiota in lactating dairy cows
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7221419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32175695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.990
work_keys_str_mv AT huangshuai thedaytodaystabilityoftheruminalandfecalmicrobiotainlactatingdairycows
AT jishoukun thedaytodaystabilityoftheruminalandfecalmicrobiotainlactatingdairycows
AT yanhui thedaytodaystabilityoftheruminalandfecalmicrobiotainlactatingdairycows
AT haoyangyi thedaytodaystabilityoftheruminalandfecalmicrobiotainlactatingdairycows
AT zhangjun thedaytodaystabilityoftheruminalandfecalmicrobiotainlactatingdairycows
AT wangyajing thedaytodaystabilityoftheruminalandfecalmicrobiotainlactatingdairycows
AT caozhijun thedaytodaystabilityoftheruminalandfecalmicrobiotainlactatingdairycows
AT lishengli thedaytodaystabilityoftheruminalandfecalmicrobiotainlactatingdairycows
AT huangshuai daytodaystabilityoftheruminalandfecalmicrobiotainlactatingdairycows
AT jishoukun daytodaystabilityoftheruminalandfecalmicrobiotainlactatingdairycows
AT yanhui daytodaystabilityoftheruminalandfecalmicrobiotainlactatingdairycows
AT haoyangyi daytodaystabilityoftheruminalandfecalmicrobiotainlactatingdairycows
AT zhangjun daytodaystabilityoftheruminalandfecalmicrobiotainlactatingdairycows
AT wangyajing daytodaystabilityoftheruminalandfecalmicrobiotainlactatingdairycows
AT caozhijun daytodaystabilityoftheruminalandfecalmicrobiotainlactatingdairycows
AT lishengli daytodaystabilityoftheruminalandfecalmicrobiotainlactatingdairycows