Cargando…
Too much safety? Safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation
BACKGROUND: In June 2019, the Australian state of Victoria joined the growing number of jurisdictions around the world to have legalised some form of voluntary assisted dying. A discourse of safety was prominent during the implementation of the Victorian legislation. MAIN TEXT: In this paper, we ana...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32404097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00483-5 |
_version_ | 1783533602440478720 |
---|---|
author | McDougall, Rosalind Pratt, Bridget |
author_facet | McDougall, Rosalind Pratt, Bridget |
author_sort | McDougall, Rosalind |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In June 2019, the Australian state of Victoria joined the growing number of jurisdictions around the world to have legalised some form of voluntary assisted dying. A discourse of safety was prominent during the implementation of the Victorian legislation. MAIN TEXT: In this paper, we analyse the ethical relationship between legislative “safeguards” and equal access. Drawing primarily on Ruger’s model of equal access to health care services, we analyse the Victorian approach to voluntary assisted dying in terms of four dimensions: horizontal equity, patient agency, high quality care, and supportive social norms. We argue that some provisions framed as safeguards in the legislation create significant barriers to equal access for eligible patients. CONCLUSIONS: While safety is undoubtedly ethically important, we caution against an overemphasis on safeguarding in voluntary assisted dying legislation given the implications for equal access. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7222560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72225602020-05-27 Too much safety? Safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation McDougall, Rosalind Pratt, Bridget BMC Med Ethics Debate BACKGROUND: In June 2019, the Australian state of Victoria joined the growing number of jurisdictions around the world to have legalised some form of voluntary assisted dying. A discourse of safety was prominent during the implementation of the Victorian legislation. MAIN TEXT: In this paper, we analyse the ethical relationship between legislative “safeguards” and equal access. Drawing primarily on Ruger’s model of equal access to health care services, we analyse the Victorian approach to voluntary assisted dying in terms of four dimensions: horizontal equity, patient agency, high quality care, and supportive social norms. We argue that some provisions framed as safeguards in the legislation create significant barriers to equal access for eligible patients. CONCLUSIONS: While safety is undoubtedly ethically important, we caution against an overemphasis on safeguarding in voluntary assisted dying legislation given the implications for equal access. BioMed Central 2020-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7222560/ /pubmed/32404097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00483-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Debate McDougall, Rosalind Pratt, Bridget Too much safety? Safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation |
title | Too much safety? Safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation |
title_full | Too much safety? Safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation |
title_fullStr | Too much safety? Safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation |
title_full_unstemmed | Too much safety? Safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation |
title_short | Too much safety? Safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation |
title_sort | too much safety? safeguards and equal access in the context of voluntary assisted dying legislation |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32404097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00483-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcdougallrosalind toomuchsafetysafeguardsandequalaccessinthecontextofvoluntaryassisteddyinglegislation AT prattbridget toomuchsafetysafeguardsandequalaccessinthecontextofvoluntaryassisteddyinglegislation |