Cargando…
Analysis of Lumbar Sagittal Curvature in Spinal Decompression and Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients under Roussouly Classification
To evaluate the clinical significance of spinal decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis in old patients under Roussouly classification, 160 old patients (>60 year old) with lumbar spinal stenosis underwent spinal decompression, and fusion were retrospectively studied. According to Rou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32462019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8078641 |
_version_ | 1783533587898826752 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Guoqiang Yang, Yong Hai, Yong Li, Jinjun Xie, Xuehu Feng, Shitong |
author_facet | Zhang, Guoqiang Yang, Yong Hai, Yong Li, Jinjun Xie, Xuehu Feng, Shitong |
author_sort | Zhang, Guoqiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | To evaluate the clinical significance of spinal decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis in old patients under Roussouly classification, 160 old patients (>60 year old) with lumbar spinal stenosis underwent spinal decompression, and fusion were retrospectively studied. According to Roussouly classification, patients were divided into 4 groups, in which Roussouly types I, II, and IV were the nonstandard group and Roussouly type III was the standard group. Visual analog scale (waist, leg) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were recorded before operation and at the final follow-up. All patients improved the sagittal curvature: for patients in Roussouly types I and II, there were statistically significant differences in terms of postoperative global lordosis (GL), global kyphosis (GK), sacral slope (SS), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and pelvic tilt (PT) compared with that before surgery (all P < 0.001); patients in Roussouly type IV obtained similar results with type III after surgery. The four groups showed significant improvement in ODI and VAS scores at final follow-up (all P < 0.001). After regrouping at the final follow-up, the proportion of the standard type (Roussouly type III) patients was increased compared with preoperative. In conclusion, Roussouly classification has important guiding significance in spinal decompression and fusion for old patients (>60 years) with lumbar spinal stenosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7222496 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72224962020-05-26 Analysis of Lumbar Sagittal Curvature in Spinal Decompression and Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients under Roussouly Classification Zhang, Guoqiang Yang, Yong Hai, Yong Li, Jinjun Xie, Xuehu Feng, Shitong Biomed Res Int Research Article To evaluate the clinical significance of spinal decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis in old patients under Roussouly classification, 160 old patients (>60 year old) with lumbar spinal stenosis underwent spinal decompression, and fusion were retrospectively studied. According to Roussouly classification, patients were divided into 4 groups, in which Roussouly types I, II, and IV were the nonstandard group and Roussouly type III was the standard group. Visual analog scale (waist, leg) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were recorded before operation and at the final follow-up. All patients improved the sagittal curvature: for patients in Roussouly types I and II, there were statistically significant differences in terms of postoperative global lordosis (GL), global kyphosis (GK), sacral slope (SS), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and pelvic tilt (PT) compared with that before surgery (all P < 0.001); patients in Roussouly type IV obtained similar results with type III after surgery. The four groups showed significant improvement in ODI and VAS scores at final follow-up (all P < 0.001). After regrouping at the final follow-up, the proportion of the standard type (Roussouly type III) patients was increased compared with preoperative. In conclusion, Roussouly classification has important guiding significance in spinal decompression and fusion for old patients (>60 years) with lumbar spinal stenosis. Hindawi 2020-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7222496/ /pubmed/32462019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8078641 Text en Copyright © 2020 Guoqiang Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Guoqiang Yang, Yong Hai, Yong Li, Jinjun Xie, Xuehu Feng, Shitong Analysis of Lumbar Sagittal Curvature in Spinal Decompression and Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients under Roussouly Classification |
title | Analysis of Lumbar Sagittal Curvature in Spinal Decompression and Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients under Roussouly Classification |
title_full | Analysis of Lumbar Sagittal Curvature in Spinal Decompression and Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients under Roussouly Classification |
title_fullStr | Analysis of Lumbar Sagittal Curvature in Spinal Decompression and Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients under Roussouly Classification |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Lumbar Sagittal Curvature in Spinal Decompression and Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients under Roussouly Classification |
title_short | Analysis of Lumbar Sagittal Curvature in Spinal Decompression and Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients under Roussouly Classification |
title_sort | analysis of lumbar sagittal curvature in spinal decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis patients under roussouly classification |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32462019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8078641 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangguoqiang analysisoflumbarsagittalcurvatureinspinaldecompressionandfusionforlumbarspinalstenosispatientsunderroussoulyclassification AT yangyong analysisoflumbarsagittalcurvatureinspinaldecompressionandfusionforlumbarspinalstenosispatientsunderroussoulyclassification AT haiyong analysisoflumbarsagittalcurvatureinspinaldecompressionandfusionforlumbarspinalstenosispatientsunderroussoulyclassification AT lijinjun analysisoflumbarsagittalcurvatureinspinaldecompressionandfusionforlumbarspinalstenosispatientsunderroussoulyclassification AT xiexuehu analysisoflumbarsagittalcurvatureinspinaldecompressionandfusionforlumbarspinalstenosispatientsunderroussoulyclassification AT fengshitong analysisoflumbarsagittalcurvatureinspinaldecompressionandfusionforlumbarspinalstenosispatientsunderroussoulyclassification |