Cargando…
Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model
STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical model study. OBJECTIVE: The Barrow Biomimetic Spine (BBS) project is a resident-driven effort to manufacture a synthetic spine model with high biomechanical fidelity to human tissue. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of the current generation of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219858981 |
_version_ | 1783533628788047872 |
---|---|
author | Bohl, Michael A. McBryan, Sarah Newcomb, Anna G. U. S. Lehrman, Jennifer N. Kelly, Brian P. Nakaji, Peter Chang, Steve W. Uribe, Juan S. Turner, Jay D. Kakarla, U. Kumar |
author_facet | Bohl, Michael A. McBryan, Sarah Newcomb, Anna G. U. S. Lehrman, Jennifer N. Kelly, Brian P. Nakaji, Peter Chang, Steve W. Uribe, Juan S. Turner, Jay D. Kakarla, U. Kumar |
author_sort | Bohl, Michael A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical model study. OBJECTIVE: The Barrow Biomimetic Spine (BBS) project is a resident-driven effort to manufacture a synthetic spine model with high biomechanical fidelity to human tissue. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of the current generation of BBS models on biomechanical testing of range of motion (ROM) and axial compression and to compare the performance of these models to historical cadaveric data acquired using the same testing protocol. METHODS: Six synthetic spine models comprising L3-5 segments were manufactured with variable soft-tissue densities and print orientations. Models underwent torque loading to a maximum of 7.5 N m. Torques were applied to the models in flexion-extension, lateral bending, axial rotation, and axial compression. Results were compared with historic cadaveric control data. RESULTS: Each model demonstrated steadily decreasing ROM on flexion-extension testing with increasing density of the intervertebral discs and surrounding ligamentous structures. Vertically printed models demonstrated markedly less ROM than equivalent models printed horizontally at both L3-4 (5.0° vs 14.0°) and L4-5 (3.9° vs 15.2°). Models D and E demonstrated ROM values that bracketed the cadaveric controls at equivalent torque loads (7.5 N m). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified relevant variables that affect synthetic spine model ROM and compressibility, confirmed that the models perform predictably with changes in these print variables, and identified a set of model parameters that result in a synthetic model with overall ROM that approximates that of a cadaveric model. Future studies can be undertaken to refine model performance and determine intermodel variability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7222693 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72226932020-05-20 Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model Bohl, Michael A. McBryan, Sarah Newcomb, Anna G. U. S. Lehrman, Jennifer N. Kelly, Brian P. Nakaji, Peter Chang, Steve W. Uribe, Juan S. Turner, Jay D. Kakarla, U. Kumar Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical model study. OBJECTIVE: The Barrow Biomimetic Spine (BBS) project is a resident-driven effort to manufacture a synthetic spine model with high biomechanical fidelity to human tissue. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of the current generation of BBS models on biomechanical testing of range of motion (ROM) and axial compression and to compare the performance of these models to historical cadaveric data acquired using the same testing protocol. METHODS: Six synthetic spine models comprising L3-5 segments were manufactured with variable soft-tissue densities and print orientations. Models underwent torque loading to a maximum of 7.5 N m. Torques were applied to the models in flexion-extension, lateral bending, axial rotation, and axial compression. Results were compared with historic cadaveric control data. RESULTS: Each model demonstrated steadily decreasing ROM on flexion-extension testing with increasing density of the intervertebral discs and surrounding ligamentous structures. Vertically printed models demonstrated markedly less ROM than equivalent models printed horizontally at both L3-4 (5.0° vs 14.0°) and L4-5 (3.9° vs 15.2°). Models D and E demonstrated ROM values that bracketed the cadaveric controls at equivalent torque loads (7.5 N m). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified relevant variables that affect synthetic spine model ROM and compressibility, confirmed that the models perform predictably with changes in these print variables, and identified a set of model parameters that result in a synthetic model with overall ROM that approximates that of a cadaveric model. Future studies can be undertaken to refine model performance and determine intermodel variability. SAGE Publications 2019-06-23 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7222693/ /pubmed/32435561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219858981 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Bohl, Michael A. McBryan, Sarah Newcomb, Anna G. U. S. Lehrman, Jennifer N. Kelly, Brian P. Nakaji, Peter Chang, Steve W. Uribe, Juan S. Turner, Jay D. Kakarla, U. Kumar Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model |
title | Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model |
title_full | Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model |
title_fullStr | Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model |
title_short | Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model |
title_sort | range of motion testing of a novel 3d-printed synthetic spine model |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568219858981 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bohlmichaela rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel AT mcbryansarah rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel AT newcombannagus rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel AT lehrmanjennifern rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel AT kellybrianp rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel AT nakajipeter rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel AT changstevew rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel AT uribejuans rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel AT turnerjayd rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel AT kakarlaukumar rangeofmotiontestingofanovel3dprintedsyntheticspinemodel |