Cargando…
Journey of vulnerability: a mixed-methods study to understand intrapartum transfers in Tanzania and Zambia
BACKGROUND: Timely intrapartum referral between facilities is pivotal in reducing maternal/neonatal mortality and morbidity but is distressing to women, resource-intensive and likely to cause delays in care provision. We explored the complexities around referrals to gain understanding of the charact...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32408871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02996-8 |
_version_ | 1783533572011851776 |
---|---|
author | Lavender, Tina Bedwell, Carol Blaikie, Kieran Danna, Valentina Actis Sutton, Chris Kasengele, Chowa Tembo Wakasiaka, Sabina Vwalika, Bellington Laisser, Rose |
author_facet | Lavender, Tina Bedwell, Carol Blaikie, Kieran Danna, Valentina Actis Sutton, Chris Kasengele, Chowa Tembo Wakasiaka, Sabina Vwalika, Bellington Laisser, Rose |
author_sort | Lavender, Tina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Timely intrapartum referral between facilities is pivotal in reducing maternal/neonatal mortality and morbidity but is distressing to women, resource-intensive and likely to cause delays in care provision. We explored the complexities around referrals to gain understanding of the characteristics, experiences and outcomes of those being transferred. METHODS: We used a mixed-method parallel convergent design, in Tanzania and Zambia. Quantitative data were collected from a consecutive, retrospective case-note review (target, n = 2000); intrapartum transfers and stillbirths were the outcomes of interest. A grounded theory approach was adopted for the qualitative element; data were collected from semi-structured interviews (n = 85) with women, partners and health providers. Observations (n = 33) of transfer were also conducted. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, followed by binary logistic regression models, with multiple imputation for missing data. Qualitative data were analysed using Strauss’s constant comparative approach. RESULTS: Intrapartum transfer rates were 11% (111/998; 2 unknown) in Tanzania and 37% (373/996; 1 unknown) in Zambia. Main reasons for transfer were prolonged/obstructed labour and pre-eclampsia/eclampsia. Women most likely to be transferred were from Zambia (as opposed to Tanzania), HIV positive, attended antenatal clinic < 4 times and living > 30 min away from the referral hospital. Differences were observed between countries. Of those transferred, delays in care were common and an increase in poor outcomes was observed. Qualitative findings identified three categories: social threats to successful transfer, barriers to timely intrapartum care and reparative interventions which were linked to a core category: journey of vulnerability. CONCLUSION: Although intrapartum transfers are inevitable, modifiable factors exist with the potential to improve the experience and outcomes for women. Effective transfers rely on adequate resources, effective transport infrastructures, social support and appropriate decision-making. However, women’s (and families) vulnerability can be reduced by empathic communication, timely assessment and a positive birth outcome; this can improve women’s resilience and influence positive decision-making, for the index and future pregnancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7222428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72224282020-05-20 Journey of vulnerability: a mixed-methods study to understand intrapartum transfers in Tanzania and Zambia Lavender, Tina Bedwell, Carol Blaikie, Kieran Danna, Valentina Actis Sutton, Chris Kasengele, Chowa Tembo Wakasiaka, Sabina Vwalika, Bellington Laisser, Rose BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Timely intrapartum referral between facilities is pivotal in reducing maternal/neonatal mortality and morbidity but is distressing to women, resource-intensive and likely to cause delays in care provision. We explored the complexities around referrals to gain understanding of the characteristics, experiences and outcomes of those being transferred. METHODS: We used a mixed-method parallel convergent design, in Tanzania and Zambia. Quantitative data were collected from a consecutive, retrospective case-note review (target, n = 2000); intrapartum transfers and stillbirths were the outcomes of interest. A grounded theory approach was adopted for the qualitative element; data were collected from semi-structured interviews (n = 85) with women, partners and health providers. Observations (n = 33) of transfer were also conducted. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, followed by binary logistic regression models, with multiple imputation for missing data. Qualitative data were analysed using Strauss’s constant comparative approach. RESULTS: Intrapartum transfer rates were 11% (111/998; 2 unknown) in Tanzania and 37% (373/996; 1 unknown) in Zambia. Main reasons for transfer were prolonged/obstructed labour and pre-eclampsia/eclampsia. Women most likely to be transferred were from Zambia (as opposed to Tanzania), HIV positive, attended antenatal clinic < 4 times and living > 30 min away from the referral hospital. Differences were observed between countries. Of those transferred, delays in care were common and an increase in poor outcomes was observed. Qualitative findings identified three categories: social threats to successful transfer, barriers to timely intrapartum care and reparative interventions which were linked to a core category: journey of vulnerability. CONCLUSION: Although intrapartum transfers are inevitable, modifiable factors exist with the potential to improve the experience and outcomes for women. Effective transfers rely on adequate resources, effective transport infrastructures, social support and appropriate decision-making. However, women’s (and families) vulnerability can be reduced by empathic communication, timely assessment and a positive birth outcome; this can improve women’s resilience and influence positive decision-making, for the index and future pregnancy. BioMed Central 2020-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7222428/ /pubmed/32408871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02996-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lavender, Tina Bedwell, Carol Blaikie, Kieran Danna, Valentina Actis Sutton, Chris Kasengele, Chowa Tembo Wakasiaka, Sabina Vwalika, Bellington Laisser, Rose Journey of vulnerability: a mixed-methods study to understand intrapartum transfers in Tanzania and Zambia |
title | Journey of vulnerability: a mixed-methods study to understand intrapartum transfers in Tanzania and Zambia |
title_full | Journey of vulnerability: a mixed-methods study to understand intrapartum transfers in Tanzania and Zambia |
title_fullStr | Journey of vulnerability: a mixed-methods study to understand intrapartum transfers in Tanzania and Zambia |
title_full_unstemmed | Journey of vulnerability: a mixed-methods study to understand intrapartum transfers in Tanzania and Zambia |
title_short | Journey of vulnerability: a mixed-methods study to understand intrapartum transfers in Tanzania and Zambia |
title_sort | journey of vulnerability: a mixed-methods study to understand intrapartum transfers in tanzania and zambia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32408871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02996-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lavendertina journeyofvulnerabilityamixedmethodsstudytounderstandintrapartumtransfersintanzaniaandzambia AT bedwellcarol journeyofvulnerabilityamixedmethodsstudytounderstandintrapartumtransfersintanzaniaandzambia AT blaikiekieran journeyofvulnerabilityamixedmethodsstudytounderstandintrapartumtransfersintanzaniaandzambia AT dannavalentinaactis journeyofvulnerabilityamixedmethodsstudytounderstandintrapartumtransfersintanzaniaandzambia AT suttonchris journeyofvulnerabilityamixedmethodsstudytounderstandintrapartumtransfersintanzaniaandzambia AT kasengelechowatembo journeyofvulnerabilityamixedmethodsstudytounderstandintrapartumtransfersintanzaniaandzambia AT wakasiakasabina journeyofvulnerabilityamixedmethodsstudytounderstandintrapartumtransfersintanzaniaandzambia AT vwalikabellington journeyofvulnerabilityamixedmethodsstudytounderstandintrapartumtransfersintanzaniaandzambia AT laisserrose journeyofvulnerabilityamixedmethodsstudytounderstandintrapartumtransfersintanzaniaandzambia |