Cargando…

Enhancement of Thermal Boundary Conductance of Metal–Polymer System

In organic electronics, thermal management is a challenge, as most organic materials conduct heat poorly. As these devices become smaller, thermal transport is increasingly limited by organic–inorganic interfaces, for example that between a metal and a polymer. However, the mechanisms of heat transp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandell, Susanne, Maire, Jeremie, Chávez-Ángel, Emigdio, Sotomayor Torres, Clivia M., Kristiansen, Helge, Zhang, Zhiliang, He, Jianying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7221886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32252435
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano10040670
_version_ 1783533461940731904
author Sandell, Susanne
Maire, Jeremie
Chávez-Ángel, Emigdio
Sotomayor Torres, Clivia M.
Kristiansen, Helge
Zhang, Zhiliang
He, Jianying
author_facet Sandell, Susanne
Maire, Jeremie
Chávez-Ángel, Emigdio
Sotomayor Torres, Clivia M.
Kristiansen, Helge
Zhang, Zhiliang
He, Jianying
author_sort Sandell, Susanne
collection PubMed
description In organic electronics, thermal management is a challenge, as most organic materials conduct heat poorly. As these devices become smaller, thermal transport is increasingly limited by organic–inorganic interfaces, for example that between a metal and a polymer. However, the mechanisms of heat transport at these interfaces are not well understood. In this work, we compare three types of metal–polymer interfaces. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) films of different thicknesses (1–15 nm) were spin-coated on silicon substrates and covered with an 80 nm gold film either directly, or over an interface layer of 2 nm of an adhesion promoting metal—either titanium or nickel. We use the frequency-domain thermoreflectance (FDTR) technique to measure the effective thermal conductivity of the polymer film and then extract the metal–polymer thermal boundary conductance (TBC) with a thermal resistance circuit model. We found that the titanium layer increased the TBC by a factor of 2, from 59 × 10(6) W·m(−2)·K(−1) to 115 × 10(6) W·m(−2)·K(−1), while the nickel layer increased TBC to 139 × 10(6) W·m(−2)·K(−1). These results shed light on possible strategies to improve heat transport in organic electronic systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7221886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72218862020-05-22 Enhancement of Thermal Boundary Conductance of Metal–Polymer System Sandell, Susanne Maire, Jeremie Chávez-Ángel, Emigdio Sotomayor Torres, Clivia M. Kristiansen, Helge Zhang, Zhiliang He, Jianying Nanomaterials (Basel) Article In organic electronics, thermal management is a challenge, as most organic materials conduct heat poorly. As these devices become smaller, thermal transport is increasingly limited by organic–inorganic interfaces, for example that between a metal and a polymer. However, the mechanisms of heat transport at these interfaces are not well understood. In this work, we compare three types of metal–polymer interfaces. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) films of different thicknesses (1–15 nm) were spin-coated on silicon substrates and covered with an 80 nm gold film either directly, or over an interface layer of 2 nm of an adhesion promoting metal—either titanium or nickel. We use the frequency-domain thermoreflectance (FDTR) technique to measure the effective thermal conductivity of the polymer film and then extract the metal–polymer thermal boundary conductance (TBC) with a thermal resistance circuit model. We found that the titanium layer increased the TBC by a factor of 2, from 59 × 10(6) W·m(−2)·K(−1) to 115 × 10(6) W·m(−2)·K(−1), while the nickel layer increased TBC to 139 × 10(6) W·m(−2)·K(−1). These results shed light on possible strategies to improve heat transport in organic electronic systems. MDPI 2020-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7221886/ /pubmed/32252435 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano10040670 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sandell, Susanne
Maire, Jeremie
Chávez-Ángel, Emigdio
Sotomayor Torres, Clivia M.
Kristiansen, Helge
Zhang, Zhiliang
He, Jianying
Enhancement of Thermal Boundary Conductance of Metal–Polymer System
title Enhancement of Thermal Boundary Conductance of Metal–Polymer System
title_full Enhancement of Thermal Boundary Conductance of Metal–Polymer System
title_fullStr Enhancement of Thermal Boundary Conductance of Metal–Polymer System
title_full_unstemmed Enhancement of Thermal Boundary Conductance of Metal–Polymer System
title_short Enhancement of Thermal Boundary Conductance of Metal–Polymer System
title_sort enhancement of thermal boundary conductance of metal–polymer system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7221886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32252435
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano10040670
work_keys_str_mv AT sandellsusanne enhancementofthermalboundaryconductanceofmetalpolymersystem
AT mairejeremie enhancementofthermalboundaryconductanceofmetalpolymersystem
AT chavezangelemigdio enhancementofthermalboundaryconductanceofmetalpolymersystem
AT sotomayortorrescliviam enhancementofthermalboundaryconductanceofmetalpolymersystem
AT kristiansenhelge enhancementofthermalboundaryconductanceofmetalpolymersystem
AT zhangzhiliang enhancementofthermalboundaryconductanceofmetalpolymersystem
AT hejianying enhancementofthermalboundaryconductanceofmetalpolymersystem