Cargando…
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with central cannulation: A cost-benefit analysis in a developing country
BACKGROUND: Minimally-invasive approaches to aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) are technically and logistically demanding. However, few centers have started using these approaches with standard equipment because of the limited resources. We sought to report intra- and postoperative clinical outcomes...
Autores principales: | Sanad, Mohammed, Beshir, Hatem |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222165/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43057-020-00019-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement Via Right Anterior
Minithoracotomy and Central Cannulation Versus Conventional
Aortic Valve Replacement in Obese Patients
por: Abud, Burcin, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Results of minimally-invasive aortic-valve replacement in octogenarians
por: Sharma, Sobaran, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: Transapical Aortic Valve Replacement
por: Li, Ming, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
What are the benefits of a minimally invasive approach in frail octogenarian patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?
por: Abdullahi, Yusuf S, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement – pros and cons of keyhole aortic surgery
por: Kaczmarczyk, Marcin, et al.
Publicado: (2015)