Cargando…

Benefits of peritoneal ultrafiltration in HFpEF and HFrEF patients

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal ultrafiltration (pUF) in refractory heart failure (HF) reduces the incidence of decompensation episodes, which is of particular significance as each episode incrementally adds to mortality. Nevertheless, there are insufficient data about which patient cohort benefits the most....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grossekettler, Leonie, Schmack, Bastian, Brockmann, Carsten, Wanninger, Reinhard, Kreusser, Michael M., Frankenstein, Lutz, Kihm, Lars P., Zeier, Martin, Katus, Hugo A., Schwenger, Vedat, Remppis, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32410664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01777-x
_version_ 1783533579487150080
author Grossekettler, Leonie
Schmack, Bastian
Brockmann, Carsten
Wanninger, Reinhard
Kreusser, Michael M.
Frankenstein, Lutz
Kihm, Lars P.
Zeier, Martin
Katus, Hugo A.
Schwenger, Vedat
Remppis, Andrew
author_facet Grossekettler, Leonie
Schmack, Bastian
Brockmann, Carsten
Wanninger, Reinhard
Kreusser, Michael M.
Frankenstein, Lutz
Kihm, Lars P.
Zeier, Martin
Katus, Hugo A.
Schwenger, Vedat
Remppis, Andrew
author_sort Grossekettler, Leonie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Peritoneal ultrafiltration (pUF) in refractory heart failure (HF) reduces the incidence of decompensation episodes, which is of particular significance as each episode incrementally adds to mortality. Nevertheless, there are insufficient data about which patient cohort benefits the most. The objective of this study was to compare pUF in HFrEF and HFpEF, focusing on functional status, hospitalizations, surrogate endpoints and mortality. METHODS: This study involves 143 patients, who could be classified as either HFpEF (n = 37, 25.9%) or HFrEF (n = 106, 74.1%) and who received pUF due to refractory HF. RESULTS: Baseline eGFR was similar in HFrEF (23.1 ± 10.6 mg/dl) and HFpEF (27.8 ± 13.2 mg/dl). Significant improvements in NYHA class were found in HFpEF (3.19 ± 0.61 to 2.72 ± 0.58, P <  0.001) and HFrEF (3.45 ± 0.52 to 2.71 ± 0.72, P <  0.001). CRP decreased in HFrEF (19.4 ± 17.6 mg/l to 13.7 ± 21.4 mg/l, P = 0.018) and HFpEF (33.7 ± 52.6 mg/l to 17.1 ± 26.3 mg/l, P = 0.004). Body weight was significantly reduced in HFrEF (81.1 ± 14.6 kg to 77.2 ± 15.6 kg, P = 0.003) and HFpEF (86.9 ± 15.8 kg to 83.1 ± 15.9 kg, P = 0.005). LVEF improved only in HFrEF (25.9 ± 6.82% to 30.4 ± 12.2%, P = 0.046). BCR decreased significantly in HFrEF and HFpEF (55.7 ± 21.9 to 34.3 ± 17.9 P > 0.001 and 50.5 ± 68.9 to 37.6 ± 21.9, P = 0.006). Number of hospitalization episodes as well as number of hospitalization days decreased significantly only in HFpEF (total number 2.88 ± 1.62 to 1.25 ± 1.45, P <  0.001, days 40.4 ± 31.7 to 18.3 ± 22.5 days, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: pUF offers various benefits in HFpEF and HFrEF, but there are also substantial differences. In particular, hospitalization rates were found to be significantly reduced in HFpEF patients, indicating a greater medical and economical advantage. However, LVEF was only found to be improved in HFrEF patients. While pUF can now be regarded as an option to supplement classical HF therapy, further studies are desirable to obtain specifications about pUF in HFpEF, HFmEF and HFrEF patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7222460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72224602020-05-20 Benefits of peritoneal ultrafiltration in HFpEF and HFrEF patients Grossekettler, Leonie Schmack, Bastian Brockmann, Carsten Wanninger, Reinhard Kreusser, Michael M. Frankenstein, Lutz Kihm, Lars P. Zeier, Martin Katus, Hugo A. Schwenger, Vedat Remppis, Andrew BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Peritoneal ultrafiltration (pUF) in refractory heart failure (HF) reduces the incidence of decompensation episodes, which is of particular significance as each episode incrementally adds to mortality. Nevertheless, there are insufficient data about which patient cohort benefits the most. The objective of this study was to compare pUF in HFrEF and HFpEF, focusing on functional status, hospitalizations, surrogate endpoints and mortality. METHODS: This study involves 143 patients, who could be classified as either HFpEF (n = 37, 25.9%) or HFrEF (n = 106, 74.1%) and who received pUF due to refractory HF. RESULTS: Baseline eGFR was similar in HFrEF (23.1 ± 10.6 mg/dl) and HFpEF (27.8 ± 13.2 mg/dl). Significant improvements in NYHA class were found in HFpEF (3.19 ± 0.61 to 2.72 ± 0.58, P <  0.001) and HFrEF (3.45 ± 0.52 to 2.71 ± 0.72, P <  0.001). CRP decreased in HFrEF (19.4 ± 17.6 mg/l to 13.7 ± 21.4 mg/l, P = 0.018) and HFpEF (33.7 ± 52.6 mg/l to 17.1 ± 26.3 mg/l, P = 0.004). Body weight was significantly reduced in HFrEF (81.1 ± 14.6 kg to 77.2 ± 15.6 kg, P = 0.003) and HFpEF (86.9 ± 15.8 kg to 83.1 ± 15.9 kg, P = 0.005). LVEF improved only in HFrEF (25.9 ± 6.82% to 30.4 ± 12.2%, P = 0.046). BCR decreased significantly in HFrEF and HFpEF (55.7 ± 21.9 to 34.3 ± 17.9 P > 0.001 and 50.5 ± 68.9 to 37.6 ± 21.9, P = 0.006). Number of hospitalization episodes as well as number of hospitalization days decreased significantly only in HFpEF (total number 2.88 ± 1.62 to 1.25 ± 1.45, P <  0.001, days 40.4 ± 31.7 to 18.3 ± 22.5 days, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: pUF offers various benefits in HFpEF and HFrEF, but there are also substantial differences. In particular, hospitalization rates were found to be significantly reduced in HFpEF patients, indicating a greater medical and economical advantage. However, LVEF was only found to be improved in HFrEF patients. While pUF can now be regarded as an option to supplement classical HF therapy, further studies are desirable to obtain specifications about pUF in HFpEF, HFmEF and HFrEF patients. BioMed Central 2020-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7222460/ /pubmed/32410664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01777-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grossekettler, Leonie
Schmack, Bastian
Brockmann, Carsten
Wanninger, Reinhard
Kreusser, Michael M.
Frankenstein, Lutz
Kihm, Lars P.
Zeier, Martin
Katus, Hugo A.
Schwenger, Vedat
Remppis, Andrew
Benefits of peritoneal ultrafiltration in HFpEF and HFrEF patients
title Benefits of peritoneal ultrafiltration in HFpEF and HFrEF patients
title_full Benefits of peritoneal ultrafiltration in HFpEF and HFrEF patients
title_fullStr Benefits of peritoneal ultrafiltration in HFpEF and HFrEF patients
title_full_unstemmed Benefits of peritoneal ultrafiltration in HFpEF and HFrEF patients
title_short Benefits of peritoneal ultrafiltration in HFpEF and HFrEF patients
title_sort benefits of peritoneal ultrafiltration in hfpef and hfref patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32410664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01777-x
work_keys_str_mv AT grossekettlerleonie benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients
AT schmackbastian benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients
AT brockmanncarsten benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients
AT wanningerreinhard benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients
AT kreussermichaelm benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients
AT frankensteinlutz benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients
AT kihmlarsp benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients
AT zeiermartin benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients
AT katushugoa benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients
AT schwengervedat benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients
AT remppisandrew benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients