Cargando…

Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical model study. OBJECTIVE: The Barrow Biomimetic Spine (BBS) project is a resident-driven effort to manufacture a synthetic spine model with high biomechanical fidelity to human tissue. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of the current generation of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bohl, Michael A., McBryan, Sarah, Newcomb, Anna G. U. S., Lehrman, Jennifer N., Kelly, Brian P., Nakaji, Peter, Chang, Steve W., Uribe, Juan S., Turner, Jay D., Kakarla, U. Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219858981
_version_ 1783533628788047872
author Bohl, Michael A.
McBryan, Sarah
Newcomb, Anna G. U. S.
Lehrman, Jennifer N.
Kelly, Brian P.
Nakaji, Peter
Chang, Steve W.
Uribe, Juan S.
Turner, Jay D.
Kakarla, U. Kumar
author_facet Bohl, Michael A.
McBryan, Sarah
Newcomb, Anna G. U. S.
Lehrman, Jennifer N.
Kelly, Brian P.
Nakaji, Peter
Chang, Steve W.
Uribe, Juan S.
Turner, Jay D.
Kakarla, U. Kumar
author_sort Bohl, Michael A.
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical model study. OBJECTIVE: The Barrow Biomimetic Spine (BBS) project is a resident-driven effort to manufacture a synthetic spine model with high biomechanical fidelity to human tissue. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of the current generation of BBS models on biomechanical testing of range of motion (ROM) and axial compression and to compare the performance of these models to historical cadaveric data acquired using the same testing protocol. METHODS: Six synthetic spine models comprising L3-5 segments were manufactured with variable soft-tissue densities and print orientations. Models underwent torque loading to a maximum of 7.5 N m. Torques were applied to the models in flexion-extension, lateral bending, axial rotation, and axial compression. Results were compared with historic cadaveric control data. RESULTS: Each model demonstrated steadily decreasing ROM on flexion-extension testing with increasing density of the intervertebral discs and surrounding ligamentous structures. Vertically printed models demonstrated markedly less ROM than equivalent models printed horizontally at both L3-4 (5.0° vs 14.0°) and L4-5 (3.9° vs 15.2°). Models D and E demonstrated ROM values that bracketed the cadaveric controls at equivalent torque loads (7.5 N m). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified relevant variables that affect synthetic spine model ROM and compressibility, confirmed that the models perform predictably with changes in these print variables, and identified a set of model parameters that result in a synthetic model with overall ROM that approximates that of a cadaveric model. Future studies can be undertaken to refine model performance and determine intermodel variability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7222693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72226932020-05-20 Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model Bohl, Michael A. McBryan, Sarah Newcomb, Anna G. U. S. Lehrman, Jennifer N. Kelly, Brian P. Nakaji, Peter Chang, Steve W. Uribe, Juan S. Turner, Jay D. Kakarla, U. Kumar Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical model study. OBJECTIVE: The Barrow Biomimetic Spine (BBS) project is a resident-driven effort to manufacture a synthetic spine model with high biomechanical fidelity to human tissue. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of the current generation of BBS models on biomechanical testing of range of motion (ROM) and axial compression and to compare the performance of these models to historical cadaveric data acquired using the same testing protocol. METHODS: Six synthetic spine models comprising L3-5 segments were manufactured with variable soft-tissue densities and print orientations. Models underwent torque loading to a maximum of 7.5 N m. Torques were applied to the models in flexion-extension, lateral bending, axial rotation, and axial compression. Results were compared with historic cadaveric control data. RESULTS: Each model demonstrated steadily decreasing ROM on flexion-extension testing with increasing density of the intervertebral discs and surrounding ligamentous structures. Vertically printed models demonstrated markedly less ROM than equivalent models printed horizontally at both L3-4 (5.0° vs 14.0°) and L4-5 (3.9° vs 15.2°). Models D and E demonstrated ROM values that bracketed the cadaveric controls at equivalent torque loads (7.5 N m). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified relevant variables that affect synthetic spine model ROM and compressibility, confirmed that the models perform predictably with changes in these print variables, and identified a set of model parameters that result in a synthetic model with overall ROM that approximates that of a cadaveric model. Future studies can be undertaken to refine model performance and determine intermodel variability. SAGE Publications 2019-06-23 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7222693/ /pubmed/32435561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219858981 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bohl, Michael A.
McBryan, Sarah
Newcomb, Anna G. U. S.
Lehrman, Jennifer N.
Kelly, Brian P.
Nakaji, Peter
Chang, Steve W.
Uribe, Juan S.
Turner, Jay D.
Kakarla, U. Kumar
Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model
title Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model
title_full Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model
title_fullStr Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model
title_full_unstemmed Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model
title_short Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model
title_sort range of motion testing of a novel 3d-printed synthetic spine model
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219858981
work_keys_str_mv AT bohlmichaela rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel
AT mcbryansarah rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel
AT newcombannagus rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel
AT lehrmanjennifern rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel
AT kellybrianp rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel
AT nakajipeter rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel
AT changstevew rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel
AT uribejuans rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel
AT turnerjayd rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel
AT kakarlaukumar rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel