Cargando…

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the outcomes and toxicity of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in ovarian cancer. METHODS: This retrospective analysis considered all patients treated with SBRT from 2009 to 2018 with a primary ovarian tumor. Follow-up included PET-CT and CT scans at 2–3 mon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kowalchuk, Roman O., Waters, Michael R., Richardson, K. Martin, Spencer, Kelly, Larner, James M., Irvin, William P., Kersh, Charles R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32404167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01564-w
_version_ 1783533543815643136
author Kowalchuk, Roman O.
Waters, Michael R.
Richardson, K. Martin
Spencer, Kelly
Larner, James M.
Irvin, William P.
Kersh, Charles R.
author_facet Kowalchuk, Roman O.
Waters, Michael R.
Richardson, K. Martin
Spencer, Kelly
Larner, James M.
Irvin, William P.
Kersh, Charles R.
author_sort Kowalchuk, Roman O.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the outcomes and toxicity of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in ovarian cancer. METHODS: This retrospective analysis considered all patients treated with SBRT from 2009 to 2018 with a primary ovarian tumor. Follow-up included PET-CT and CT scans at 2–3 month intervals. Statistical analysis primarily consisted of univariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards analysis, and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The study included 35 patients with 98 treatments for lymph nodes (51), local recurrence (21), and de novo solid metastases (26). Median biologically effective dose (BED), gross tumor volume, and planning target volume were 38.40 Gy, 10.41 cc, and 25.21 cc, respectively. 52 lesions showed complete radiographic response, and two-year local control was 80%. Median overall survival (OS) was 35.2 months, and two-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 12%. On univariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status > 0 was predictive of decreased OS (p = 0.0024) and PFS (p = 0.044). Factors predictive of local failure included lower BED (p = 0.016), treatment for recurrence (p = 0.029), and higher pre-treatment SUV (p = 0.026). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed BED ≤35 Gy (p < 0.005) and treatment for recurrence (p = 0.01) to be predictive of local failure. On Cox proportional hazards analysis, treatment of lymph nodes was predictive of complete radiographic response (hazard ratio (HR) = 4.95), as was higher BED (HR = 1.03). Toxicity included 27 cases of grade < 3 toxicity, and one grade 5 late toxicity of GI bleed from a radiation therapy-induced duodenal ulcer. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT provides durable local control with minimal toxicity in ovarian cancer, especially with BED > 35 Gy and treatment for lymph nodes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7222303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72223032020-05-20 Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer Kowalchuk, Roman O. Waters, Michael R. Richardson, K. Martin Spencer, Kelly Larner, James M. Irvin, William P. Kersh, Charles R. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the outcomes and toxicity of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in ovarian cancer. METHODS: This retrospective analysis considered all patients treated with SBRT from 2009 to 2018 with a primary ovarian tumor. Follow-up included PET-CT and CT scans at 2–3 month intervals. Statistical analysis primarily consisted of univariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards analysis, and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The study included 35 patients with 98 treatments for lymph nodes (51), local recurrence (21), and de novo solid metastases (26). Median biologically effective dose (BED), gross tumor volume, and planning target volume were 38.40 Gy, 10.41 cc, and 25.21 cc, respectively. 52 lesions showed complete radiographic response, and two-year local control was 80%. Median overall survival (OS) was 35.2 months, and two-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 12%. On univariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status > 0 was predictive of decreased OS (p = 0.0024) and PFS (p = 0.044). Factors predictive of local failure included lower BED (p = 0.016), treatment for recurrence (p = 0.029), and higher pre-treatment SUV (p = 0.026). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed BED ≤35 Gy (p < 0.005) and treatment for recurrence (p = 0.01) to be predictive of local failure. On Cox proportional hazards analysis, treatment of lymph nodes was predictive of complete radiographic response (hazard ratio (HR) = 4.95), as was higher BED (HR = 1.03). Toxicity included 27 cases of grade < 3 toxicity, and one grade 5 late toxicity of GI bleed from a radiation therapy-induced duodenal ulcer. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT provides durable local control with minimal toxicity in ovarian cancer, especially with BED > 35 Gy and treatment for lymph nodes. BioMed Central 2020-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7222303/ /pubmed/32404167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01564-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kowalchuk, Roman O.
Waters, Michael R.
Richardson, K. Martin
Spencer, Kelly
Larner, James M.
Irvin, William P.
Kersh, Charles R.
Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer
title Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer
title_full Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer
title_fullStr Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer
title_full_unstemmed Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer
title_short Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer
title_sort stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32404167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01564-w
work_keys_str_mv AT kowalchukromano stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinthetreatmentofovariancancer
AT watersmichaelr stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinthetreatmentofovariancancer
AT richardsonkmartin stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinthetreatmentofovariancancer
AT spencerkelly stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinthetreatmentofovariancancer
AT larnerjamesm stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinthetreatmentofovariancancer
AT irvinwilliamp stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinthetreatmentofovariancancer
AT kershcharlesr stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyinthetreatmentofovariancancer