Cargando…
Quantitative prediction of selectivity between the A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors
The development of drugs is often hampered due to off-target interactions leading to adverse effects. Therefore, computational methods to assess the selectivity of ligands are of high interest. Currently, selectivity is often deduced from bioactivity predictions of a ligand for multiple targets (ind...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33431012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-020-00438-3 |
_version_ | 1783533605224448000 |
---|---|
author | Burggraaff, Lindsey van Vlijmen, Herman W. T. IJzerman, Adriaan P. van Westen, Gerard J. P. |
author_facet | Burggraaff, Lindsey van Vlijmen, Herman W. T. IJzerman, Adriaan P. van Westen, Gerard J. P. |
author_sort | Burggraaff, Lindsey |
collection | PubMed |
description | The development of drugs is often hampered due to off-target interactions leading to adverse effects. Therefore, computational methods to assess the selectivity of ligands are of high interest. Currently, selectivity is often deduced from bioactivity predictions of a ligand for multiple targets (individual machine learning models). Here we show that modeling selectivity directly, by using the affinity difference between two drug targets as output value, leads to more accurate selectivity predictions. We test multiple approaches on a dataset consisting of ligands for the A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors (among others classification, regression, and we define different selectivity classes). Finally, we present a regression model that predicts selectivity between these two drug targets by directly training on the difference in bioactivity, modeling the selectivity-window. The quality of this model was good as shown by the performances for fivefold cross-validation: ROC A(1)AR-selective 0.88 ± 0.04 and ROC A(2A)AR-selective 0.80 ± 0.07. To increase the accuracy of this selectivity model even further, inactive compounds were identified and removed prior to selectivity prediction by a combination of statistical models and structure-based docking. As a result, selectivity between the A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors was predicted effectively using the selectivity-window model. The approach presented here can be readily applied to other selectivity cases. [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7222572 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72225722020-05-27 Quantitative prediction of selectivity between the A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors Burggraaff, Lindsey van Vlijmen, Herman W. T. IJzerman, Adriaan P. van Westen, Gerard J. P. J Cheminform Research Article The development of drugs is often hampered due to off-target interactions leading to adverse effects. Therefore, computational methods to assess the selectivity of ligands are of high interest. Currently, selectivity is often deduced from bioactivity predictions of a ligand for multiple targets (individual machine learning models). Here we show that modeling selectivity directly, by using the affinity difference between two drug targets as output value, leads to more accurate selectivity predictions. We test multiple approaches on a dataset consisting of ligands for the A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors (among others classification, regression, and we define different selectivity classes). Finally, we present a regression model that predicts selectivity between these two drug targets by directly training on the difference in bioactivity, modeling the selectivity-window. The quality of this model was good as shown by the performances for fivefold cross-validation: ROC A(1)AR-selective 0.88 ± 0.04 and ROC A(2A)AR-selective 0.80 ± 0.07. To increase the accuracy of this selectivity model even further, inactive compounds were identified and removed prior to selectivity prediction by a combination of statistical models and structure-based docking. As a result, selectivity between the A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors was predicted effectively using the selectivity-window model. The approach presented here can be readily applied to other selectivity cases. [Image: see text] Springer International Publishing 2020-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7222572/ /pubmed/33431012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-020-00438-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Burggraaff, Lindsey van Vlijmen, Herman W. T. IJzerman, Adriaan P. van Westen, Gerard J. P. Quantitative prediction of selectivity between the A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors |
title | Quantitative prediction of selectivity between the A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors |
title_full | Quantitative prediction of selectivity between the A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors |
title_fullStr | Quantitative prediction of selectivity between the A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative prediction of selectivity between the A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors |
title_short | Quantitative prediction of selectivity between the A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors |
title_sort | quantitative prediction of selectivity between the a(1) and a(2a) adenosine receptors |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33431012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13321-020-00438-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burggraafflindsey quantitativepredictionofselectivitybetweenthea1anda2aadenosinereceptors AT vanvlijmenhermanwt quantitativepredictionofselectivitybetweenthea1anda2aadenosinereceptors AT ijzermanadriaanp quantitativepredictionofselectivitybetweenthea1anda2aadenosinereceptors AT vanwestengerardjp quantitativepredictionofselectivitybetweenthea1anda2aadenosinereceptors |