Cargando…
Benefits of peritoneal ultrafiltration in HFpEF and HFrEF patients
BACKGROUND: Peritoneal ultrafiltration (pUF) in refractory heart failure (HF) reduces the incidence of decompensation episodes, which is of particular significance as each episode incrementally adds to mortality. Nevertheless, there are insufficient data about which patient cohort benefits the most....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32410664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01777-x |
_version_ | 1783533579487150080 |
---|---|
author | Grossekettler, Leonie Schmack, Bastian Brockmann, Carsten Wanninger, Reinhard Kreusser, Michael M. Frankenstein, Lutz Kihm, Lars P. Zeier, Martin Katus, Hugo A. Schwenger, Vedat Remppis, Andrew |
author_facet | Grossekettler, Leonie Schmack, Bastian Brockmann, Carsten Wanninger, Reinhard Kreusser, Michael M. Frankenstein, Lutz Kihm, Lars P. Zeier, Martin Katus, Hugo A. Schwenger, Vedat Remppis, Andrew |
author_sort | Grossekettler, Leonie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Peritoneal ultrafiltration (pUF) in refractory heart failure (HF) reduces the incidence of decompensation episodes, which is of particular significance as each episode incrementally adds to mortality. Nevertheless, there are insufficient data about which patient cohort benefits the most. The objective of this study was to compare pUF in HFrEF and HFpEF, focusing on functional status, hospitalizations, surrogate endpoints and mortality. METHODS: This study involves 143 patients, who could be classified as either HFpEF (n = 37, 25.9%) or HFrEF (n = 106, 74.1%) and who received pUF due to refractory HF. RESULTS: Baseline eGFR was similar in HFrEF (23.1 ± 10.6 mg/dl) and HFpEF (27.8 ± 13.2 mg/dl). Significant improvements in NYHA class were found in HFpEF (3.19 ± 0.61 to 2.72 ± 0.58, P < 0.001) and HFrEF (3.45 ± 0.52 to 2.71 ± 0.72, P < 0.001). CRP decreased in HFrEF (19.4 ± 17.6 mg/l to 13.7 ± 21.4 mg/l, P = 0.018) and HFpEF (33.7 ± 52.6 mg/l to 17.1 ± 26.3 mg/l, P = 0.004). Body weight was significantly reduced in HFrEF (81.1 ± 14.6 kg to 77.2 ± 15.6 kg, P = 0.003) and HFpEF (86.9 ± 15.8 kg to 83.1 ± 15.9 kg, P = 0.005). LVEF improved only in HFrEF (25.9 ± 6.82% to 30.4 ± 12.2%, P = 0.046). BCR decreased significantly in HFrEF and HFpEF (55.7 ± 21.9 to 34.3 ± 17.9 P > 0.001 and 50.5 ± 68.9 to 37.6 ± 21.9, P = 0.006). Number of hospitalization episodes as well as number of hospitalization days decreased significantly only in HFpEF (total number 2.88 ± 1.62 to 1.25 ± 1.45, P < 0.001, days 40.4 ± 31.7 to 18.3 ± 22.5 days, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: pUF offers various benefits in HFpEF and HFrEF, but there are also substantial differences. In particular, hospitalization rates were found to be significantly reduced in HFpEF patients, indicating a greater medical and economical advantage. However, LVEF was only found to be improved in HFrEF patients. While pUF can now be regarded as an option to supplement classical HF therapy, further studies are desirable to obtain specifications about pUF in HFpEF, HFmEF and HFrEF patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7222460 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72224602020-05-20 Benefits of peritoneal ultrafiltration in HFpEF and HFrEF patients Grossekettler, Leonie Schmack, Bastian Brockmann, Carsten Wanninger, Reinhard Kreusser, Michael M. Frankenstein, Lutz Kihm, Lars P. Zeier, Martin Katus, Hugo A. Schwenger, Vedat Remppis, Andrew BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: Peritoneal ultrafiltration (pUF) in refractory heart failure (HF) reduces the incidence of decompensation episodes, which is of particular significance as each episode incrementally adds to mortality. Nevertheless, there are insufficient data about which patient cohort benefits the most. The objective of this study was to compare pUF in HFrEF and HFpEF, focusing on functional status, hospitalizations, surrogate endpoints and mortality. METHODS: This study involves 143 patients, who could be classified as either HFpEF (n = 37, 25.9%) or HFrEF (n = 106, 74.1%) and who received pUF due to refractory HF. RESULTS: Baseline eGFR was similar in HFrEF (23.1 ± 10.6 mg/dl) and HFpEF (27.8 ± 13.2 mg/dl). Significant improvements in NYHA class were found in HFpEF (3.19 ± 0.61 to 2.72 ± 0.58, P < 0.001) and HFrEF (3.45 ± 0.52 to 2.71 ± 0.72, P < 0.001). CRP decreased in HFrEF (19.4 ± 17.6 mg/l to 13.7 ± 21.4 mg/l, P = 0.018) and HFpEF (33.7 ± 52.6 mg/l to 17.1 ± 26.3 mg/l, P = 0.004). Body weight was significantly reduced in HFrEF (81.1 ± 14.6 kg to 77.2 ± 15.6 kg, P = 0.003) and HFpEF (86.9 ± 15.8 kg to 83.1 ± 15.9 kg, P = 0.005). LVEF improved only in HFrEF (25.9 ± 6.82% to 30.4 ± 12.2%, P = 0.046). BCR decreased significantly in HFrEF and HFpEF (55.7 ± 21.9 to 34.3 ± 17.9 P > 0.001 and 50.5 ± 68.9 to 37.6 ± 21.9, P = 0.006). Number of hospitalization episodes as well as number of hospitalization days decreased significantly only in HFpEF (total number 2.88 ± 1.62 to 1.25 ± 1.45, P < 0.001, days 40.4 ± 31.7 to 18.3 ± 22.5 days, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: pUF offers various benefits in HFpEF and HFrEF, but there are also substantial differences. In particular, hospitalization rates were found to be significantly reduced in HFpEF patients, indicating a greater medical and economical advantage. However, LVEF was only found to be improved in HFrEF patients. While pUF can now be regarded as an option to supplement classical HF therapy, further studies are desirable to obtain specifications about pUF in HFpEF, HFmEF and HFrEF patients. BioMed Central 2020-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7222460/ /pubmed/32410664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01777-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Grossekettler, Leonie Schmack, Bastian Brockmann, Carsten Wanninger, Reinhard Kreusser, Michael M. Frankenstein, Lutz Kihm, Lars P. Zeier, Martin Katus, Hugo A. Schwenger, Vedat Remppis, Andrew Benefits of peritoneal ultrafiltration in HFpEF and HFrEF patients |
title | Benefits of peritoneal ultrafiltration in HFpEF and HFrEF patients |
title_full | Benefits of peritoneal ultrafiltration in HFpEF and HFrEF patients |
title_fullStr | Benefits of peritoneal ultrafiltration in HFpEF and HFrEF patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Benefits of peritoneal ultrafiltration in HFpEF and HFrEF patients |
title_short | Benefits of peritoneal ultrafiltration in HFpEF and HFrEF patients |
title_sort | benefits of peritoneal ultrafiltration in hfpef and hfref patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32410664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-020-01777-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grossekettlerleonie benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients AT schmackbastian benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients AT brockmanncarsten benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients AT wanningerreinhard benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients AT kreussermichaelm benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients AT frankensteinlutz benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients AT kihmlarsp benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients AT zeiermartin benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients AT katushugoa benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients AT schwengervedat benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients AT remppisandrew benefitsofperitonealultrafiltrationinhfpefandhfrefpatients |